The Concrete Substrates of Abstract Rule Use

Bradley C. Love, Marc Tomlinson, Todd M. Gureckis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

We live in a world consisting of concrete experiences, yet we appear to form abstractions that transcend the details of our experiences. In this contribution, we argue that the abstract nature of our thought is overstated and that our representations are inherently bound to the examples we experience during learning. We present three lines of related research to support this general point. The first line of research suggests that there are no separate learning systems for acquiring mental rules and storing exceptions to these rules. Instead, both items types share a common representational substrate that is grounded in experienced training examples. The second line of research suggests that representations of abstract concepts, such as same and different that can range over an unbounded set of stimulus properties, are rooted in experienced examples coupled with analogical processes. Finally, we consider how people perform in dynamic decision tasks in which short- and long-term rewards are in opposition. Rather than invoking explicit reasoning processes and planning, people's performance is best explained by reinforcement learning procedures that update estimates of action values in a reactive, trial-by-trial fashion. All three lines of research implicate mechanisms of thought that are capable of broad generalization, yet inherently local in terms of the procedures used for updating mental representations and planning future actions. We end by considering the benefits of designing systems that operate according to these principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Research and Theory
EditorsBrian Ross
Pages167-207
Number of pages41
DOIs
StatePublished - May 13 2008

Publication series

NamePsychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
Volume49
ISSN (Print)0079-7421

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Love, B. C., Tomlinson, M., & Gureckis, T. M. (2008). The Concrete Substrates of Abstract Rule Use. In B. Ross (Ed.), Advances in Research and Theory (pp. 167-207). (Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory; Vol. 49). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00005-4