The development of tool use

Planning for end-state comfort

David M. Comalli, Rachel Keen, Evelyn S. Abraham, Victoria J. Foo, Mei Hua Lee, Karen Adolph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Some grips on the handle of a tool can be planned on the basis of information directly available in the scene. Other grips, however, must be planned on the basis of the final position of the hand. "End-state comfort" grips require an awkward or uncomfortable initial grip so as to later implement the action comfortably and efficiently. From a cognitive perspective, planning for end-state comfort requires a consistent representation of the entire action sequence, including the latter part, which is not based on information directly available in the scene. Many investigators have found that young children fail to demonstrate planning for end-state comfort and that adultlike performance does not appear until about 12 years of age. In 2 experiments, we used a hammering task that engaged children in a goal-directed action with multiple steps. We assessed end-state-comfort planning in novel ways by measuring children's hand choice, grip choice, and tool implementation over multiple trials. The hammering task also uniquely allowed us to assess the efficiency of implementation. We replicated the previous developmental trend in 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old children with our novel task. Most important, our data revealed that 4-year-olds are in a transitional stage during which several competing strategies were exhibited during a single session. Preschoolers changed their grip within trials and across trials, indicating awareness of errors and a willingness to sacrifice speed for more efficient implementation. The end-state-comfort grip initially competes as one grip type among many but gradually displaces all others. Children's sensitivity to costs and drive for efficiency may motivate this change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)878-1892
Number of pages1015
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume52
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hand Strength
planning
available information
state planning
efficiency
Hand
experiment
trend
costs
Research Personnel
performance
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Action planning
  • End-state comfort
  • Manual skills
  • Motor development
  • Tool use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Comalli, D. M., Keen, R., Abraham, E. S., Foo, V. J., Lee, M. H., & Adolph, K. (2016). The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 878-1892. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000207

The development of tool use : Planning for end-state comfort. / Comalli, David M.; Keen, Rachel; Abraham, Evelyn S.; Foo, Victoria J.; Lee, Mei Hua; Adolph, Karen.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 878-1892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Comalli, DM, Keen, R, Abraham, ES, Foo, VJ, Lee, MH & Adolph, K 2016, 'The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort', Developmental Psychology, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 878-1892. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000207
Comalli, David M. ; Keen, Rachel ; Abraham, Evelyn S. ; Foo, Victoria J. ; Lee, Mei Hua ; Adolph, Karen. / The development of tool use : Planning for end-state comfort. In: Developmental Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 52, No. 11. pp. 878-1892.
@article{4425a08492de4872a3ff9b3f28a27e8f,
title = "The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort",
abstract = "Some grips on the handle of a tool can be planned on the basis of information directly available in the scene. Other grips, however, must be planned on the basis of the final position of the hand. {"}End-state comfort{"} grips require an awkward or uncomfortable initial grip so as to later implement the action comfortably and efficiently. From a cognitive perspective, planning for end-state comfort requires a consistent representation of the entire action sequence, including the latter part, which is not based on information directly available in the scene. Many investigators have found that young children fail to demonstrate planning for end-state comfort and that adultlike performance does not appear until about 12 years of age. In 2 experiments, we used a hammering task that engaged children in a goal-directed action with multiple steps. We assessed end-state-comfort planning in novel ways by measuring children's hand choice, grip choice, and tool implementation over multiple trials. The hammering task also uniquely allowed us to assess the efficiency of implementation. We replicated the previous developmental trend in 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old children with our novel task. Most important, our data revealed that 4-year-olds are in a transitional stage during which several competing strategies were exhibited during a single session. Preschoolers changed their grip within trials and across trials, indicating awareness of errors and a willingness to sacrifice speed for more efficient implementation. The end-state-comfort grip initially competes as one grip type among many but gradually displaces all others. Children's sensitivity to costs and drive for efficiency may motivate this change.",
keywords = "Action planning, End-state comfort, Manual skills, Motor development, Tool use",
author = "Comalli, {David M.} and Rachel Keen and Abraham, {Evelyn S.} and Foo, {Victoria J.} and Lee, {Mei Hua} and Karen Adolph",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000207",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "878--1892",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of tool use

T2 - Planning for end-state comfort

AU - Comalli, David M.

AU - Keen, Rachel

AU - Abraham, Evelyn S.

AU - Foo, Victoria J.

AU - Lee, Mei Hua

AU - Adolph, Karen

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Some grips on the handle of a tool can be planned on the basis of information directly available in the scene. Other grips, however, must be planned on the basis of the final position of the hand. "End-state comfort" grips require an awkward or uncomfortable initial grip so as to later implement the action comfortably and efficiently. From a cognitive perspective, planning for end-state comfort requires a consistent representation of the entire action sequence, including the latter part, which is not based on information directly available in the scene. Many investigators have found that young children fail to demonstrate planning for end-state comfort and that adultlike performance does not appear until about 12 years of age. In 2 experiments, we used a hammering task that engaged children in a goal-directed action with multiple steps. We assessed end-state-comfort planning in novel ways by measuring children's hand choice, grip choice, and tool implementation over multiple trials. The hammering task also uniquely allowed us to assess the efficiency of implementation. We replicated the previous developmental trend in 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old children with our novel task. Most important, our data revealed that 4-year-olds are in a transitional stage during which several competing strategies were exhibited during a single session. Preschoolers changed their grip within trials and across trials, indicating awareness of errors and a willingness to sacrifice speed for more efficient implementation. The end-state-comfort grip initially competes as one grip type among many but gradually displaces all others. Children's sensitivity to costs and drive for efficiency may motivate this change.

AB - Some grips on the handle of a tool can be planned on the basis of information directly available in the scene. Other grips, however, must be planned on the basis of the final position of the hand. "End-state comfort" grips require an awkward or uncomfortable initial grip so as to later implement the action comfortably and efficiently. From a cognitive perspective, planning for end-state comfort requires a consistent representation of the entire action sequence, including the latter part, which is not based on information directly available in the scene. Many investigators have found that young children fail to demonstrate planning for end-state comfort and that adultlike performance does not appear until about 12 years of age. In 2 experiments, we used a hammering task that engaged children in a goal-directed action with multiple steps. We assessed end-state-comfort planning in novel ways by measuring children's hand choice, grip choice, and tool implementation over multiple trials. The hammering task also uniquely allowed us to assess the efficiency of implementation. We replicated the previous developmental trend in 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old children with our novel task. Most important, our data revealed that 4-year-olds are in a transitional stage during which several competing strategies were exhibited during a single session. Preschoolers changed their grip within trials and across trials, indicating awareness of errors and a willingness to sacrifice speed for more efficient implementation. The end-state-comfort grip initially competes as one grip type among many but gradually displaces all others. Children's sensitivity to costs and drive for efficiency may motivate this change.

KW - Action planning

KW - End-state comfort

KW - Manual skills

KW - Motor development

KW - Tool use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992623492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992623492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000207

DO - 10.1037/dev0000207

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 878

EP - 1892

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 11

ER -