The conceptual structure of face impressions

Ryan M. Stolier, Eric Hehman, Matthias D. Keller, Mirella Walker, Jonathan Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humans seamlessly infer the expanse of personality traits from others’ facial appearance. These facial impressions are highly intercorrelated within a structure known as “face trait space.” Research has extensively documented the facial features that underlie face impressions, thus outlining a bottom-up fixed architecture of face impressions, which cannot account for important ways impressions vary across perceivers. Classic theory in impression formation emphasized that perceivers use their lay conceptual beliefs about how personality traits correlate to form initial trait impressions, for instance, where trustworthiness of a target may inform impressions of their intelligence to the extent one believes the two traits are related. This considered, we explore the possibility that this lay “conceptual trait space”—how perceivers believe personality traits correlate in others—plays a role in face impressions, tethering face impressions to one another, thus shaping face trait space. In study 1, we found that conceptual and face trait space explain considerable variance in each other. In study 2, we found that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits judged those traits more similarly in faces. Importantly, using a face image classification task, we found in study 3 that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits used more similar facial features to make those two face trait impressions. Together, these findings suggest lay beliefs of how personality traits correlate may underlie trait impressions, and thus face trait space. This implies face impressions are not only derived bottom up from facial features, but also shaped by our conceptual beliefs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9210-9215
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume115
Issue number37
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2018

Fingerprint

Personality
Intelligence
Research

Keywords

  • Conceptual knowledge
  • Face perception
  • Implicit personality theory
  • Impression formation
  • Social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

The conceptual structure of face impressions. / Stolier, Ryan M.; Hehman, Eric; Keller, Matthias D.; Walker, Mirella; Freeman, Jonathan.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, No. 37, 11.09.2018, p. 9210-9215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stolier, Ryan M. ; Hehman, Eric ; Keller, Matthias D. ; Walker, Mirella ; Freeman, Jonathan. / The conceptual structure of face impressions. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018 ; Vol. 115, No. 37. pp. 9210-9215.
@article{991b13561b984164a2a364dd34f6b7de,
title = "The conceptual structure of face impressions",
abstract = "Humans seamlessly infer the expanse of personality traits from others’ facial appearance. These facial impressions are highly intercorrelated within a structure known as “face trait space.” Research has extensively documented the facial features that underlie face impressions, thus outlining a bottom-up fixed architecture of face impressions, which cannot account for important ways impressions vary across perceivers. Classic theory in impression formation emphasized that perceivers use their lay conceptual beliefs about how personality traits correlate to form initial trait impressions, for instance, where trustworthiness of a target may inform impressions of their intelligence to the extent one believes the two traits are related. This considered, we explore the possibility that this lay “conceptual trait space”—how perceivers believe personality traits correlate in others—plays a role in face impressions, tethering face impressions to one another, thus shaping face trait space. In study 1, we found that conceptual and face trait space explain considerable variance in each other. In study 2, we found that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits judged those traits more similarly in faces. Importantly, using a face image classification task, we found in study 3 that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits used more similar facial features to make those two face trait impressions. Together, these findings suggest lay beliefs of how personality traits correlate may underlie trait impressions, and thus face trait space. This implies face impressions are not only derived bottom up from facial features, but also shaped by our conceptual beliefs.",
keywords = "Conceptual knowledge, Face perception, Implicit personality theory, Impression formation, Social cognition",
author = "Stolier, {Ryan M.} and Eric Hehman and Keller, {Matthias D.} and Mirella Walker and Jonathan Freeman",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1807222115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "9210--9215",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "37",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conceptual structure of face impressions

AU - Stolier, Ryan M.

AU - Hehman, Eric

AU - Keller, Matthias D.

AU - Walker, Mirella

AU - Freeman, Jonathan

PY - 2018/9/11

Y1 - 2018/9/11

N2 - Humans seamlessly infer the expanse of personality traits from others’ facial appearance. These facial impressions are highly intercorrelated within a structure known as “face trait space.” Research has extensively documented the facial features that underlie face impressions, thus outlining a bottom-up fixed architecture of face impressions, which cannot account for important ways impressions vary across perceivers. Classic theory in impression formation emphasized that perceivers use their lay conceptual beliefs about how personality traits correlate to form initial trait impressions, for instance, where trustworthiness of a target may inform impressions of their intelligence to the extent one believes the two traits are related. This considered, we explore the possibility that this lay “conceptual trait space”—how perceivers believe personality traits correlate in others—plays a role in face impressions, tethering face impressions to one another, thus shaping face trait space. In study 1, we found that conceptual and face trait space explain considerable variance in each other. In study 2, we found that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits judged those traits more similarly in faces. Importantly, using a face image classification task, we found in study 3 that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits used more similar facial features to make those two face trait impressions. Together, these findings suggest lay beliefs of how personality traits correlate may underlie trait impressions, and thus face trait space. This implies face impressions are not only derived bottom up from facial features, but also shaped by our conceptual beliefs.

AB - Humans seamlessly infer the expanse of personality traits from others’ facial appearance. These facial impressions are highly intercorrelated within a structure known as “face trait space.” Research has extensively documented the facial features that underlie face impressions, thus outlining a bottom-up fixed architecture of face impressions, which cannot account for important ways impressions vary across perceivers. Classic theory in impression formation emphasized that perceivers use their lay conceptual beliefs about how personality traits correlate to form initial trait impressions, for instance, where trustworthiness of a target may inform impressions of their intelligence to the extent one believes the two traits are related. This considered, we explore the possibility that this lay “conceptual trait space”—how perceivers believe personality traits correlate in others—plays a role in face impressions, tethering face impressions to one another, thus shaping face trait space. In study 1, we found that conceptual and face trait space explain considerable variance in each other. In study 2, we found that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits judged those traits more similarly in faces. Importantly, using a face image classification task, we found in study 3 that participants with stronger conceptual associations between two traits used more similar facial features to make those two face trait impressions. Together, these findings suggest lay beliefs of how personality traits correlate may underlie trait impressions, and thus face trait space. This implies face impressions are not only derived bottom up from facial features, but also shaped by our conceptual beliefs.

KW - Conceptual knowledge

KW - Face perception

KW - Implicit personality theory

KW - Impression formation

KW - Social cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052995189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052995189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1807222115

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1807222115

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 9210

EP - 9215

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 37

ER -