Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory

Jordan W. Suchow, Daryl Fougnie, Timothy F. Brady, George A. Alvarez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2071-2079
Number of pages9
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume76
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
commodity
Visual Memory
Psychology
Pole
resources
flexibility
psychology
supply
Visual Working Memory
Commodities
Visual Representation
Fidelity
Resources
ability
Working Memory
Quantization

Keywords

  • Memory: Visual working and short-term memory
  • Visual working memory
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Sensory Systems
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory. / Suchow, Jordan W.; Fougnie, Daryl; Brady, Timothy F.; Alvarez, George A.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 76, No. 7, 01.01.2014, p. 2071-2079.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suchow, Jordan W. ; Fougnie, Daryl ; Brady, Timothy F. ; Alvarez, George A. / Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory. In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 7. pp. 2071-2079.
@article{82528c6086ee4ec5aa47e4e10a342b9c,
title = "Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory",
abstract = "Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.",
keywords = "Memory: Visual working and short-term memory, Visual working memory, Working memory",
author = "Suchow, {Jordan W.} and Daryl Fougnie and Brady, {Timothy F.} and Alvarez, {George A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "2071--2079",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Terms of the debate on the format and structure of visual memory

AU - Suchow, Jordan W.

AU - Fougnie, Daryl

AU - Brady, Timothy F.

AU - Alvarez, George A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

AB - Our ability to actively maintain information in visual memory is strikingly limited. There is considerable debate about why this is so. As with many questions in psychology, the debate is framed dichotomously: Is visual working memory limited because it is supported by only a small handful of discrete “slots” into which visual representations are placed, or is it because there is an insufficient supply of a “resource” that is flexibly shared among visual representations? Here, we argue that this dichotomous framing obscures a set of at least eight underlying questions. Separately considering each question reveals a rich hypothesis space that will be useful for building a comprehensive model of visual working memory. The questions regard (1) an upper limit on the number of represented items, (2) the quantization of the memory commodity, (3) the relationship between how many items are stored and how well they are stored, (4) whether the number of stored items completely determines the fidelity of a representation (vs. fidelity being stochastic or variable), (5) the flexibility with which the memory commodity can be assigned or reassigned to items, (6) the format of the memory representation, (7) how working memories are formed, and (8) how memory representations are used to make responses in behavioral tasks. We reframe the debate in terms of these eight underlying questions, placing slot and resource models as poles in a more expansive theoretical space.

KW - Memory: Visual working and short-term memory

KW - Visual working memory

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928492553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928492553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7

DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0690-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 24894917

AN - SCOPUS:84928492553

VL - 76

SP - 2071

EP - 2079

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 7

ER -