Tendon-associated bone features of the masticatory system in Neandertals

Susan Anton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Masticatory or paramasticatory activities are often considered to have produced elevated stresses important in the evolution of the Neandertal face. Yet Neandertals were geometrically ill-equipped to produce absolutely great anterior bite forces due to their relatively long bite-force lever arms. To consider whether Neandertals might have had structurally different masticatory muscles capable of producing more force than modern human muscles, this study examines the form and frequency of bone features known to be associated with internal tendons (structure) of the masticatory musculature in four species of macaques (n=85), three geographically distinct samples of modern humans (n=111), and Neandertals (n=27). Neandertals present a mosaic of tendon-associated bone features compared with macaques and humans. The Neandertal deep masseter and anterior temporalis are inferred to be better defined and perhaps larger than in modern humans based on their better developed deep masseter fossae and presence of a postorbital ridge. Medial pterygoid bone features were not qualitatively different from those in some modern humans although the medial pterygoid tubercle is larger, on average, in Neandertals. These results imply the presence of moderately stronger masticatory muscles in Neandertals than in modern humans. A moderate increase in masticatory muscle strength is considered necessary in Neandertals to offset their relatively prognathic face. However, the differences are small enough that it remains unlikely that Neandertals could produce absolutely great anterior bite forces.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)391-408
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Human Evolution
    Volume31
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    tendons
    bone
    muscle
    bones
    Macaca
    muscles
    muscle strength
    Neandertals
    Modern Humans
    sampling

    Keywords

    • Comparative anatomy
    • Macaca
    • Medial pterygoid tubercle
    • Muscle architecture

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Education
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Tendon-associated bone features of the masticatory system in Neandertals. / Anton, Susan.

    In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1996, p. 391-408.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d11680cb367e4ad69793043445cb1397,
    title = "Tendon-associated bone features of the masticatory system in Neandertals",
    abstract = "Masticatory or paramasticatory activities are often considered to have produced elevated stresses important in the evolution of the Neandertal face. Yet Neandertals were geometrically ill-equipped to produce absolutely great anterior bite forces due to their relatively long bite-force lever arms. To consider whether Neandertals might have had structurally different masticatory muscles capable of producing more force than modern human muscles, this study examines the form and frequency of bone features known to be associated with internal tendons (structure) of the masticatory musculature in four species of macaques (n=85), three geographically distinct samples of modern humans (n=111), and Neandertals (n=27). Neandertals present a mosaic of tendon-associated bone features compared with macaques and humans. The Neandertal deep masseter and anterior temporalis are inferred to be better defined and perhaps larger than in modern humans based on their better developed deep masseter fossae and presence of a postorbital ridge. Medial pterygoid bone features were not qualitatively different from those in some modern humans although the medial pterygoid tubercle is larger, on average, in Neandertals. These results imply the presence of moderately stronger masticatory muscles in Neandertals than in modern humans. A moderate increase in masticatory muscle strength is considered necessary in Neandertals to offset their relatively prognathic face. However, the differences are small enough that it remains unlikely that Neandertals could produce absolutely great anterior bite forces.",
    keywords = "Comparative anatomy, Macaca, Medial pterygoid tubercle, Muscle architecture",
    author = "Susan Anton",
    year = "1996",
    doi = "10.1006/jhev.1996.0068",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "391--408",
    journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
    issn = "0047-2484",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tendon-associated bone features of the masticatory system in Neandertals

    AU - Anton, Susan

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - Masticatory or paramasticatory activities are often considered to have produced elevated stresses important in the evolution of the Neandertal face. Yet Neandertals were geometrically ill-equipped to produce absolutely great anterior bite forces due to their relatively long bite-force lever arms. To consider whether Neandertals might have had structurally different masticatory muscles capable of producing more force than modern human muscles, this study examines the form and frequency of bone features known to be associated with internal tendons (structure) of the masticatory musculature in four species of macaques (n=85), three geographically distinct samples of modern humans (n=111), and Neandertals (n=27). Neandertals present a mosaic of tendon-associated bone features compared with macaques and humans. The Neandertal deep masseter and anterior temporalis are inferred to be better defined and perhaps larger than in modern humans based on their better developed deep masseter fossae and presence of a postorbital ridge. Medial pterygoid bone features were not qualitatively different from those in some modern humans although the medial pterygoid tubercle is larger, on average, in Neandertals. These results imply the presence of moderately stronger masticatory muscles in Neandertals than in modern humans. A moderate increase in masticatory muscle strength is considered necessary in Neandertals to offset their relatively prognathic face. However, the differences are small enough that it remains unlikely that Neandertals could produce absolutely great anterior bite forces.

    AB - Masticatory or paramasticatory activities are often considered to have produced elevated stresses important in the evolution of the Neandertal face. Yet Neandertals were geometrically ill-equipped to produce absolutely great anterior bite forces due to their relatively long bite-force lever arms. To consider whether Neandertals might have had structurally different masticatory muscles capable of producing more force than modern human muscles, this study examines the form and frequency of bone features known to be associated with internal tendons (structure) of the masticatory musculature in four species of macaques (n=85), three geographically distinct samples of modern humans (n=111), and Neandertals (n=27). Neandertals present a mosaic of tendon-associated bone features compared with macaques and humans. The Neandertal deep masseter and anterior temporalis are inferred to be better defined and perhaps larger than in modern humans based on their better developed deep masseter fossae and presence of a postorbital ridge. Medial pterygoid bone features were not qualitatively different from those in some modern humans although the medial pterygoid tubercle is larger, on average, in Neandertals. These results imply the presence of moderately stronger masticatory muscles in Neandertals than in modern humans. A moderate increase in masticatory muscle strength is considered necessary in Neandertals to offset their relatively prognathic face. However, the differences are small enough that it remains unlikely that Neandertals could produce absolutely great anterior bite forces.

    KW - Comparative anatomy

    KW - Macaca

    KW - Medial pterygoid tubercle

    KW - Muscle architecture

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030429596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030429596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1006/jhev.1996.0068

    DO - 10.1006/jhev.1996.0068

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0030429596

    VL - 31

    SP - 391

    EP - 408

    JO - Journal of Human Evolution

    JF - Journal of Human Evolution

    SN - 0047-2484

    IS - 5

    ER -