The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question

Faye Ginsburg

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In the nineteenth century, canaries were taken into British mines to detect the potential risk to humans of methane gas, which is odorless but lethal. The sensitivity of this small, delicate bird to an invisible but deadly substance meant that if it died, a risk was present that humans would not have been able to detect. My title plays with the phrase "the canary in the mineshaft" that evolved from this poignant interspecies situation; in this chapter, I explore how scientific and documentary images of disability have served as visible evidence (the "canaries," if you will) of a kind of risk lurking in the Jewish community over the course of the twentieth and into the twenty-first century. The toxic element, in this case, is the stigmatization of the Jewish/disabled body within a particular Gemeinschaft (community), a development in which biomedical discourses are deeply implicated.1 This process is an example of how "Otherness" becomes associated with the risk of danger or marginality, as discussed by cultural studies scholar Deborah Lupton in her book on the ways in which risk is understood in modernity.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationFilm and Risk
    PublisherWayne State University Press
    Pages115-142
    Number of pages28
    ISBN (Print)9780814334638
    StatePublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Jewish Question
    Invisible
    Birds
    Jewish Community
    Discourse
    Visible
    Documentary
    Stigmatization
    Modernity
    Gas
    Otherness
    Danger
    Cultural Studies
    Marginality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Cite this

    Ginsburg, F. (2012). The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question. In Film and Risk (pp. 115-142). Wayne State University Press.

    The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question. / Ginsburg, Faye.

    Film and Risk. Wayne State University Press, 2012. p. 115-142.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Ginsburg, F 2012, The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question. in Film and Risk. Wayne State University Press, pp. 115-142.
    Ginsburg F. The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question. In Film and Risk. Wayne State University Press. 2012. p. 115-142
    Ginsburg, Faye. / The canary in the gemeinschaft? Disability, film, and the Jewish question. Film and Risk. Wayne State University Press, 2012. pp. 115-142
    @inbook{d5623833ebfc48fa840738f1d90daf7d,
    title = "The canary in the gemeinschaft?: Disability, film, and the Jewish question",
    abstract = "In the nineteenth century, canaries were taken into British mines to detect the potential risk to humans of methane gas, which is odorless but lethal. The sensitivity of this small, delicate bird to an invisible but deadly substance meant that if it died, a risk was present that humans would not have been able to detect. My title plays with the phrase {"}the canary in the mineshaft{"} that evolved from this poignant interspecies situation; in this chapter, I explore how scientific and documentary images of disability have served as visible evidence (the {"}canaries,{"} if you will) of a kind of risk lurking in the Jewish community over the course of the twentieth and into the twenty-first century. The toxic element, in this case, is the stigmatization of the Jewish/disabled body within a particular Gemeinschaft (community), a development in which biomedical discourses are deeply implicated.1 This process is an example of how {"}Otherness{"} becomes associated with the risk of danger or marginality, as discussed by cultural studies scholar Deborah Lupton in her book on the ways in which risk is understood in modernity.",
    author = "Faye Ginsburg",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780814334638",
    pages = "115--142",
    booktitle = "Film and Risk",
    publisher = "Wayne State University Press",
    address = "United States",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - The canary in the gemeinschaft?

    T2 - Disability, film, and the Jewish question

    AU - Ginsburg, Faye

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In the nineteenth century, canaries were taken into British mines to detect the potential risk to humans of methane gas, which is odorless but lethal. The sensitivity of this small, delicate bird to an invisible but deadly substance meant that if it died, a risk was present that humans would not have been able to detect. My title plays with the phrase "the canary in the mineshaft" that evolved from this poignant interspecies situation; in this chapter, I explore how scientific and documentary images of disability have served as visible evidence (the "canaries," if you will) of a kind of risk lurking in the Jewish community over the course of the twentieth and into the twenty-first century. The toxic element, in this case, is the stigmatization of the Jewish/disabled body within a particular Gemeinschaft (community), a development in which biomedical discourses are deeply implicated.1 This process is an example of how "Otherness" becomes associated with the risk of danger or marginality, as discussed by cultural studies scholar Deborah Lupton in her book on the ways in which risk is understood in modernity.

    AB - In the nineteenth century, canaries were taken into British mines to detect the potential risk to humans of methane gas, which is odorless but lethal. The sensitivity of this small, delicate bird to an invisible but deadly substance meant that if it died, a risk was present that humans would not have been able to detect. My title plays with the phrase "the canary in the mineshaft" that evolved from this poignant interspecies situation; in this chapter, I explore how scientific and documentary images of disability have served as visible evidence (the "canaries," if you will) of a kind of risk lurking in the Jewish community over the course of the twentieth and into the twenty-first century. The toxic element, in this case, is the stigmatization of the Jewish/disabled body within a particular Gemeinschaft (community), a development in which biomedical discourses are deeply implicated.1 This process is an example of how "Otherness" becomes associated with the risk of danger or marginality, as discussed by cultural studies scholar Deborah Lupton in her book on the ways in which risk is understood in modernity.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904847187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904847187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780814334638

    SP - 115

    EP - 142

    BT - Film and Risk

    PB - Wayne State University Press

    ER -