The defense mechanisms inventory: Theoretical and psychometric implications

Samuel Juni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Defense mechanisms and object relations have been increasingly featured in the recent literature on personality and interpersonal behavior. The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has become popular as a reference tool in many of these studies. Recent theoretical analyses have elaborated the differential conceptualization of defense from drive theory and object relations perspectives (Juni, 1997). These perspectives are used as counterpoints to analyze relevant constructs of the DMI and their underlying premises. A meta-analysis of convergent validity data is presented, supporting the rationale of the composite object relations measure of the instrument. Inadequacies in defense operationalization inherent in the DMI are reviewed, with particular stress on confounding measurement effects. Psychometric implications of the ipsative nature of the instrument are outlined. The notion of aggression as a defense is explored in context of the unique dynamic status of intropunitiveness, especially as it impacts on defense theory and the factor structure of the instrument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-332
Number of pages20
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume17
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Defense Mechanisms
Psychometrics
Equipment and Supplies
Aggression
Personality
Meta-Analysis
Object Attachment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The defense mechanisms inventory : Theoretical and psychometric implications. / Juni, Samuel.

In: Current Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1998, p. 313-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e5e3efb8905a41eba62dc9f6686d3d52,
title = "The defense mechanisms inventory: Theoretical and psychometric implications",
abstract = "Defense mechanisms and object relations have been increasingly featured in the recent literature on personality and interpersonal behavior. The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has become popular as a reference tool in many of these studies. Recent theoretical analyses have elaborated the differential conceptualization of defense from drive theory and object relations perspectives (Juni, 1997). These perspectives are used as counterpoints to analyze relevant constructs of the DMI and their underlying premises. A meta-analysis of convergent validity data is presented, supporting the rationale of the composite object relations measure of the instrument. Inadequacies in defense operationalization inherent in the DMI are reviewed, with particular stress on confounding measurement effects. Psychometric implications of the ipsative nature of the instrument are outlined. The notion of aggression as a defense is explored in context of the unique dynamic status of intropunitiveness, especially as it impacts on defense theory and the factor structure of the instrument.",
author = "Samuel Juni",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "313--332",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "0737-8262",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The defense mechanisms inventory

T2 - Theoretical and psychometric implications

AU - Juni, Samuel

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Defense mechanisms and object relations have been increasingly featured in the recent literature on personality and interpersonal behavior. The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has become popular as a reference tool in many of these studies. Recent theoretical analyses have elaborated the differential conceptualization of defense from drive theory and object relations perspectives (Juni, 1997). These perspectives are used as counterpoints to analyze relevant constructs of the DMI and their underlying premises. A meta-analysis of convergent validity data is presented, supporting the rationale of the composite object relations measure of the instrument. Inadequacies in defense operationalization inherent in the DMI are reviewed, with particular stress on confounding measurement effects. Psychometric implications of the ipsative nature of the instrument are outlined. The notion of aggression as a defense is explored in context of the unique dynamic status of intropunitiveness, especially as it impacts on defense theory and the factor structure of the instrument.

AB - Defense mechanisms and object relations have been increasingly featured in the recent literature on personality and interpersonal behavior. The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has become popular as a reference tool in many of these studies. Recent theoretical analyses have elaborated the differential conceptualization of defense from drive theory and object relations perspectives (Juni, 1997). These perspectives are used as counterpoints to analyze relevant constructs of the DMI and their underlying premises. A meta-analysis of convergent validity data is presented, supporting the rationale of the composite object relations measure of the instrument. Inadequacies in defense operationalization inherent in the DMI are reviewed, with particular stress on confounding measurement effects. Psychometric implications of the ipsative nature of the instrument are outlined. The notion of aggression as a defense is explored in context of the unique dynamic status of intropunitiveness, especially as it impacts on defense theory and the factor structure of the instrument.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24044554447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24044554447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 313

EP - 332

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 0737-8262

IS - 4

ER -