Testing the internal and external validity of a simplified dental caries index on an adult population

Ralph Katz, L. H. Meskin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This analysis of a caries index, proposed in 1966 to WHO as a simplified method of measurement, as tested on a 16- to 45-year-old population who were seeking dental care at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry revealed several weaknesses associated with the index. An analysis of the external validity of this index, a comparison with subjects' DMFS scores, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Although the index purports to measure the prevalence and severity of dental caries by dividing the dentition into five zones representing increasing severity of dental caries experience, an analysis of this index's internal validity, i.e., whether these five zones truly represent a rank-order scale of severity, revealed misclassification rates of from 21% for the total population up to 44% for a subgroup. When zones were recombined to reduce the misclassification rates, the descriptive capabilities of the index were greatly reduced as most subjects were then classified in only one or two of the zones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-231
Number of pages5
JournalCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Volume4
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

Dental Caries
School Dentistry
Dentition
Dental Care
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Testing the internal and external validity of a simplified dental caries index on an adult population. / Katz, Ralph; Meskin, L. H.

In: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1976, p. 227-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aca9af25e2b74f48a719c5160becd22c,
title = "Testing the internal and external validity of a simplified dental caries index on an adult population",
abstract = "This analysis of a caries index, proposed in 1966 to WHO as a simplified method of measurement, as tested on a 16- to 45-year-old population who were seeking dental care at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry revealed several weaknesses associated with the index. An analysis of the external validity of this index, a comparison with subjects' DMFS scores, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Although the index purports to measure the prevalence and severity of dental caries by dividing the dentition into five zones representing increasing severity of dental caries experience, an analysis of this index's internal validity, i.e., whether these five zones truly represent a rank-order scale of severity, revealed misclassification rates of from 21{\%} for the total population up to 44{\%} for a subgroup. When zones were recombined to reduce the misclassification rates, the descriptive capabilities of the index were greatly reduced as most subjects were then classified in only one or two of the zones.",
author = "Ralph Katz and Meskin, {L. H.}",
year = "1976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "227--231",
journal = "Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology",
issn = "0301-5661",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the internal and external validity of a simplified dental caries index on an adult population

AU - Katz, Ralph

AU - Meskin, L. H.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - This analysis of a caries index, proposed in 1966 to WHO as a simplified method of measurement, as tested on a 16- to 45-year-old population who were seeking dental care at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry revealed several weaknesses associated with the index. An analysis of the external validity of this index, a comparison with subjects' DMFS scores, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Although the index purports to measure the prevalence and severity of dental caries by dividing the dentition into five zones representing increasing severity of dental caries experience, an analysis of this index's internal validity, i.e., whether these five zones truly represent a rank-order scale of severity, revealed misclassification rates of from 21% for the total population up to 44% for a subgroup. When zones were recombined to reduce the misclassification rates, the descriptive capabilities of the index were greatly reduced as most subjects were then classified in only one or two of the zones.

AB - This analysis of a caries index, proposed in 1966 to WHO as a simplified method of measurement, as tested on a 16- to 45-year-old population who were seeking dental care at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry revealed several weaknesses associated with the index. An analysis of the external validity of this index, a comparison with subjects' DMFS scores, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Although the index purports to measure the prevalence and severity of dental caries by dividing the dentition into five zones representing increasing severity of dental caries experience, an analysis of this index's internal validity, i.e., whether these five zones truly represent a rank-order scale of severity, revealed misclassification rates of from 21% for the total population up to 44% for a subgroup. When zones were recombined to reduce the misclassification rates, the descriptive capabilities of the index were greatly reduced as most subjects were then classified in only one or two of the zones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017058937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017058937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1069612

AN - SCOPUS:0017058937

VL - 4

SP - 227

EP - 231

JO - Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

JF - Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

SN - 0301-5661

IS - 6

ER -