The dentition of the earliest modern humans: How ‘modern’ are they?

Shara Bailey, Timothy D. Weaver, Jean Jacques Hublin

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    African and Western Asian contemporaries of Neanderthals, generally considered to be the earliest Homo sapiens, are not particularly ‘modern’ looking in their cranial anatomy. Here we test whether the dental morphological signal agrees with this assessment. We used a Bayesian statistical approach to classifying individuals into ‘modern’ and ‘non-modern’ groups based on dental non-metric traits. The classification was based on dental trait frequencies for two ‘known’ samples of 109 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and 129 Neanderthal individuals. A cross-validation test of these individuals correctly classified them 95% of the time. Our early H. sapiens sample included 41 individuals from Southern Africa, Northern Africa and Western Asia. We treated our early H. sapiens individuals as ‘unknown’ and calculated the probability that each belonged to either the Upper Paleolithic or Neanderthal sample. We hypothesized that if the earliest H. sapiens were already dentally modern, then they would be assigned to the Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens group. We also hypothesized that if there had been significant admixture in Western Asia during the initial dispersal out of Africa, these samples would have the largest proportion of individuals classified as Neanderthal. Our results indicated that the latter was not the case. The smallest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Western Asia (7%) and the highest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Northern Africa (38%). In most cases it appears to be the predominance of primitive features, rather than derived Neanderthal traits that drove the classification. We conclude (1) by the time the earliest H. sapiens dispersed from Africa they had already attained a more-or-less modern dental pattern; (2) in the past, as is the case today, Late Pleistocene Africans were not a homogeneous group, some retained primitive dental traits in higher proportions than others. Furthermore, we acknowledge that while our method is an excellent tool for discriminating between Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and Neanderthals, it may not be appropriate for testing Neanderthal – H. sapiens admixture because all traits (primitive and derived) are weighed equally. Moreover, to best assess admixture it is likely necessary to incorporate a model for how the traits track population history and/or gene flow.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationHuman Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages215-232
    Number of pages18
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

    Publication series

    NameVertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
    Number9783319466446
    ISSN (Print)1877-9077

    Fingerprint

    Neanderthal
    dentition
    teeth
    Paleolithic
    Northern Africa
    Homo sapiens
    sampling
    anatomy
    gene flow
    testing
    Southern Africa
    Pleistocene
    Africa
    history

    Keywords

    • Bayesian approach
    • Dental modernity
    • Homo sapiens
    • Neanderthals
    • Qafzeh
    • Skhul

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Palaeontology
    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Ecology

    Cite this

    Bailey, S., Weaver, T. D., & Hublin, J. J. (2017). The dentition of the earliest modern humans: How ‘modern’ are they? In Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak (pp. 215-232). (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; No. 9783319466446). Springer . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16

    The dentition of the earliest modern humans : How ‘modern’ are they? / Bailey, Shara; Weaver, Timothy D.; Hublin, Jean Jacques.

    Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak. Springer , 2017. p. 215-232 (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; No. 9783319466446).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Bailey, S, Weaver, TD & Hublin, JJ 2017, The dentition of the earliest modern humans: How ‘modern’ are they? in Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, no. 9783319466446, Springer , pp. 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16
    Bailey S, Weaver TD, Hublin JJ. The dentition of the earliest modern humans: How ‘modern’ are they? In Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak. Springer . 2017. p. 215-232. (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; 9783319466446). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16
    Bailey, Shara ; Weaver, Timothy D. ; Hublin, Jean Jacques. / The dentition of the earliest modern humans : How ‘modern’ are they?. Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak. Springer , 2017. pp. 215-232 (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; 9783319466446).
    @inbook{821666b2582e40f1b22946516573a99e,
    title = "The dentition of the earliest modern humans: How ‘modern’ are they?",
    abstract = "African and Western Asian contemporaries of Neanderthals, generally considered to be the earliest Homo sapiens, are not particularly ‘modern’ looking in their cranial anatomy. Here we test whether the dental morphological signal agrees with this assessment. We used a Bayesian statistical approach to classifying individuals into ‘modern’ and ‘non-modern’ groups based on dental non-metric traits. The classification was based on dental trait frequencies for two ‘known’ samples of 109 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and 129 Neanderthal individuals. A cross-validation test of these individuals correctly classified them 95{\%} of the time. Our early H. sapiens sample included 41 individuals from Southern Africa, Northern Africa and Western Asia. We treated our early H. sapiens individuals as ‘unknown’ and calculated the probability that each belonged to either the Upper Paleolithic or Neanderthal sample. We hypothesized that if the earliest H. sapiens were already dentally modern, then they would be assigned to the Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens group. We also hypothesized that if there had been significant admixture in Western Asia during the initial dispersal out of Africa, these samples would have the largest proportion of individuals classified as Neanderthal. Our results indicated that the latter was not the case. The smallest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Western Asia (7{\%}) and the highest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Northern Africa (38{\%}). In most cases it appears to be the predominance of primitive features, rather than derived Neanderthal traits that drove the classification. We conclude (1) by the time the earliest H. sapiens dispersed from Africa they had already attained a more-or-less modern dental pattern; (2) in the past, as is the case today, Late Pleistocene Africans were not a homogeneous group, some retained primitive dental traits in higher proportions than others. Furthermore, we acknowledge that while our method is an excellent tool for discriminating between Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and Neanderthals, it may not be appropriate for testing Neanderthal – H. sapiens admixture because all traits (primitive and derived) are weighed equally. Moreover, to best assess admixture it is likely necessary to incorporate a model for how the traits track population history and/or gene flow.",
    keywords = "Bayesian approach, Dental modernity, Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, Qafzeh, Skhul",
    author = "Shara Bailey and Weaver, {Timothy D.} and Hublin, {Jean Jacques}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16",
    language = "English (US)",
    series = "Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "9783319466446",
    pages = "215--232",
    booktitle = "Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - The dentition of the earliest modern humans

    T2 - How ‘modern’ are they?

    AU - Bailey, Shara

    AU - Weaver, Timothy D.

    AU - Hublin, Jean Jacques

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - African and Western Asian contemporaries of Neanderthals, generally considered to be the earliest Homo sapiens, are not particularly ‘modern’ looking in their cranial anatomy. Here we test whether the dental morphological signal agrees with this assessment. We used a Bayesian statistical approach to classifying individuals into ‘modern’ and ‘non-modern’ groups based on dental non-metric traits. The classification was based on dental trait frequencies for two ‘known’ samples of 109 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and 129 Neanderthal individuals. A cross-validation test of these individuals correctly classified them 95% of the time. Our early H. sapiens sample included 41 individuals from Southern Africa, Northern Africa and Western Asia. We treated our early H. sapiens individuals as ‘unknown’ and calculated the probability that each belonged to either the Upper Paleolithic or Neanderthal sample. We hypothesized that if the earliest H. sapiens were already dentally modern, then they would be assigned to the Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens group. We also hypothesized that if there had been significant admixture in Western Asia during the initial dispersal out of Africa, these samples would have the largest proportion of individuals classified as Neanderthal. Our results indicated that the latter was not the case. The smallest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Western Asia (7%) and the highest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Northern Africa (38%). In most cases it appears to be the predominance of primitive features, rather than derived Neanderthal traits that drove the classification. We conclude (1) by the time the earliest H. sapiens dispersed from Africa they had already attained a more-or-less modern dental pattern; (2) in the past, as is the case today, Late Pleistocene Africans were not a homogeneous group, some retained primitive dental traits in higher proportions than others. Furthermore, we acknowledge that while our method is an excellent tool for discriminating between Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and Neanderthals, it may not be appropriate for testing Neanderthal – H. sapiens admixture because all traits (primitive and derived) are weighed equally. Moreover, to best assess admixture it is likely necessary to incorporate a model for how the traits track population history and/or gene flow.

    AB - African and Western Asian contemporaries of Neanderthals, generally considered to be the earliest Homo sapiens, are not particularly ‘modern’ looking in their cranial anatomy. Here we test whether the dental morphological signal agrees with this assessment. We used a Bayesian statistical approach to classifying individuals into ‘modern’ and ‘non-modern’ groups based on dental non-metric traits. The classification was based on dental trait frequencies for two ‘known’ samples of 109 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and 129 Neanderthal individuals. A cross-validation test of these individuals correctly classified them 95% of the time. Our early H. sapiens sample included 41 individuals from Southern Africa, Northern Africa and Western Asia. We treated our early H. sapiens individuals as ‘unknown’ and calculated the probability that each belonged to either the Upper Paleolithic or Neanderthal sample. We hypothesized that if the earliest H. sapiens were already dentally modern, then they would be assigned to the Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens group. We also hypothesized that if there had been significant admixture in Western Asia during the initial dispersal out of Africa, these samples would have the largest proportion of individuals classified as Neanderthal. Our results indicated that the latter was not the case. The smallest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Western Asia (7%) and the highest proportion of misclassified individuals came from Northern Africa (38%). In most cases it appears to be the predominance of primitive features, rather than derived Neanderthal traits that drove the classification. We conclude (1) by the time the earliest H. sapiens dispersed from Africa they had already attained a more-or-less modern dental pattern; (2) in the past, as is the case today, Late Pleistocene Africans were not a homogeneous group, some retained primitive dental traits in higher proportions than others. Furthermore, we acknowledge that while our method is an excellent tool for discriminating between Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens and Neanderthals, it may not be appropriate for testing Neanderthal – H. sapiens admixture because all traits (primitive and derived) are weighed equally. Moreover, to best assess admixture it is likely necessary to incorporate a model for how the traits track population history and/or gene flow.

    KW - Bayesian approach

    KW - Dental modernity

    KW - Homo sapiens

    KW - Neanderthals

    KW - Qafzeh

    KW - Skhul

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040991256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040991256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16

    DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_16

    M3 - Chapter

    T3 - Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology

    SP - 215

    EP - 232

    BT - Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Contributions in Honor of Yoel Rak

    PB - Springer

    ER -