The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions

Steven W. Covino, Robin J. Mitnick, Robert J. Shprintzen, George Cisneros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements obtained from three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: Ten rectangular acrylic blocks were prepared with titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) markers spaced from 1 to 10 mm, respectively. A plastic sphere was prepared with 10 sets of TMA markers spaced at variable intervals of 1 to 10 mm. Each object was scanned three times at 3-mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 mm with 0.5 mm overlap slice thicknesses, as well as positioned in the CT scanner in two different directions (perpendicular and parallel) to the scanning beam. Intermarker distances of the reconstructed objects were then measured using the measurement tool of the MediCAD software and compared with measurements taken by hand with a vernier caliper. Results: Using the 3-mm cut protocol, the data indicated that inconsistency exists between intermarker distance in the scans when the rectangular objects were scanned parallel to the scanning beam. This finding was not seen using the 1.5-mm with 0.5-mm overlap slice thickness protocol. The intermarker distances for objects scanned perpendicular to the scanning beam were consistent but subject to demagnification in the range of 17% to 20% for both scanning protocols. Conclusion: The orientation of the object to the scanning beam and slice thickness protocol appear to have an impact on the accuracy and variability of linear measurements taken in the x, y, z axes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)982-991
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume54
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1996

Fingerprint

Dimensional Measurement Accuracy
Tomography
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Plastics
Software
Hand
titanium molybdenum alloy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. / Covino, Steven W.; Mitnick, Robin J.; Shprintzen, Robert J.; Cisneros, George.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 54, No. 8, 08.1996, p. 982-991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Covino, Steven W. ; Mitnick, Robin J. ; Shprintzen, Robert J. ; Cisneros, George. / The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1996 ; Vol. 54, No. 8. pp. 982-991.
@article{b070fb298ba8431397e758d36ab80434,
title = "The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements obtained from three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: Ten rectangular acrylic blocks were prepared with titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) markers spaced from 1 to 10 mm, respectively. A plastic sphere was prepared with 10 sets of TMA markers spaced at variable intervals of 1 to 10 mm. Each object was scanned three times at 3-mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 mm with 0.5 mm overlap slice thicknesses, as well as positioned in the CT scanner in two different directions (perpendicular and parallel) to the scanning beam. Intermarker distances of the reconstructed objects were then measured using the measurement tool of the MediCAD software and compared with measurements taken by hand with a vernier caliper. Results: Using the 3-mm cut protocol, the data indicated that inconsistency exists between intermarker distance in the scans when the rectangular objects were scanned parallel to the scanning beam. This finding was not seen using the 1.5-mm with 0.5-mm overlap slice thickness protocol. The intermarker distances for objects scanned perpendicular to the scanning beam were consistent but subject to demagnification in the range of 17{\%} to 20{\%} for both scanning protocols. Conclusion: The orientation of the object to the scanning beam and slice thickness protocol appear to have an impact on the accuracy and variability of linear measurements taken in the x, y, z axes.",
author = "Covino, {Steven W.} and Mitnick, {Robin J.} and Shprintzen, {Robert J.} and George Cisneros",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90397-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "982--991",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions

AU - Covino, Steven W.

AU - Mitnick, Robin J.

AU - Shprintzen, Robert J.

AU - Cisneros, George

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements obtained from three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: Ten rectangular acrylic blocks were prepared with titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) markers spaced from 1 to 10 mm, respectively. A plastic sphere was prepared with 10 sets of TMA markers spaced at variable intervals of 1 to 10 mm. Each object was scanned three times at 3-mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 mm with 0.5 mm overlap slice thicknesses, as well as positioned in the CT scanner in two different directions (perpendicular and parallel) to the scanning beam. Intermarker distances of the reconstructed objects were then measured using the measurement tool of the MediCAD software and compared with measurements taken by hand with a vernier caliper. Results: Using the 3-mm cut protocol, the data indicated that inconsistency exists between intermarker distance in the scans when the rectangular objects were scanned parallel to the scanning beam. This finding was not seen using the 1.5-mm with 0.5-mm overlap slice thickness protocol. The intermarker distances for objects scanned perpendicular to the scanning beam were consistent but subject to demagnification in the range of 17% to 20% for both scanning protocols. Conclusion: The orientation of the object to the scanning beam and slice thickness protocol appear to have an impact on the accuracy and variability of linear measurements taken in the x, y, z axes.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements obtained from three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: Ten rectangular acrylic blocks were prepared with titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) markers spaced from 1 to 10 mm, respectively. A plastic sphere was prepared with 10 sets of TMA markers spaced at variable intervals of 1 to 10 mm. Each object was scanned three times at 3-mm slice thicknesses and 1.5 mm with 0.5 mm overlap slice thicknesses, as well as positioned in the CT scanner in two different directions (perpendicular and parallel) to the scanning beam. Intermarker distances of the reconstructed objects were then measured using the measurement tool of the MediCAD software and compared with measurements taken by hand with a vernier caliper. Results: Using the 3-mm cut protocol, the data indicated that inconsistency exists between intermarker distance in the scans when the rectangular objects were scanned parallel to the scanning beam. This finding was not seen using the 1.5-mm with 0.5-mm overlap slice thickness protocol. The intermarker distances for objects scanned perpendicular to the scanning beam were consistent but subject to demagnification in the range of 17% to 20% for both scanning protocols. Conclusion: The orientation of the object to the scanning beam and slice thickness protocol appear to have an impact on the accuracy and variability of linear measurements taken in the x, y, z axes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030482502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030482502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90397-3

DO - 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90397-3

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 982

EP - 991

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 8

ER -