Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks

Jonathan Winawer, Josh Wallman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

If the effective focal length of a growing eye is modified by spectacle lenses, the eye compensates by altering its growth, thereby keeping images in focus, a process we presume is similar to normal emmetropization. Using chicks, we have investigated how much visual exposure the eye needs to exhibit the two principal components of ocular compensation: altered rate of elongation (a scleral mechanism) and altered choroidal thickness. We have found that surprisingly small amounts of vision through spectacle lenses can elicit robust scleral and choroidal compensation if other visual feedback is limited by keeping the animals in the dark when not wearing lenses. Furthermore, we have found that the amount of vision necessary to induce these responses can be summarized as three rules: First, several brief daily episodes are more effective than a single or a few longer daily episodes, even if the total amount of vision is the same. Second, extremely brief episodes, even if very frequent, are relatively ineffective. Third, when plus and minus lenses are worn successively on the same eye, the plus lens has the dominant effect, even if the minus lens is worn five times longer than the plus lens. In addition, we have shown that the elongation rate and choroidal thickness responses are dissociable, such that brief, infrequent lens-viewing produces only an elongation response in the case of plus lens-wear and only a choroid response in the case of minus lens-wear. We thus show that the emmetropization system does not integrate defocus in a simple, linear fashion. These non-linearities, if present in children, might explain why, although education and reading show an epidemiological correlation with myopia, the total time spent reading and doing other nearwork by individual children generally does not predict the degree of myopia. It may therefore be necessary to quantify more complex temporal patterns of nearwork over the day in order to measure the impact of nearwork on eye growth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2651-2668
Number of pages18
JournalVision Research
Volume42
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Lenses
Crystalline Lens
Myopia
Reading
Sensory Feedback
Choroid
Growth
Education

Keywords

  • Choroid
  • Emmetropization
  • Hyperopia
  • Myopia
  • Refractive error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. / Winawer, Jonathan; Wallman, Josh.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 42, No. 24, 11.2002, p. 2651-2668.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winawer, Jonathan ; Wallman, Josh. / Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. In: Vision Research. 2002 ; Vol. 42, No. 24. pp. 2651-2668.
@article{fbfc0ee06ebc4aeeaa7c328b2cc0ae8b,
title = "Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks",
abstract = "If the effective focal length of a growing eye is modified by spectacle lenses, the eye compensates by altering its growth, thereby keeping images in focus, a process we presume is similar to normal emmetropization. Using chicks, we have investigated how much visual exposure the eye needs to exhibit the two principal components of ocular compensation: altered rate of elongation (a scleral mechanism) and altered choroidal thickness. We have found that surprisingly small amounts of vision through spectacle lenses can elicit robust scleral and choroidal compensation if other visual feedback is limited by keeping the animals in the dark when not wearing lenses. Furthermore, we have found that the amount of vision necessary to induce these responses can be summarized as three rules: First, several brief daily episodes are more effective than a single or a few longer daily episodes, even if the total amount of vision is the same. Second, extremely brief episodes, even if very frequent, are relatively ineffective. Third, when plus and minus lenses are worn successively on the same eye, the plus lens has the dominant effect, even if the minus lens is worn five times longer than the plus lens. In addition, we have shown that the elongation rate and choroidal thickness responses are dissociable, such that brief, infrequent lens-viewing produces only an elongation response in the case of plus lens-wear and only a choroid response in the case of minus lens-wear. We thus show that the emmetropization system does not integrate defocus in a simple, linear fashion. These non-linearities, if present in children, might explain why, although education and reading show an epidemiological correlation with myopia, the total time spent reading and doing other nearwork by individual children generally does not predict the degree of myopia. It may therefore be necessary to quantify more complex temporal patterns of nearwork over the day in order to measure the impact of nearwork on eye growth.",
keywords = "Choroid, Emmetropization, Hyperopia, Myopia, Refractive error",
author = "Jonathan Winawer and Josh Wallman",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00300-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "2651--2668",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks

AU - Winawer, Jonathan

AU - Wallman, Josh

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - If the effective focal length of a growing eye is modified by spectacle lenses, the eye compensates by altering its growth, thereby keeping images in focus, a process we presume is similar to normal emmetropization. Using chicks, we have investigated how much visual exposure the eye needs to exhibit the two principal components of ocular compensation: altered rate of elongation (a scleral mechanism) and altered choroidal thickness. We have found that surprisingly small amounts of vision through spectacle lenses can elicit robust scleral and choroidal compensation if other visual feedback is limited by keeping the animals in the dark when not wearing lenses. Furthermore, we have found that the amount of vision necessary to induce these responses can be summarized as three rules: First, several brief daily episodes are more effective than a single or a few longer daily episodes, even if the total amount of vision is the same. Second, extremely brief episodes, even if very frequent, are relatively ineffective. Third, when plus and minus lenses are worn successively on the same eye, the plus lens has the dominant effect, even if the minus lens is worn five times longer than the plus lens. In addition, we have shown that the elongation rate and choroidal thickness responses are dissociable, such that brief, infrequent lens-viewing produces only an elongation response in the case of plus lens-wear and only a choroid response in the case of minus lens-wear. We thus show that the emmetropization system does not integrate defocus in a simple, linear fashion. These non-linearities, if present in children, might explain why, although education and reading show an epidemiological correlation with myopia, the total time spent reading and doing other nearwork by individual children generally does not predict the degree of myopia. It may therefore be necessary to quantify more complex temporal patterns of nearwork over the day in order to measure the impact of nearwork on eye growth.

AB - If the effective focal length of a growing eye is modified by spectacle lenses, the eye compensates by altering its growth, thereby keeping images in focus, a process we presume is similar to normal emmetropization. Using chicks, we have investigated how much visual exposure the eye needs to exhibit the two principal components of ocular compensation: altered rate of elongation (a scleral mechanism) and altered choroidal thickness. We have found that surprisingly small amounts of vision through spectacle lenses can elicit robust scleral and choroidal compensation if other visual feedback is limited by keeping the animals in the dark when not wearing lenses. Furthermore, we have found that the amount of vision necessary to induce these responses can be summarized as three rules: First, several brief daily episodes are more effective than a single or a few longer daily episodes, even if the total amount of vision is the same. Second, extremely brief episodes, even if very frequent, are relatively ineffective. Third, when plus and minus lenses are worn successively on the same eye, the plus lens has the dominant effect, even if the minus lens is worn five times longer than the plus lens. In addition, we have shown that the elongation rate and choroidal thickness responses are dissociable, such that brief, infrequent lens-viewing produces only an elongation response in the case of plus lens-wear and only a choroid response in the case of minus lens-wear. We thus show that the emmetropization system does not integrate defocus in a simple, linear fashion. These non-linearities, if present in children, might explain why, although education and reading show an epidemiological correlation with myopia, the total time spent reading and doing other nearwork by individual children generally does not predict the degree of myopia. It may therefore be necessary to quantify more complex temporal patterns of nearwork over the day in order to measure the impact of nearwork on eye growth.

KW - Choroid

KW - Emmetropization

KW - Hyperopia

KW - Myopia

KW - Refractive error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036848399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036848399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00300-0

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00300-0

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 2651

EP - 2668

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 24

ER -