The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio

Nicholas J L Brown, Alan D. Sokal, Harris L. Friedman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We examine critically the claims made by Fredrickson and Losada (2005) concerning the construct known as the "positivity ratio." We find no theoretical or empirical justification for the use of differential equations drawn from fluid dynamics, a subfield of physics, to describe changes in human emotions over time; furthermore, we demonstrate that the purported application of these equations contains numerous fundamental conceptual and mathematical errors. The lack of relevance of these equations and their incorrect application lead us to conclude that Fredrickson and Losada's claim to have demonstrated the existence of a critical minimum positivity ratio of 2.9013 is entirely unfounded. More generally, we urge future researchers to exercise caution in the use of advanced mathematical tools, such as nonlinear dynamics, and in particular to verify that the elementary conditions for their valid application have been met.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)801-813
    Number of pages13
    JournalAmerican Psychologist
    Volume68
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Nonlinear Dynamics
    Physics
    Hydrodynamics
    Emotions
    Research Personnel
    Thinking
    Positivity
    Equations

    Keywords

    • Broaden-and-build theory
    • Lorenz system
    • Nonlinear dynamics
    • Positive psychology
    • Positivity ratio

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    The complex dynamics of wishful thinking : The critical positivity ratio. / Brown, Nicholas J L; Sokal, Alan D.; Friedman, Harris L.

    In: American Psychologist, Vol. 68, No. 9, 12.2013, p. 801-813.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brown, Nicholas J L ; Sokal, Alan D. ; Friedman, Harris L. / The complex dynamics of wishful thinking : The critical positivity ratio. In: American Psychologist. 2013 ; Vol. 68, No. 9. pp. 801-813.
    @article{7c03ea86133a4e489ed76fc285df5dec,
    title = "The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio",
    abstract = "We examine critically the claims made by Fredrickson and Losada (2005) concerning the construct known as the {"}positivity ratio.{"} We find no theoretical or empirical justification for the use of differential equations drawn from fluid dynamics, a subfield of physics, to describe changes in human emotions over time; furthermore, we demonstrate that the purported application of these equations contains numerous fundamental conceptual and mathematical errors. The lack of relevance of these equations and their incorrect application lead us to conclude that Fredrickson and Losada's claim to have demonstrated the existence of a critical minimum positivity ratio of 2.9013 is entirely unfounded. More generally, we urge future researchers to exercise caution in the use of advanced mathematical tools, such as nonlinear dynamics, and in particular to verify that the elementary conditions for their valid application have been met.",
    keywords = "Broaden-and-build theory, Lorenz system, Nonlinear dynamics, Positive psychology, Positivity ratio",
    author = "Brown, {Nicholas J L} and Sokal, {Alan D.} and Friedman, {Harris L.}",
    year = "2013",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1037/a0032850",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "801--813",
    journal = "American Psychologist",
    issn = "0003-066X",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The complex dynamics of wishful thinking

    T2 - The critical positivity ratio

    AU - Brown, Nicholas J L

    AU - Sokal, Alan D.

    AU - Friedman, Harris L.

    PY - 2013/12

    Y1 - 2013/12

    N2 - We examine critically the claims made by Fredrickson and Losada (2005) concerning the construct known as the "positivity ratio." We find no theoretical or empirical justification for the use of differential equations drawn from fluid dynamics, a subfield of physics, to describe changes in human emotions over time; furthermore, we demonstrate that the purported application of these equations contains numerous fundamental conceptual and mathematical errors. The lack of relevance of these equations and their incorrect application lead us to conclude that Fredrickson and Losada's claim to have demonstrated the existence of a critical minimum positivity ratio of 2.9013 is entirely unfounded. More generally, we urge future researchers to exercise caution in the use of advanced mathematical tools, such as nonlinear dynamics, and in particular to verify that the elementary conditions for their valid application have been met.

    AB - We examine critically the claims made by Fredrickson and Losada (2005) concerning the construct known as the "positivity ratio." We find no theoretical or empirical justification for the use of differential equations drawn from fluid dynamics, a subfield of physics, to describe changes in human emotions over time; furthermore, we demonstrate that the purported application of these equations contains numerous fundamental conceptual and mathematical errors. The lack of relevance of these equations and their incorrect application lead us to conclude that Fredrickson and Losada's claim to have demonstrated the existence of a critical minimum positivity ratio of 2.9013 is entirely unfounded. More generally, we urge future researchers to exercise caution in the use of advanced mathematical tools, such as nonlinear dynamics, and in particular to verify that the elementary conditions for their valid application have been met.

    KW - Broaden-and-build theory

    KW - Lorenz system

    KW - Nonlinear dynamics

    KW - Positive psychology

    KW - Positivity ratio

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890783867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890783867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1037/a0032850

    DO - 10.1037/a0032850

    M3 - Article

    VL - 68

    SP - 801

    EP - 813

    JO - American Psychologist

    JF - American Psychologist

    SN - 0003-066X

    IS - 9

    ER -