Ten men and women got married today

Noun coordination and the intersective theory of conjunction

Lucas Champollion

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The word and can be used both intersectively, as in John lies and cheats, and collectively, as in John and Mary met. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns (liar and cheat), this article argues that the basic meaning of and is intersective. This theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth 1983; Winter 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination (men and women) challenge this view, and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli 2005). The main result of this article is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of and in men and women. And leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving indefinites, collective predicates and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter 2001). This article also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)561-622
    Number of pages62
    JournalJournal of Semantics
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Set theory
    Mathematical operators
    wife
    collective behavior
    Nouns
    Noun Phrase

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Artificial Intelligence

    Cite this

    Ten men and women got married today : Noun coordination and the intersective theory of conjunction. / Champollion, Lucas.

    In: Journal of Semantics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.08.2016, p. 561-622.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{86bdc20a993049369cfc79b18441dc83,
    title = "Ten men and women got married today: Noun coordination and the intersective theory of conjunction",
    abstract = "The word and can be used both intersectively, as in John lies and cheats, and collectively, as in John and Mary met. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns (liar and cheat), this article argues that the basic meaning of and is intersective. This theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth 1983; Winter 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination (men and women) challenge this view, and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli 2005). The main result of this article is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of and in men and women. And leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving indefinites, collective predicates and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter 2001). This article also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.",
    author = "Lucas Champollion",
    year = "2016",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/jos/ffv008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "561--622",
    journal = "Journal of Semantics",
    issn = "0167-5133",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ten men and women got married today

    T2 - Noun coordination and the intersective theory of conjunction

    AU - Champollion, Lucas

    PY - 2016/8/1

    Y1 - 2016/8/1

    N2 - The word and can be used both intersectively, as in John lies and cheats, and collectively, as in John and Mary met. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns (liar and cheat), this article argues that the basic meaning of and is intersective. This theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth 1983; Winter 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination (men and women) challenge this view, and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli 2005). The main result of this article is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of and in men and women. And leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving indefinites, collective predicates and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter 2001). This article also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.

    AB - The word and can be used both intersectively, as in John lies and cheats, and collectively, as in John and Mary met. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns (liar and cheat), this article argues that the basic meaning of and is intersective. This theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth 1983; Winter 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination (men and women) challenge this view, and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli 2005). The main result of this article is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of and in men and women. And leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving indefinites, collective predicates and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter 2001). This article also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011015546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011015546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/jos/ffv008

    DO - 10.1093/jos/ffv008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 561

    EP - 622

    JO - Journal of Semantics

    JF - Journal of Semantics

    SN - 0167-5133

    IS - 3

    ER -