Testing for dependence between failure time and visit compliance with interval-censored data

Rebecca Betensky, D. M. Finkelstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interval-censored failure-time data arise when subjects miss prescheduled visits at which the failure is to be assessed. The resulting intervals in which the failure is known to have occurred are overlapping. Most approaches to the analysis of these data assume that the visit-compliance process is ignorable with respect to likelihood analysis of the failure-time distribution. While this assumption offers considerable simplification, it is not always plausible. Here we test for dependence between the failure- and visit-compliance processes, applicable to studies in which data collection continues after the occurrence of the failure. We do not make any of the assumptions made by previous authors about the joint distribution of the visit-compliance process, a covariate process, and the failure time. Instead, we consider conditional models of the true failure history given the current visit compliance at each visit time, allowing for correlation across visit times. Because failure status is not known at some visit times due to missed visits, only models of the observed failure history given current visit compliance are estimable. We describe how the parameters from these models can be used to test for a negative association and how bounds on unestimable parameters provided by the observed data are needed additionally to infer a positive association. We illustrate the method with data from an AIDS study and we investigate the power of the test through a simulation study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-63
Number of pages6
JournalBiometrics
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Interval-censored Data
Failure Time
Compliance
compliance
Testing
testing
History
history
probability analysis
Negative Association
Failure Time Data
Conditional Model
data analysis
Joint Distribution
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Simplification
Overlapping
Covariates
Likelihood
Continue

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • Dependent censoring
  • Missing data
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Testing for dependence between failure time and visit compliance with interval-censored data. / Betensky, Rebecca; Finkelstein, D. M.

In: Biometrics, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 58-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Betensky, Rebecca ; Finkelstein, D. M. / Testing for dependence between failure time and visit compliance with interval-censored data. In: Biometrics. 2002 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 58-63.
@article{421f87d396bc42de85feb28e113a85e9,
title = "Testing for dependence between failure time and visit compliance with interval-censored data",
abstract = "Interval-censored failure-time data arise when subjects miss prescheduled visits at which the failure is to be assessed. The resulting intervals in which the failure is known to have occurred are overlapping. Most approaches to the analysis of these data assume that the visit-compliance process is ignorable with respect to likelihood analysis of the failure-time distribution. While this assumption offers considerable simplification, it is not always plausible. Here we test for dependence between the failure- and visit-compliance processes, applicable to studies in which data collection continues after the occurrence of the failure. We do not make any of the assumptions made by previous authors about the joint distribution of the visit-compliance process, a covariate process, and the failure time. Instead, we consider conditional models of the true failure history given the current visit compliance at each visit time, allowing for correlation across visit times. Because failure status is not known at some visit times due to missed visits, only models of the observed failure history given current visit compliance are estimable. We describe how the parameters from these models can be used to test for a negative association and how bounds on unestimable parameters provided by the observed data are needed additionally to infer a positive association. We illustrate the method with data from an AIDS study and we investigate the power of the test through a simulation study.",
keywords = "AIDS, Dependent censoring, Missing data, Screening",
author = "Rebecca Betensky and Finkelstein, {D. M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00058.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "58--63",
journal = "Biometrics",
issn = "0006-341X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for dependence between failure time and visit compliance with interval-censored data

AU - Betensky, Rebecca

AU - Finkelstein, D. M.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Interval-censored failure-time data arise when subjects miss prescheduled visits at which the failure is to be assessed. The resulting intervals in which the failure is known to have occurred are overlapping. Most approaches to the analysis of these data assume that the visit-compliance process is ignorable with respect to likelihood analysis of the failure-time distribution. While this assumption offers considerable simplification, it is not always plausible. Here we test for dependence between the failure- and visit-compliance processes, applicable to studies in which data collection continues after the occurrence of the failure. We do not make any of the assumptions made by previous authors about the joint distribution of the visit-compliance process, a covariate process, and the failure time. Instead, we consider conditional models of the true failure history given the current visit compliance at each visit time, allowing for correlation across visit times. Because failure status is not known at some visit times due to missed visits, only models of the observed failure history given current visit compliance are estimable. We describe how the parameters from these models can be used to test for a negative association and how bounds on unestimable parameters provided by the observed data are needed additionally to infer a positive association. We illustrate the method with data from an AIDS study and we investigate the power of the test through a simulation study.

AB - Interval-censored failure-time data arise when subjects miss prescheduled visits at which the failure is to be assessed. The resulting intervals in which the failure is known to have occurred are overlapping. Most approaches to the analysis of these data assume that the visit-compliance process is ignorable with respect to likelihood analysis of the failure-time distribution. While this assumption offers considerable simplification, it is not always plausible. Here we test for dependence between the failure- and visit-compliance processes, applicable to studies in which data collection continues after the occurrence of the failure. We do not make any of the assumptions made by previous authors about the joint distribution of the visit-compliance process, a covariate process, and the failure time. Instead, we consider conditional models of the true failure history given the current visit compliance at each visit time, allowing for correlation across visit times. Because failure status is not known at some visit times due to missed visits, only models of the observed failure history given current visit compliance are estimable. We describe how the parameters from these models can be used to test for a negative association and how bounds on unestimable parameters provided by the observed data are needed additionally to infer a positive association. We illustrate the method with data from an AIDS study and we investigate the power of the test through a simulation study.

KW - AIDS

KW - Dependent censoring

KW - Missing data

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036190969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036190969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00058.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00058.x

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 58

EP - 63

JO - Biometrics

JF - Biometrics

SN - 0006-341X

IS - 1

ER -