Temp Nations? A Research Agenda on Migration, Temporariness, and Membership

David Cook-Martin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article outlines a research agenda to study how, why, and with what consequences systems of migration policy that rely on time-delimited statuses have been tools of nation-state making. Taking a long view and comparing key contemporary cases, I argue that temporary migration regimes have been appealing because they purport to reconcile the disparate interests and preferences of political actors in sending and receiving countries, native and foreign workers, and employers. Such regimes have been a means for the affirmative selection of migrants as workers—an approach that preserves the option of rejecting them as permanent members. The proposed research would uncover the full range of temporal means by which states have shaped populations through migration policy. Substantively, it explores how changes in the ratio of temporary to permanent statuses affect the meaning of political belonging. This would include an examination of how the policing of temporariness requires routine bureaucratic monitoring as well as extreme measures like deportation with consequences for migrants as well as for the communities in which they live.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    migration policy
    Public Policy
    foreign employer
    migrant
    native country
    migration
    foreign worker
    deportation
    Emigration and Immigration
    political actor
    Research
    nation state
    regime
    monitoring
    examination
    Population
    community
    time

    Keywords

    • migration policy
    • nation-state making
    • temporary migration regime

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Cultural Studies
    • Education
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Temp Nations? A Research Agenda on Migration, Temporariness, and Membership. / Cook-Martin, David.

    In: American Behavioral Scientist, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{f45f822a16b245669ce2d8810807e456,
    title = "Temp Nations? A Research Agenda on Migration, Temporariness, and Membership",
    abstract = "This article outlines a research agenda to study how, why, and with what consequences systems of migration policy that rely on time-delimited statuses have been tools of nation-state making. Taking a long view and comparing key contemporary cases, I argue that temporary migration regimes have been appealing because they purport to reconcile the disparate interests and preferences of political actors in sending and receiving countries, native and foreign workers, and employers. Such regimes have been a means for the affirmative selection of migrants as workers—an approach that preserves the option of rejecting them as permanent members. The proposed research would uncover the full range of temporal means by which states have shaped populations through migration policy. Substantively, it explores how changes in the ratio of temporary to permanent statuses affect the meaning of political belonging. This would include an examination of how the policing of temporariness requires routine bureaucratic monitoring as well as extreme measures like deportation with consequences for migrants as well as for the communities in which they live.",
    keywords = "migration policy, nation-state making, temporary migration regime",
    author = "David Cook-Martin",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0002764219835247",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
    issn = "0002-7642",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Temp Nations? A Research Agenda on Migration, Temporariness, and Membership

    AU - Cook-Martin, David

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - This article outlines a research agenda to study how, why, and with what consequences systems of migration policy that rely on time-delimited statuses have been tools of nation-state making. Taking a long view and comparing key contemporary cases, I argue that temporary migration regimes have been appealing because they purport to reconcile the disparate interests and preferences of political actors in sending and receiving countries, native and foreign workers, and employers. Such regimes have been a means for the affirmative selection of migrants as workers—an approach that preserves the option of rejecting them as permanent members. The proposed research would uncover the full range of temporal means by which states have shaped populations through migration policy. Substantively, it explores how changes in the ratio of temporary to permanent statuses affect the meaning of political belonging. This would include an examination of how the policing of temporariness requires routine bureaucratic monitoring as well as extreme measures like deportation with consequences for migrants as well as for the communities in which they live.

    AB - This article outlines a research agenda to study how, why, and with what consequences systems of migration policy that rely on time-delimited statuses have been tools of nation-state making. Taking a long view and comparing key contemporary cases, I argue that temporary migration regimes have been appealing because they purport to reconcile the disparate interests and preferences of political actors in sending and receiving countries, native and foreign workers, and employers. Such regimes have been a means for the affirmative selection of migrants as workers—an approach that preserves the option of rejecting them as permanent members. The proposed research would uncover the full range of temporal means by which states have shaped populations through migration policy. Substantively, it explores how changes in the ratio of temporary to permanent statuses affect the meaning of political belonging. This would include an examination of how the policing of temporariness requires routine bureaucratic monitoring as well as extreme measures like deportation with consequences for migrants as well as for the communities in which they live.

    KW - migration policy

    KW - nation-state making

    KW - temporary migration regime

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064631602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064631602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0002764219835247

    DO - 10.1177/0002764219835247

    M3 - Article

    JO - American Behavioral Scientist

    JF - American Behavioral Scientist

    SN - 0002-7642

    ER -