The color of LGB: Racial and ethnic variations in conceptualizations of sexual minority status

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Recently, demographic research on sexual minorities using large-scale surveys has flourished. Yet, there has been little attention paid to whether common survey measures of sexuality - and the use of these measures - capture important racial/ethnic and sex differences, despite evidence suggesting the existence of racial and ethnic differences in how sexuality is both understood and described. This paper focuses on the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex and sexuality, and asks whether the racial/ethnic compositions of populations are sensitive to definitions of non-heterosexual populations, and whether measures of sexuality change over time, racial/ethnic group and sex. Results show that different definitions of non-heterosexual populations influence estimates of racial/ethnic compositions of groups, and that patterns of identification across age cohorts and time also vary by race/ethnicity and sex. Using different theoretical perspectives, the paper concludes with recommendations of how non-heterosexual populations should be conceptualized in future research using large-scale surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-67
Number of pages22
JournalPopulation Review
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

sexuality
minority
ethnicity
ethnic group
evidence
Group
time

Keywords

  • LGB
  • Measurement
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Cite this

The color of LGB : Racial and ethnic variations in conceptualizations of sexual minority status. / Cherng, Hua Yu Sebastian.

In: Population Review, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2017, p. 46-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bc942b696014489695e7442868db9dae,
title = "The color of LGB: Racial and ethnic variations in conceptualizations of sexual minority status",
abstract = "Recently, demographic research on sexual minorities using large-scale surveys has flourished. Yet, there has been little attention paid to whether common survey measures of sexuality - and the use of these measures - capture important racial/ethnic and sex differences, despite evidence suggesting the existence of racial and ethnic differences in how sexuality is both understood and described. This paper focuses on the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex and sexuality, and asks whether the racial/ethnic compositions of populations are sensitive to definitions of non-heterosexual populations, and whether measures of sexuality change over time, racial/ethnic group and sex. Results show that different definitions of non-heterosexual populations influence estimates of racial/ethnic compositions of groups, and that patterns of identification across age cohorts and time also vary by race/ethnicity and sex. Using different theoretical perspectives, the paper concludes with recommendations of how non-heterosexual populations should be conceptualized in future research using large-scale surveys.",
keywords = "LGB, Measurement, Race/ethnicity, Sexuality",
author = "Cherng, {Hua Yu Sebastian}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1353/prv.2017.0002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "46--67",
journal = "Population Review",
issn = "0032-471X",
publisher = "Indian Institute for Population Studies",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The color of LGB

T2 - Racial and ethnic variations in conceptualizations of sexual minority status

AU - Cherng, Hua Yu Sebastian

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Recently, demographic research on sexual minorities using large-scale surveys has flourished. Yet, there has been little attention paid to whether common survey measures of sexuality - and the use of these measures - capture important racial/ethnic and sex differences, despite evidence suggesting the existence of racial and ethnic differences in how sexuality is both understood and described. This paper focuses on the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex and sexuality, and asks whether the racial/ethnic compositions of populations are sensitive to definitions of non-heterosexual populations, and whether measures of sexuality change over time, racial/ethnic group and sex. Results show that different definitions of non-heterosexual populations influence estimates of racial/ethnic compositions of groups, and that patterns of identification across age cohorts and time also vary by race/ethnicity and sex. Using different theoretical perspectives, the paper concludes with recommendations of how non-heterosexual populations should be conceptualized in future research using large-scale surveys.

AB - Recently, demographic research on sexual minorities using large-scale surveys has flourished. Yet, there has been little attention paid to whether common survey measures of sexuality - and the use of these measures - capture important racial/ethnic and sex differences, despite evidence suggesting the existence of racial and ethnic differences in how sexuality is both understood and described. This paper focuses on the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex and sexuality, and asks whether the racial/ethnic compositions of populations are sensitive to definitions of non-heterosexual populations, and whether measures of sexuality change over time, racial/ethnic group and sex. Results show that different definitions of non-heterosexual populations influence estimates of racial/ethnic compositions of groups, and that patterns of identification across age cohorts and time also vary by race/ethnicity and sex. Using different theoretical perspectives, the paper concludes with recommendations of how non-heterosexual populations should be conceptualized in future research using large-scale surveys.

KW - LGB

KW - Measurement

KW - Race/ethnicity

KW - Sexuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019667610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019667610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/prv.2017.0002

DO - 10.1353/prv.2017.0002

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85019667610

VL - 56

SP - 46

EP - 67

JO - Population Review

JF - Population Review

SN - 0032-471X

IS - 1

ER -