The current limits of calorie labeling and the potential for population health impact

Andrew Breck, Tod Mijanovich, Beth Weitzman, Brian D. Elbel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

By mid-2018, federal policy will require chain restaurants with more than 20 U.S. locations to include calorie information on their menus. Despite high expectations that this policy would encourage healthier eating, most studies of local policies to mandate calorie labels have demonstrated little impact on consumer choice. In this article, the authors adapt Burton and Kees 's (2012) conceptual framework for eating behavior change to better understand the limited impact of these policies thus far. Using two surveys of fast-food consumers in Philadelphia, the authors estimate the percentage who might reasonably be expected to respond to calorie labels given the requirements of the Burton and Kees model. They find that as few as 8% of fast-food consumers meet all the model s requirements and, therefore, would be expected to change their eating behavior as a result of calorie information. The authors use the model and findings to consider how calorie-labeling policy could be improved for greater impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-235
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Public Policy and Marketing
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Health impact
Labeling
Population health
Eating behavior
Fast food
Consumer choice
Mandate
Menu
Conceptual framework
Healthy eating
Chain restaurant
Behavior change

Keywords

  • Calorie labeling
  • Menu labeling
  • Nutrition
  • Restaurant chain nutrition labels
  • U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

The current limits of calorie labeling and the potential for population health impact. / Breck, Andrew; Mijanovich, Tod; Weitzman, Beth; Elbel, Brian D.

In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.09.2017, p. 227-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b2fd203a63a4c12856a186b8537ba90,
title = "The current limits of calorie labeling and the potential for population health impact",
abstract = "By mid-2018, federal policy will require chain restaurants with more than 20 U.S. locations to include calorie information on their menus. Despite high expectations that this policy would encourage healthier eating, most studies of local policies to mandate calorie labels have demonstrated little impact on consumer choice. In this article, the authors adapt Burton and Kees 's (2012) conceptual framework for eating behavior change to better understand the limited impact of these policies thus far. Using two surveys of fast-food consumers in Philadelphia, the authors estimate the percentage who might reasonably be expected to respond to calorie labels given the requirements of the Burton and Kees model. They find that as few as 8{\%} of fast-food consumers meet all the model s requirements and, therefore, would be expected to change their eating behavior as a result of calorie information. The authors use the model and findings to consider how calorie-labeling policy could be improved for greater impact.",
keywords = "Calorie labeling, Menu labeling, Nutrition, Restaurant chain nutrition labels, U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act",
author = "Andrew Breck and Tod Mijanovich and Beth Weitzman and Elbel, {Brian D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1509/jppm.16.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "227--235",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy and Marketing",
issn = "0743-9156",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The current limits of calorie labeling and the potential for population health impact

AU - Breck, Andrew

AU - Mijanovich, Tod

AU - Weitzman, Beth

AU - Elbel, Brian D.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - By mid-2018, federal policy will require chain restaurants with more than 20 U.S. locations to include calorie information on their menus. Despite high expectations that this policy would encourage healthier eating, most studies of local policies to mandate calorie labels have demonstrated little impact on consumer choice. In this article, the authors adapt Burton and Kees 's (2012) conceptual framework for eating behavior change to better understand the limited impact of these policies thus far. Using two surveys of fast-food consumers in Philadelphia, the authors estimate the percentage who might reasonably be expected to respond to calorie labels given the requirements of the Burton and Kees model. They find that as few as 8% of fast-food consumers meet all the model s requirements and, therefore, would be expected to change their eating behavior as a result of calorie information. The authors use the model and findings to consider how calorie-labeling policy could be improved for greater impact.

AB - By mid-2018, federal policy will require chain restaurants with more than 20 U.S. locations to include calorie information on their menus. Despite high expectations that this policy would encourage healthier eating, most studies of local policies to mandate calorie labels have demonstrated little impact on consumer choice. In this article, the authors adapt Burton and Kees 's (2012) conceptual framework for eating behavior change to better understand the limited impact of these policies thus far. Using two surveys of fast-food consumers in Philadelphia, the authors estimate the percentage who might reasonably be expected to respond to calorie labels given the requirements of the Burton and Kees model. They find that as few as 8% of fast-food consumers meet all the model s requirements and, therefore, would be expected to change their eating behavior as a result of calorie information. The authors use the model and findings to consider how calorie-labeling policy could be improved for greater impact.

KW - Calorie labeling

KW - Menu labeling

KW - Nutrition

KW - Restaurant chain nutrition labels

KW - U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040174745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040174745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1509/jppm.16.005

DO - 10.1509/jppm.16.005

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 227

EP - 235

JO - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

JF - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

SN - 0743-9156

IS - 2

ER -