Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory

Jordan W. Suchow, Daryl Fougnie, Timothy F. Brady, George A. Alvarez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)2071-2079
    Number of pages9
    JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
    Volume76
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

    Fingerprint

    Short-Term Memory
    Aptitude
    commodity
    Visual Memory
    Psychology
    Pole
    resources
    flexibility
    psychology
    supply
    Visual Working Memory
    Commodities
    Visual Representation
    Fidelity
    Resources
    ability
    Working Memory
    Quantization

    Keywords

    • Memory: Visual working and short-term memory
    • Visual working memory
    • Working memory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Language and Linguistics
    • Sensory Systems
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory. / Suchow, Jordan W.; Fougnie, Daryl; Brady, Timothy F.; Alvarez, George A.

    In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 76, No. 7, 01.01.2014, p. 2071-2079.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Suchow, Jordan W. ; Fougnie, Daryl ; Brady, Timothy F. ; Alvarez, George A. / Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory. In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 7. pp. 2071-2079.
    @article{82528c6086ee4ec5aa47e4e10a342b9c,
    title = "Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory",
    abstract = "Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.",
    keywords = "Memory: Visual working and short-term memory, Visual working memory, Working memory",
    author = "Suchow, {Jordan W.} and Daryl Fougnie and Brady, {Timothy F.} and Alvarez, {George A.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "76",
    pages = "2071--2079",
    journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
    issn = "1943-3921",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory

    AU - Suchow, Jordan W.

    AU - Fougnie, Daryl

    AU - Brady, Timothy F.

    AU - Alvarez, George A.

    PY - 2014/1/1

    Y1 - 2014/1/1

    N2 - Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

    AB - Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

    KW - Memory: Visual working and short-term memory

    KW - Visual working memory

    KW - Working memory

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928492553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928492553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7

    DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7

    M3 - Article

    VL - 76

    SP - 2071

    EP - 2079

    JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

    JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

    SN - 1943-3921

    IS - 7

    ER -