The difficulty of coercion: A response to de Almeida

Martin J. Pickering, Brian McElree, Matthew J. Traxler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The sentence The secretary began the memo requires specifying what event the secretary began, because the memo does not refer to an event. McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff (2001) and Traxler, Pickering, and McElree (2002) found evidence from both self-paced reading and eye-tracking that such sentences caused processing difficulty, and thus argued that people "coerced" the object to refer to an event (e.g., writing the memo). de Almeida (2004) reports two self-paced reading experiments that failed to replicate some aspects of previous studies, and thereby argued against coercion during comprehension. A new experiment demonstrates coercion costs using new items, and provides evidence of coercion cost with de Almeida's stimuli. We conclude that coercion does cause processing difficulty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalBrain and Language
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Coercion
event
Reading
experiment
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
evidence
comprehension
stimulus
Self Report
cause
Costs
Self-paced Reading
Experiment

Keywords

  • Coercion
  • Semantics
  • Sentence processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The difficulty of coercion : A response to de Almeida. / Pickering, Martin J.; McElree, Brian; Traxler, Matthew J.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 93, No. 1, 04.2005, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pickering, MJ, McElree, B & Traxler, MJ 2005, 'The difficulty of coercion: A response to de Almeida', Brain and Language, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.005
Pickering, Martin J. ; McElree, Brian ; Traxler, Matthew J. / The difficulty of coercion : A response to de Almeida. In: Brain and Language. 2005 ; Vol. 93, No. 1. pp. 1-9.
@article{0b689b063cfc42b6bd32a5efc11fdc30,
title = "The difficulty of coercion: A response to de Almeida",
abstract = "The sentence The secretary began the memo requires specifying what event the secretary began, because the memo does not refer to an event. McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff (2001) and Traxler, Pickering, and McElree (2002) found evidence from both self-paced reading and eye-tracking that such sentences caused processing difficulty, and thus argued that people {"}coerced{"} the object to refer to an event (e.g., writing the memo). de Almeida (2004) reports two self-paced reading experiments that failed to replicate some aspects of previous studies, and thereby argued against coercion during comprehension. A new experiment demonstrates coercion costs using new items, and provides evidence of coercion cost with de Almeida's stimuli. We conclude that coercion does cause processing difficulty.",
keywords = "Coercion, Semantics, Sentence processing",
author = "Pickering, {Martin J.} and Brian McElree and Traxler, {Matthew J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The difficulty of coercion

T2 - A response to de Almeida

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - McElree, Brian

AU - Traxler, Matthew J.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - The sentence The secretary began the memo requires specifying what event the secretary began, because the memo does not refer to an event. McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff (2001) and Traxler, Pickering, and McElree (2002) found evidence from both self-paced reading and eye-tracking that such sentences caused processing difficulty, and thus argued that people "coerced" the object to refer to an event (e.g., writing the memo). de Almeida (2004) reports two self-paced reading experiments that failed to replicate some aspects of previous studies, and thereby argued against coercion during comprehension. A new experiment demonstrates coercion costs using new items, and provides evidence of coercion cost with de Almeida's stimuli. We conclude that coercion does cause processing difficulty.

AB - The sentence The secretary began the memo requires specifying what event the secretary began, because the memo does not refer to an event. McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff (2001) and Traxler, Pickering, and McElree (2002) found evidence from both self-paced reading and eye-tracking that such sentences caused processing difficulty, and thus argued that people "coerced" the object to refer to an event (e.g., writing the memo). de Almeida (2004) reports two self-paced reading experiments that failed to replicate some aspects of previous studies, and thereby argued against coercion during comprehension. A new experiment demonstrates coercion costs using new items, and provides evidence of coercion cost with de Almeida's stimuli. We conclude that coercion does cause processing difficulty.

KW - Coercion

KW - Semantics

KW - Sentence processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14844296436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14844296436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 15766763

AN - SCOPUS:14844296436

VL - 93

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

IS - 1

ER -