The conclusion of practical reasoning: The shadow between idea and act

Sarah Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a puzzle about how to understand the conclusion of a successful instance of practical reasoning. Do the considerations adduced in reasoning rationalize the particular doing of an action, as Aristotle is sometimes interpreted as claiming? Or does reasoning conclude in the formation of an attitude-an intention, say-that has an action-type as its content? This paper attempts to clarify what is at stake in that debate and defends the latter view against some of its critics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-302
Number of pages16
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2013

Fingerprint

Practical Reasoning
Aristotle
Intentions

Keywords

  • Action
  • Intention
  • Practical reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

The conclusion of practical reasoning : The shadow between idea and act. / Paul, Sarah.

In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, No. 3, 04.05.2013, p. 287-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25be1c24e23a4e9a8ade09a2b8fd724e,
title = "The conclusion of practical reasoning: The shadow between idea and act",
abstract = "There is a puzzle about how to understand the conclusion of a successful instance of practical reasoning. Do the considerations adduced in reasoning rationalize the particular doing of an action, as Aristotle is sometimes interpreted as claiming? Or does reasoning conclude in the formation of an attitude-an intention, say-that has an action-type as its content? This paper attempts to clarify what is at stake in that debate and defends the latter view against some of its critics.",
keywords = "Action, Intention, Practical reasoning",
author = "Sarah Paul",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00455091.2013.847345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "287--302",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "0045-5091",
publisher = "University of Lethbridge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conclusion of practical reasoning

T2 - The shadow between idea and act

AU - Paul, Sarah

PY - 2013/5/4

Y1 - 2013/5/4

N2 - There is a puzzle about how to understand the conclusion of a successful instance of practical reasoning. Do the considerations adduced in reasoning rationalize the particular doing of an action, as Aristotle is sometimes interpreted as claiming? Or does reasoning conclude in the formation of an attitude-an intention, say-that has an action-type as its content? This paper attempts to clarify what is at stake in that debate and defends the latter view against some of its critics.

AB - There is a puzzle about how to understand the conclusion of a successful instance of practical reasoning. Do the considerations adduced in reasoning rationalize the particular doing of an action, as Aristotle is sometimes interpreted as claiming? Or does reasoning conclude in the formation of an attitude-an intention, say-that has an action-type as its content? This paper attempts to clarify what is at stake in that debate and defends the latter view against some of its critics.

KW - Action

KW - Intention

KW - Practical reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890921297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890921297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00455091.2013.847345

DO - 10.1080/00455091.2013.847345

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84890921297

VL - 43

SP - 287

EP - 302

JO - Canadian Journal of Philosophy

JF - Canadian Journal of Philosophy

SN - 0045-5091

IS - 3

ER -