The conceptual and empirical framework

Nathan Goldschlag, Julia Ingrid Lane, Bruce Weinberg, Nikolas Zolas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction The goal of this book is to build a better understanding of how returns to research are generated. That understanding is facilitated here by creating explicit linkages between what is funded, who is funded, and the results. This chapter spells out the conceptual and empirical basis of the approach on which the book is grounded and provides a roadmap to the rest of the book. The core insight that drives our approach is importance of the people – students, principal investigators, postdoctoral researchers, and research staff – who conduct research, create new knowledge, and transmit that knowledge into the broader economy (1). Much has been made of the role of documents – like papers and patents – but this chapter instead builds on Oppenheimer's insight that the best way to send knowledge is to wrap it up in a person (2). Indeed, the regional economic activity surrounding universities strongly suggests that regionally bound human beings, not globally accessible documents, are the key to understanding economic impact. The conceptual framework is straightforward. Undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows employed as part of scientific projects obtain valuable training while at the same time creating new knowledge that can be transmitted to their employers once their training is complete. The gains that result from the application of knowledge acquired through research and training accrue to both the employing firm and the workers. Researchers create new ideas that either directly generate new businesses or are transmitted through social and scientific networks to the private sector. Propinquity is a major driver of these effects (3). The empirical framework mirrors the conceptual framework. It uses university data on grant expenditures to characterize who is working on which grants, then traces their subsequent activity through matches with administrative data from the universities, US Census Bureau and other sources. This approach permits new insights into the impact of science. The size of the dataset is large enough to examine outcomes of quite narrowly defined fields, such as food safety research, or different demographic groups. The link to Census Bureau data opens a whole host of possibilities. With these data, one can describe the arc of a scientific career or trace economic impact over time and on an ongoing basis. It is now possible to describe real economic impact, because identifying comparison groups has become feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMeasuring the Economic Value of Research
Subtitle of host publicationThe Case of Food Safety
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages51-68
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781316671788
ISBN (Print)9781107159693
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

economic impact
grant
university
census
safety research
human being
student
patent
knowledge
private sector
employer
expenditures
Group
driver
graduate
career
food
staff
firm
worker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Goldschlag, N., Lane, J. I., Weinberg, B., & Zolas, N. (2017). The conceptual and empirical framework. In Measuring the Economic Value of Research: The Case of Food Safety (pp. 51-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671788.004

The conceptual and empirical framework. / Goldschlag, Nathan; Lane, Julia Ingrid; Weinberg, Bruce; Zolas, Nikolas.

Measuring the Economic Value of Research: The Case of Food Safety. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 51-68.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Goldschlag, N, Lane, JI, Weinberg, B & Zolas, N 2017, The conceptual and empirical framework. in Measuring the Economic Value of Research: The Case of Food Safety. Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671788.004
Goldschlag N, Lane JI, Weinberg B, Zolas N. The conceptual and empirical framework. In Measuring the Economic Value of Research: The Case of Food Safety. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 51-68 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671788.004
Goldschlag, Nathan ; Lane, Julia Ingrid ; Weinberg, Bruce ; Zolas, Nikolas. / The conceptual and empirical framework. Measuring the Economic Value of Research: The Case of Food Safety. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 51-68
@inbook{943e9d0ca39b4fbebaea2e9fff35acda,
title = "The conceptual and empirical framework",
abstract = "Introduction The goal of this book is to build a better understanding of how returns to research are generated. That understanding is facilitated here by creating explicit linkages between what is funded, who is funded, and the results. This chapter spells out the conceptual and empirical basis of the approach on which the book is grounded and provides a roadmap to the rest of the book. The core insight that drives our approach is importance of the people – students, principal investigators, postdoctoral researchers, and research staff – who conduct research, create new knowledge, and transmit that knowledge into the broader economy (1). Much has been made of the role of documents – like papers and patents – but this chapter instead builds on Oppenheimer's insight that the best way to send knowledge is to wrap it up in a person (2). Indeed, the regional economic activity surrounding universities strongly suggests that regionally bound human beings, not globally accessible documents, are the key to understanding economic impact. The conceptual framework is straightforward. Undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows employed as part of scientific projects obtain valuable training while at the same time creating new knowledge that can be transmitted to their employers once their training is complete. The gains that result from the application of knowledge acquired through research and training accrue to both the employing firm and the workers. Researchers create new ideas that either directly generate new businesses or are transmitted through social and scientific networks to the private sector. Propinquity is a major driver of these effects (3). The empirical framework mirrors the conceptual framework. It uses university data on grant expenditures to characterize who is working on which grants, then traces their subsequent activity through matches with administrative data from the universities, US Census Bureau and other sources. This approach permits new insights into the impact of science. The size of the dataset is large enough to examine outcomes of quite narrowly defined fields, such as food safety research, or different demographic groups. The link to Census Bureau data opens a whole host of possibilities. With these data, one can describe the arc of a scientific career or trace economic impact over time and on an ongoing basis. It is now possible to describe real economic impact, because identifying comparison groups has become feasible.",
author = "Nathan Goldschlag and Lane, {Julia Ingrid} and Bruce Weinberg and Nikolas Zolas",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781316671788.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107159693",
pages = "51--68",
booktitle = "Measuring the Economic Value of Research",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The conceptual and empirical framework

AU - Goldschlag, Nathan

AU - Lane, Julia Ingrid

AU - Weinberg, Bruce

AU - Zolas, Nikolas

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction The goal of this book is to build a better understanding of how returns to research are generated. That understanding is facilitated here by creating explicit linkages between what is funded, who is funded, and the results. This chapter spells out the conceptual and empirical basis of the approach on which the book is grounded and provides a roadmap to the rest of the book. The core insight that drives our approach is importance of the people – students, principal investigators, postdoctoral researchers, and research staff – who conduct research, create new knowledge, and transmit that knowledge into the broader economy (1). Much has been made of the role of documents – like papers and patents – but this chapter instead builds on Oppenheimer's insight that the best way to send knowledge is to wrap it up in a person (2). Indeed, the regional economic activity surrounding universities strongly suggests that regionally bound human beings, not globally accessible documents, are the key to understanding economic impact. The conceptual framework is straightforward. Undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows employed as part of scientific projects obtain valuable training while at the same time creating new knowledge that can be transmitted to their employers once their training is complete. The gains that result from the application of knowledge acquired through research and training accrue to both the employing firm and the workers. Researchers create new ideas that either directly generate new businesses or are transmitted through social and scientific networks to the private sector. Propinquity is a major driver of these effects (3). The empirical framework mirrors the conceptual framework. It uses university data on grant expenditures to characterize who is working on which grants, then traces their subsequent activity through matches with administrative data from the universities, US Census Bureau and other sources. This approach permits new insights into the impact of science. The size of the dataset is large enough to examine outcomes of quite narrowly defined fields, such as food safety research, or different demographic groups. The link to Census Bureau data opens a whole host of possibilities. With these data, one can describe the arc of a scientific career or trace economic impact over time and on an ongoing basis. It is now possible to describe real economic impact, because identifying comparison groups has become feasible.

AB - Introduction The goal of this book is to build a better understanding of how returns to research are generated. That understanding is facilitated here by creating explicit linkages between what is funded, who is funded, and the results. This chapter spells out the conceptual and empirical basis of the approach on which the book is grounded and provides a roadmap to the rest of the book. The core insight that drives our approach is importance of the people – students, principal investigators, postdoctoral researchers, and research staff – who conduct research, create new knowledge, and transmit that knowledge into the broader economy (1). Much has been made of the role of documents – like papers and patents – but this chapter instead builds on Oppenheimer's insight that the best way to send knowledge is to wrap it up in a person (2). Indeed, the regional economic activity surrounding universities strongly suggests that regionally bound human beings, not globally accessible documents, are the key to understanding economic impact. The conceptual framework is straightforward. Undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows employed as part of scientific projects obtain valuable training while at the same time creating new knowledge that can be transmitted to their employers once their training is complete. The gains that result from the application of knowledge acquired through research and training accrue to both the employing firm and the workers. Researchers create new ideas that either directly generate new businesses or are transmitted through social and scientific networks to the private sector. Propinquity is a major driver of these effects (3). The empirical framework mirrors the conceptual framework. It uses university data on grant expenditures to characterize who is working on which grants, then traces their subsequent activity through matches with administrative data from the universities, US Census Bureau and other sources. This approach permits new insights into the impact of science. The size of the dataset is large enough to examine outcomes of quite narrowly defined fields, such as food safety research, or different demographic groups. The link to Census Bureau data opens a whole host of possibilities. With these data, one can describe the arc of a scientific career or trace economic impact over time and on an ongoing basis. It is now possible to describe real economic impact, because identifying comparison groups has become feasible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048150329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048150329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781316671788.004

DO - 10.1017/9781316671788.004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107159693

SP - 51

EP - 68

BT - Measuring the Economic Value of Research

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -