The differing perspectives of workers and occupational medicine physicians on the ethical, legal and social issues of genetic testing in the workplace.

Sherry I. Brandt-Rauf, Elka Brandt-Rauf, Robyn Gershon, Paul W. Brandt-Rauf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Genetic testing in the workplace holds the promise of improving worker health but also raises ethical, legal, and social issues. In considering such testing, it is critical to understand the perspectives of workers, who are most directly affected by it, and occupational health professionals, who are often directly involved in its implementation. Therefore, a series of focus groups of unionized workers (n=25) and occupational medicine physicians (n=23) was conducted. The results demonstrated strikingly different perspectives of workers and physicians in several key areas, including the goals and appropriateness of genetic testing, and methods to minimize its risks. In general, workers were guided by a profound mistrust of the employer, physician, and government, while physicians were guided primarily by scientific and medical concerns, and, in many cases, by the business concerns distrusted by the workers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-102
Number of pages14
JournalNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2011

Fingerprint

Occupational Medicine
Genetic Testing
Workplace
Physicians
Occupational Health
Focus Groups
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{7b3156aec2ba4ac99b2863c26ece0360,
title = "The differing perspectives of workers and occupational medicine physicians on the ethical, legal and social issues of genetic testing in the workplace.",
abstract = "Genetic testing in the workplace holds the promise of improving worker health but also raises ethical, legal, and social issues. In considering such testing, it is critical to understand the perspectives of workers, who are most directly affected by it, and occupational health professionals, who are often directly involved in its implementation. Therefore, a series of focus groups of unionized workers (n=25) and occupational medicine physicians (n=23) was conducted. The results demonstrated strikingly different perspectives of workers and physicians in several key areas, including the goals and appropriateness of genetic testing, and methods to minimize its risks. In general, workers were guided by a profound mistrust of the employer, physician, and government, while physicians were guided primarily by scientific and medical concerns, and, in many cases, by the business concerns distrusted by the workers.",
author = "Brandt-Rauf, {Sherry I.} and Elka Brandt-Rauf and Robyn Gershon and Brandt-Rauf, {Paul W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.2190/NS.21.1.j",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "89--102",
journal = "New Solutions",
issn = "1048-2911",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The differing perspectives of workers and occupational medicine physicians on the ethical, legal and social issues of genetic testing in the workplace.

AU - Brandt-Rauf, Sherry I.

AU - Brandt-Rauf, Elka

AU - Gershon, Robyn

AU - Brandt-Rauf, Paul W.

PY - 2011/6/30

Y1 - 2011/6/30

N2 - Genetic testing in the workplace holds the promise of improving worker health but also raises ethical, legal, and social issues. In considering such testing, it is critical to understand the perspectives of workers, who are most directly affected by it, and occupational health professionals, who are often directly involved in its implementation. Therefore, a series of focus groups of unionized workers (n=25) and occupational medicine physicians (n=23) was conducted. The results demonstrated strikingly different perspectives of workers and physicians in several key areas, including the goals and appropriateness of genetic testing, and methods to minimize its risks. In general, workers were guided by a profound mistrust of the employer, physician, and government, while physicians were guided primarily by scientific and medical concerns, and, in many cases, by the business concerns distrusted by the workers.

AB - Genetic testing in the workplace holds the promise of improving worker health but also raises ethical, legal, and social issues. In considering such testing, it is critical to understand the perspectives of workers, who are most directly affected by it, and occupational health professionals, who are often directly involved in its implementation. Therefore, a series of focus groups of unionized workers (n=25) and occupational medicine physicians (n=23) was conducted. The results demonstrated strikingly different perspectives of workers and physicians in several key areas, including the goals and appropriateness of genetic testing, and methods to minimize its risks. In general, workers were guided by a profound mistrust of the employer, physician, and government, while physicians were guided primarily by scientific and medical concerns, and, in many cases, by the business concerns distrusted by the workers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959574260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959574260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/NS.21.1.j

DO - 10.2190/NS.21.1.j

M3 - Article

C2 - 21411427

AN - SCOPUS:79959574260

VL - 21

SP - 89

EP - 102

JO - New Solutions

JF - New Solutions

SN - 1048-2911

IS - 1

ER -