The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes

Jessica Clark Newman, Don Des Jarlais, Charles F. Turner, Jay Gribble, Phillip Cooley, Denise Paone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the differential effects of face-to-face interviewing and audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) on categories of questions. Methods. Syringe exchange program participants (n = 1417) completed face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire was categorized into the groups "stigmatized behaviors," "neutral behaviors," and "psychological distress." Interview modes were compared for questions from each category. Results. Audio-CASI elicited more frequent reporting of "stigmatized behaviors" than face-to-face interviews. Face-to-face interviewing elicited more frequent reporting of "psychological distress" than audio-CASI. Conclusions. Responding to potentially sensitive questions should not be seen as merely "providing data," but rather as an activity with complex motivations. These motivations can include maintaining social respect, obtaining social support, and altruism. Ideally, procedures for collecting self-report data would maximize altruistic motivation while accommodating the other motives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-297
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Motivation
Interviews
Needle-Exchange Programs
Psychology
Altruism
Social Support
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. / Newman, Jessica Clark; Des Jarlais, Don; Turner, Charles F.; Gribble, Jay; Cooley, Phillip; Paone, Denise.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 92, No. 2, 01.01.2002, p. 294-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newman, Jessica Clark ; Des Jarlais, Don ; Turner, Charles F. ; Gribble, Jay ; Cooley, Phillip ; Paone, Denise. / The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2002 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 294-297.
@article{33de08b5c2844bf991d654ae99c827d4,
title = "The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes",
abstract = "Objectives. This study assessed the differential effects of face-to-face interviewing and audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) on categories of questions. Methods. Syringe exchange program participants (n = 1417) completed face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire was categorized into the groups {"}stigmatized behaviors,{"} {"}neutral behaviors,{"} and {"}psychological distress.{"} Interview modes were compared for questions from each category. Results. Audio-CASI elicited more frequent reporting of {"}stigmatized behaviors{"} than face-to-face interviews. Face-to-face interviewing elicited more frequent reporting of {"}psychological distress{"} than audio-CASI. Conclusions. Responding to potentially sensitive questions should not be seen as merely {"}providing data,{"} but rather as an activity with complex motivations. These motivations can include maintaining social respect, obtaining social support, and altruism. Ideally, procedures for collecting self-report data would maximize altruistic motivation while accommodating the other motives.",
author = "Newman, {Jessica Clark} and {Des Jarlais}, Don and Turner, {Charles F.} and Jay Gribble and Phillip Cooley and Denise Paone",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.92.2.294",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "294--297",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes

AU - Newman, Jessica Clark

AU - Des Jarlais, Don

AU - Turner, Charles F.

AU - Gribble, Jay

AU - Cooley, Phillip

AU - Paone, Denise

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Objectives. This study assessed the differential effects of face-to-face interviewing and audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) on categories of questions. Methods. Syringe exchange program participants (n = 1417) completed face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire was categorized into the groups "stigmatized behaviors," "neutral behaviors," and "psychological distress." Interview modes were compared for questions from each category. Results. Audio-CASI elicited more frequent reporting of "stigmatized behaviors" than face-to-face interviews. Face-to-face interviewing elicited more frequent reporting of "psychological distress" than audio-CASI. Conclusions. Responding to potentially sensitive questions should not be seen as merely "providing data," but rather as an activity with complex motivations. These motivations can include maintaining social respect, obtaining social support, and altruism. Ideally, procedures for collecting self-report data would maximize altruistic motivation while accommodating the other motives.

AB - Objectives. This study assessed the differential effects of face-to-face interviewing and audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) on categories of questions. Methods. Syringe exchange program participants (n = 1417) completed face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire was categorized into the groups "stigmatized behaviors," "neutral behaviors," and "psychological distress." Interview modes were compared for questions from each category. Results. Audio-CASI elicited more frequent reporting of "stigmatized behaviors" than face-to-face interviews. Face-to-face interviewing elicited more frequent reporting of "psychological distress" than audio-CASI. Conclusions. Responding to potentially sensitive questions should not be seen as merely "providing data," but rather as an activity with complex motivations. These motivations can include maintaining social respect, obtaining social support, and altruism. Ideally, procedures for collecting self-report data would maximize altruistic motivation while accommodating the other motives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036157719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036157719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.92.2.294

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.92.2.294

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 294

EP - 297

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 2

ER -