Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept

Hart Blanton, James Jaccard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Theories that posit multiplicative relationships between variables are common in psychology. A. G. Greenwald et al. (see record 2002-00351-001) recently presented a theory that explicated relationships between group identification, group attitudes, and self-esteem. Their theory posits a multiplicative relationship between concepts when predicting a criterion variable. Greenwald et al. suggested analytic strategies to test their multiplicative model that researchers might assume are appropriate for testing multiplicative models more generally. The theory and analytic strategies of Greenwald et al. are used as a case study to show the strong measurement assumptions that underlie certain tests of multiplicative models. It is shown that the approach used by Greenwald et al. can lead to declarations of theoretical support when the theory is wrong as well as rejection of the theory when the theory is correct. A simple strategy for testing multiplicative models that makes weaker measurement assumptions than the strategy proposed by Greenwald et al. is suggested and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-169
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Review
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Self Concept
Research Personnel
Psychology
Rejection (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Cross-products
  • Implicit association test
  • Interactions
  • Regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{ae6267d14a994eb8ab16a26748dd2ae9,
title = "Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept",
abstract = "Theories that posit multiplicative relationships between variables are common in psychology. A. G. Greenwald et al. (see record 2002-00351-001) recently presented a theory that explicated relationships between group identification, group attitudes, and self-esteem. Their theory posits a multiplicative relationship between concepts when predicting a criterion variable. Greenwald et al. suggested analytic strategies to test their multiplicative model that researchers might assume are appropriate for testing multiplicative models more generally. The theory and analytic strategies of Greenwald et al. are used as a case study to show the strong measurement assumptions that underlie certain tests of multiplicative models. It is shown that the approach used by Greenwald et al. can lead to declarations of theoretical support when the theory is wrong as well as rejection of the theory when the theory is correct. A simple strategy for testing multiplicative models that makes weaker measurement assumptions than the strategy proposed by Greenwald et al. is suggested and discussed.",
keywords = "Cross-products, Implicit association test, Interactions, Regression",
author = "Hart Blanton and James Jaccard",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.155",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "155--169",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tests of multiplicative models in psychology

T2 - A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Jaccard, James

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Theories that posit multiplicative relationships between variables are common in psychology. A. G. Greenwald et al. (see record 2002-00351-001) recently presented a theory that explicated relationships between group identification, group attitudes, and self-esteem. Their theory posits a multiplicative relationship between concepts when predicting a criterion variable. Greenwald et al. suggested analytic strategies to test their multiplicative model that researchers might assume are appropriate for testing multiplicative models more generally. The theory and analytic strategies of Greenwald et al. are used as a case study to show the strong measurement assumptions that underlie certain tests of multiplicative models. It is shown that the approach used by Greenwald et al. can lead to declarations of theoretical support when the theory is wrong as well as rejection of the theory when the theory is correct. A simple strategy for testing multiplicative models that makes weaker measurement assumptions than the strategy proposed by Greenwald et al. is suggested and discussed.

AB - Theories that posit multiplicative relationships between variables are common in psychology. A. G. Greenwald et al. (see record 2002-00351-001) recently presented a theory that explicated relationships between group identification, group attitudes, and self-esteem. Their theory posits a multiplicative relationship between concepts when predicting a criterion variable. Greenwald et al. suggested analytic strategies to test their multiplicative model that researchers might assume are appropriate for testing multiplicative models more generally. The theory and analytic strategies of Greenwald et al. are used as a case study to show the strong measurement assumptions that underlie certain tests of multiplicative models. It is shown that the approach used by Greenwald et al. can lead to declarations of theoretical support when the theory is wrong as well as rejection of the theory when the theory is correct. A simple strategy for testing multiplicative models that makes weaker measurement assumptions than the strategy proposed by Greenwald et al. is suggested and discussed.

KW - Cross-products

KW - Implicit association test

KW - Interactions

KW - Regression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33244454982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33244454982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.155

DO - 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.155

M3 - Review article

VL - 113

SP - 155

EP - 169

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 1

ER -