Testing self-enhancement and self-assessment theories of achievement motivation

A reply to Sohn's critique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recently, Sohn (1984) published a critique of our research program on self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior (Trope, 1983; Trope & Brickman, 1975). The critique is mainly concerned with the information subjects receive about the diagnostic value of tasks regarding their ability. Sohn argues that diagnosticity information is extraneous to achievement motivation and that its presence creates an artificial situation that is irrelevant to extant achievement theories. Furthermore, he argues that our research program failed to separate informational value from affective value and that the two cannot be separated. Contrary to Sohn's criticism regarding task diagnosticity, our studies show that (1) the antecedents and consequences of perceived diagnosticity are the very same variables that serve to define the achievement domain in extant achievement theories, and (2) our experimental situations fulfill the assumption of extant achievement theories regarding the arousal of achievement motivation. Sohn's criticism regarding the inseparability of affective value and informational value is most clearly contradicted by research showing that the diagnostic value of failure increases informational value but decreases affective value. It is argued that Sohn's objection to the unconfounding of informational and affective value runs counter to the experimental method of theory testing. Finally, it is shown that Sohn's other, more specific criticisms either ignore or distort past research on self-enhancement and self-assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-261
Number of pages15
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1986

Fingerprint

Research
Motivation
Aptitude
Self-Assessment
Arousal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Testing self-enhancement and self-assessment theories of achievement motivation : A reply to Sohn's critique. / Trope, Yaacov.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.1986, p. 247-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c508bcbfdbb74c2984970354fa1a247a,
title = "Testing self-enhancement and self-assessment theories of achievement motivation: A reply to Sohn's critique",
abstract = "Recently, Sohn (1984) published a critique of our research program on self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior (Trope, 1983; Trope & Brickman, 1975). The critique is mainly concerned with the information subjects receive about the diagnostic value of tasks regarding their ability. Sohn argues that diagnosticity information is extraneous to achievement motivation and that its presence creates an artificial situation that is irrelevant to extant achievement theories. Furthermore, he argues that our research program failed to separate informational value from affective value and that the two cannot be separated. Contrary to Sohn's criticism regarding task diagnosticity, our studies show that (1) the antecedents and consequences of perceived diagnosticity are the very same variables that serve to define the achievement domain in extant achievement theories, and (2) our experimental situations fulfill the assumption of extant achievement theories regarding the arousal of achievement motivation. Sohn's criticism regarding the inseparability of affective value and informational value is most clearly contradicted by research showing that the diagnostic value of failure increases informational value but decreases affective value. It is argued that Sohn's objection to the unconfounding of informational and affective value runs counter to the experimental method of theory testing. Finally, it is shown that Sohn's other, more specific criticisms either ignore or distort past research on self-enhancement and self-assessment.",
author = "Yaacov Trope",
year = "1986",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/BF00992319",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "247--261",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing self-enhancement and self-assessment theories of achievement motivation

T2 - A reply to Sohn's critique

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 1986/9

Y1 - 1986/9

N2 - Recently, Sohn (1984) published a critique of our research program on self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior (Trope, 1983; Trope & Brickman, 1975). The critique is mainly concerned with the information subjects receive about the diagnostic value of tasks regarding their ability. Sohn argues that diagnosticity information is extraneous to achievement motivation and that its presence creates an artificial situation that is irrelevant to extant achievement theories. Furthermore, he argues that our research program failed to separate informational value from affective value and that the two cannot be separated. Contrary to Sohn's criticism regarding task diagnosticity, our studies show that (1) the antecedents and consequences of perceived diagnosticity are the very same variables that serve to define the achievement domain in extant achievement theories, and (2) our experimental situations fulfill the assumption of extant achievement theories regarding the arousal of achievement motivation. Sohn's criticism regarding the inseparability of affective value and informational value is most clearly contradicted by research showing that the diagnostic value of failure increases informational value but decreases affective value. It is argued that Sohn's objection to the unconfounding of informational and affective value runs counter to the experimental method of theory testing. Finally, it is shown that Sohn's other, more specific criticisms either ignore or distort past research on self-enhancement and self-assessment.

AB - Recently, Sohn (1984) published a critique of our research program on self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior (Trope, 1983; Trope & Brickman, 1975). The critique is mainly concerned with the information subjects receive about the diagnostic value of tasks regarding their ability. Sohn argues that diagnosticity information is extraneous to achievement motivation and that its presence creates an artificial situation that is irrelevant to extant achievement theories. Furthermore, he argues that our research program failed to separate informational value from affective value and that the two cannot be separated. Contrary to Sohn's criticism regarding task diagnosticity, our studies show that (1) the antecedents and consequences of perceived diagnosticity are the very same variables that serve to define the achievement domain in extant achievement theories, and (2) our experimental situations fulfill the assumption of extant achievement theories regarding the arousal of achievement motivation. Sohn's criticism regarding the inseparability of affective value and informational value is most clearly contradicted by research showing that the diagnostic value of failure increases informational value but decreases affective value. It is argued that Sohn's objection to the unconfounding of informational and affective value runs counter to the experimental method of theory testing. Finally, it is shown that Sohn's other, more specific criticisms either ignore or distort past research on self-enhancement and self-assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250127484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250127484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00992319

DO - 10.1007/BF00992319

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 247

EP - 261

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 3

ER -