Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate.

E. Anderson, P. M. McGovern, L. Kochevar, D. Vesley, Robyn Gershon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The lack of compliance with universal precautions (UP) is well documented across a wide variety of healthcare professions and has been reported both before and after the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Gershon, Karkashian, and Felknor (1994) found that several factors correlated significantly with healthcare workers' lack of compliance with UP, including a measure of organizational safety climate (e.g., the employees' perception of their organizational culture and practices regarding safety). We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 1,746 healthcare workers at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens to assess the validity and reliability of Gershon's measure of safety climate. Findings revealed no relationship between safety climate and employees' gender, age, education, tenure in position, profession, hours worked per day, perceived risk, attitude toward risk, and training. An association was demonstrated between safety climate and (1) healthcare worker compliance with UP and (2) the availability of personal protective equipment, providing support for the construct validity of this measure of safety climate. These findings could be used by occupational health professionals to assess employees' perceptions of the safety culture and practices in the workplace and to guide the institution's risk management efforts in association with U.P.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-24
Number of pages6
JournalJournal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Climate
Reproducibility of Results
Universal Precautions
Safety
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Delivery of Health Care
Organizational Culture
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Safety Management
Risk Management
Occupational Health
Occupational Exposure
Workplace
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate. / Anderson, E.; McGovern, P. M.; Kochevar, L.; Vesley, D.; Gershon, Robyn.

In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 19-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ac0a893d56d49818a795a52dc8cf475,
title = "Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate.",
abstract = "The lack of compliance with universal precautions (UP) is well documented across a wide variety of healthcare professions and has been reported both before and after the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Gershon, Karkashian, and Felknor (1994) found that several factors correlated significantly with healthcare workers' lack of compliance with UP, including a measure of organizational safety climate (e.g., the employees' perception of their organizational culture and practices regarding safety). We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 1,746 healthcare workers at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens to assess the validity and reliability of Gershon's measure of safety climate. Findings revealed no relationship between safety climate and employees' gender, age, education, tenure in position, profession, hours worked per day, perceived risk, attitude toward risk, and training. An association was demonstrated between safety climate and (1) healthcare worker compliance with UP and (2) the availability of personal protective equipment, providing support for the construct validity of this measure of safety climate. These findings could be used by occupational health professionals to assess employees' perceptions of the safety culture and practices in the workplace and to guide the institution's risk management efforts in association with U.P.",
author = "E. Anderson and McGovern, {P. M.} and L. Kochevar and D. Vesley and Robyn Gershon",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1945-1474.2000.tb00111.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "19--24",
journal = "Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality",
issn = "1062-2551",
publisher = "National Association for Healthcare Quality",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate.

AU - Anderson, E.

AU - McGovern, P. M.

AU - Kochevar, L.

AU - Vesley, D.

AU - Gershon, Robyn

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The lack of compliance with universal precautions (UP) is well documented across a wide variety of healthcare professions and has been reported both before and after the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Gershon, Karkashian, and Felknor (1994) found that several factors correlated significantly with healthcare workers' lack of compliance with UP, including a measure of organizational safety climate (e.g., the employees' perception of their organizational culture and practices regarding safety). We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 1,746 healthcare workers at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens to assess the validity and reliability of Gershon's measure of safety climate. Findings revealed no relationship between safety climate and employees' gender, age, education, tenure in position, profession, hours worked per day, perceived risk, attitude toward risk, and training. An association was demonstrated between safety climate and (1) healthcare worker compliance with UP and (2) the availability of personal protective equipment, providing support for the construct validity of this measure of safety climate. These findings could be used by occupational health professionals to assess employees' perceptions of the safety culture and practices in the workplace and to guide the institution's risk management efforts in association with U.P.

AB - The lack of compliance with universal precautions (UP) is well documented across a wide variety of healthcare professions and has been reported both before and after the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Gershon, Karkashian, and Felknor (1994) found that several factors correlated significantly with healthcare workers' lack of compliance with UP, including a measure of organizational safety climate (e.g., the employees' perception of their organizational culture and practices regarding safety). We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 1,746 healthcare workers at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens to assess the validity and reliability of Gershon's measure of safety climate. Findings revealed no relationship between safety climate and employees' gender, age, education, tenure in position, profession, hours worked per day, perceived risk, attitude toward risk, and training. An association was demonstrated between safety climate and (1) healthcare worker compliance with UP and (2) the availability of personal protective equipment, providing support for the construct validity of this measure of safety climate. These findings could be used by occupational health professionals to assess employees' perceptions of the safety culture and practices in the workplace and to guide the institution's risk management efforts in association with U.P.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034150955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034150955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2000.tb00111.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2000.tb00111.x

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 19

EP - 24

JO - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

JF - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

SN - 1062-2551

IS - 2

ER -