Test scores, education, and poverty

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) argued that individual differences in intelligence are the main source of inequality in the United States. They base their claim on an analysis of how poverty (and other outcomes) related to test scores in a large national database known as the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY Y). Their interpretation of the test of cognitive abilities that is part of the NLSY rests on the assumption that test scores reflect abilities that are innate, not taught. Evidence presented here contradicts that assumption. They dismissed class origins as a factor in poverty; improved measures of class background contradict that conclusion. They ignored the role of gender and family in poverty and the role of institutions in determining whether individual characteristics matter or not. Patterns in the NLSY show how gender, family circumstances, and other institutional factors are important influences that account for more of the variation in poverty than test scores do. Altogether the results imply a stronger effect of social environment for U.S. poverty than Herrnstein and Murray’s analysis implies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRace and Intelligence
Subtitle of host publicationSeparating Science From Myth
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages329-354
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)1410604330, 9781135651794
ISBN (Print)0805837574, 9781138866652
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

poverty
education
institutional factors
gender
cognitive ability
intelligence
interpretation
ability
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Hout, M. (2013). Test scores, education, and poverty. In Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth (pp. 329-354). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604330-23

Test scores, education, and poverty. / Hout, Michael.

Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth. Taylor and Francis, 2013. p. 329-354.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hout, M 2013, Test scores, education, and poverty. in Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth. Taylor and Francis, pp. 329-354. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604330-23
Hout M. Test scores, education, and poverty. In Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth. Taylor and Francis. 2013. p. 329-354 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604330-23
Hout, Michael. / Test scores, education, and poverty. Race and Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth. Taylor and Francis, 2013. pp. 329-354
@inbook{81e83083a38e4ba6bcdbf8c5f5d0af1b,
title = "Test scores, education, and poverty",
abstract = "In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) argued that individual differences in intelligence are the main source of inequality in the United States. They base their claim on an analysis of how poverty (and other outcomes) related to test scores in a large national database known as the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY Y). Their interpretation of the test of cognitive abilities that is part of the NLSY rests on the assumption that test scores reflect abilities that are innate, not taught. Evidence presented here contradicts that assumption. They dismissed class origins as a factor in poverty; improved measures of class background contradict that conclusion. They ignored the role of gender and family in poverty and the role of institutions in determining whether individual characteristics matter or not. Patterns in the NLSY show how gender, family circumstances, and other institutional factors are important influences that account for more of the variation in poverty than test scores do. Altogether the results imply a stronger effect of social environment for U.S. poverty than Herrnstein and Murray’s analysis implies.",
author = "Michael Hout",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781410604330-23",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0805837574",
pages = "329--354",
booktitle = "Race and Intelligence",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Test scores, education, and poverty

AU - Hout, Michael

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) argued that individual differences in intelligence are the main source of inequality in the United States. They base their claim on an analysis of how poverty (and other outcomes) related to test scores in a large national database known as the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY Y). Their interpretation of the test of cognitive abilities that is part of the NLSY rests on the assumption that test scores reflect abilities that are innate, not taught. Evidence presented here contradicts that assumption. They dismissed class origins as a factor in poverty; improved measures of class background contradict that conclusion. They ignored the role of gender and family in poverty and the role of institutions in determining whether individual characteristics matter or not. Patterns in the NLSY show how gender, family circumstances, and other institutional factors are important influences that account for more of the variation in poverty than test scores do. Altogether the results imply a stronger effect of social environment for U.S. poverty than Herrnstein and Murray’s analysis implies.

AB - In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) argued that individual differences in intelligence are the main source of inequality in the United States. They base their claim on an analysis of how poverty (and other outcomes) related to test scores in a large national database known as the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY Y). Their interpretation of the test of cognitive abilities that is part of the NLSY rests on the assumption that test scores reflect abilities that are innate, not taught. Evidence presented here contradicts that assumption. They dismissed class origins as a factor in poverty; improved measures of class background contradict that conclusion. They ignored the role of gender and family in poverty and the role of institutions in determining whether individual characteristics matter or not. Patterns in the NLSY show how gender, family circumstances, and other institutional factors are important influences that account for more of the variation in poverty than test scores do. Altogether the results imply a stronger effect of social environment for U.S. poverty than Herrnstein and Murray’s analysis implies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18344389526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18344389526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781410604330-23

DO - 10.4324/9781410604330-23

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0805837574

SN - 9781138866652

SP - 329

EP - 354

BT - Race and Intelligence

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -