The anatomy of debate about campaign finance

Ryan Pevnick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The goal of this article is to provide a conceptual overview that highlights the key questions of democratic theory at stake in the debate about campaign finance. It does so in two main steps. First, against the common view that the debate is a one-front confrontation between egalitarians and their opponents, the article outlines three distinct reform positions. These positions aim to eliminate the dependence of public officials on wealthy supporters, equalize citizens' opportunity for political influence, or ensure that advocates of competing positions have equal resources with which to contest elections. Second, the article articulates a challenge faced by advocates of all of the main reform positions: they must show that the ideal for which they advocate can be meaningfully pursued without undermining broader commitments to individual liberty in the background culture. This generates deeper difficulties for the reform movement than ordinarily recognized.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1184-1195
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Politics
    Volume78
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    finance
    campaign
    reform
    reform movement
    political influence
    election
    commitment
    citizen
    resources

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The anatomy of debate about campaign finance. / Pevnick, Ryan.

    In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 78, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 1184-1195.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Pevnick, Ryan. / The anatomy of debate about campaign finance. In: Journal of Politics. 2016 ; Vol. 78, No. 4. pp. 1184-1195.
    @article{9339361a42b24ece84ed15751efea01e,
    title = "The anatomy of debate about campaign finance",
    abstract = "The goal of this article is to provide a conceptual overview that highlights the key questions of democratic theory at stake in the debate about campaign finance. It does so in two main steps. First, against the common view that the debate is a one-front confrontation between egalitarians and their opponents, the article outlines three distinct reform positions. These positions aim to eliminate the dependence of public officials on wealthy supporters, equalize citizens' opportunity for political influence, or ensure that advocates of competing positions have equal resources with which to contest elections. Second, the article articulates a challenge faced by advocates of all of the main reform positions: they must show that the ideal for which they advocate can be meaningfully pursued without undermining broader commitments to individual liberty in the background culture. This generates deeper difficulties for the reform movement than ordinarily recognized.",
    author = "Ryan Pevnick",
    year = "2016",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/686687",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "78",
    pages = "1184--1195",
    journal = "Journal of Politics",
    issn = "0022-3816",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The anatomy of debate about campaign finance

    AU - Pevnick, Ryan

    PY - 2016/10/1

    Y1 - 2016/10/1

    N2 - The goal of this article is to provide a conceptual overview that highlights the key questions of democratic theory at stake in the debate about campaign finance. It does so in two main steps. First, against the common view that the debate is a one-front confrontation between egalitarians and their opponents, the article outlines three distinct reform positions. These positions aim to eliminate the dependence of public officials on wealthy supporters, equalize citizens' opportunity for political influence, or ensure that advocates of competing positions have equal resources with which to contest elections. Second, the article articulates a challenge faced by advocates of all of the main reform positions: they must show that the ideal for which they advocate can be meaningfully pursued without undermining broader commitments to individual liberty in the background culture. This generates deeper difficulties for the reform movement than ordinarily recognized.

    AB - The goal of this article is to provide a conceptual overview that highlights the key questions of democratic theory at stake in the debate about campaign finance. It does so in two main steps. First, against the common view that the debate is a one-front confrontation between egalitarians and their opponents, the article outlines three distinct reform positions. These positions aim to eliminate the dependence of public officials on wealthy supporters, equalize citizens' opportunity for political influence, or ensure that advocates of competing positions have equal resources with which to contest elections. Second, the article articulates a challenge faced by advocates of all of the main reform positions: they must show that the ideal for which they advocate can be meaningfully pursued without undermining broader commitments to individual liberty in the background culture. This generates deeper difficulties for the reform movement than ordinarily recognized.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996537883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996537883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/686687

    DO - 10.1086/686687

    M3 - Article

    VL - 78

    SP - 1184

    EP - 1195

    JO - Journal of Politics

    JF - Journal of Politics

    SN - 0022-3816

    IS - 4

    ER -