Telescopes don't make catalogues!

D. W. Hogg, D. Lang

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Telescopes don't make catalogues, they make intensity measurements; any precise experiment performed with a telescope ought to involve modelling those measurements. People make catalogues, but because a catalogue requires hard decisions about calibration and detection, no catalogue can contain all of the information in the raw pixels relevant to most scientific investigations. Here we advocate making catalogue-like data outputs that permit investigators to test hypotheses with almost the power of the original image pixels. The key is to provide users approximations to likelihood tests against the raw image pixels. We advocate three options, in order of increasing difficulty: The first is to define catalogue entries and associated uncertainties such that the catalogue contains the parameters of an approximate description of the image-level likelihood function. The second is to produce a K-catalogue sampling in "catalogue space" that samples a posterior probability distribution of catalogues given the data. The third is to expose a web service or equivalent that can compute the full image-level likelihood for any user-supplied catalogue.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationGAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry
    Pages351-358
    Number of pages8
    Volume45
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2011
    EventSymposium - GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry - Sevres, France
    Duration: Jun 7 2010Jun 11 2010

    Publication series

    NameEAS Publications Series
    Volume45
    ISSN (Print)16334760
    ISSN (Electronic)16381963

    Other

    OtherSymposium - GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry
    CountryFrance
    CitySevres
    Period6/7/106/11/10

    Fingerprint

    Telescopes
    Pixels
    Web services
    Probability distributions
    Calibration
    Sampling
    Experiments
    Uncertainty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Engineering(all)

    Cite this

    Hogg, D. W., & Lang, D. (2011). Telescopes don't make catalogues! In GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry (Vol. 45, pp. 351-358). (EAS Publications Series; Vol. 45). https://doi.org/10.1051/eas/1045059

    Telescopes don't make catalogues! / Hogg, D. W.; Lang, D.

    GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry. Vol. 45 2011. p. 351-358 (EAS Publications Series; Vol. 45).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Hogg, DW & Lang, D 2011, Telescopes don't make catalogues! in GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry. vol. 45, EAS Publications Series, vol. 45, pp. 351-358, Symposium - GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry, Sevres, France, 6/7/10. https://doi.org/10.1051/eas/1045059
    Hogg DW, Lang D. Telescopes don't make catalogues! In GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry. Vol. 45. 2011. p. 351-358. (EAS Publications Series). https://doi.org/10.1051/eas/1045059
    Hogg, D. W. ; Lang, D. / Telescopes don't make catalogues!. GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry. Vol. 45 2011. pp. 351-358 (EAS Publications Series).
    @inproceedings{103eed34bf3a4b63b771edaa7a3a1bb6,
    title = "Telescopes don't make catalogues!",
    abstract = "Telescopes don't make catalogues, they make intensity measurements; any precise experiment performed with a telescope ought to involve modelling those measurements. People make catalogues, but because a catalogue requires hard decisions about calibration and detection, no catalogue can contain all of the information in the raw pixels relevant to most scientific investigations. Here we advocate making catalogue-like data outputs that permit investigators to test hypotheses with almost the power of the original image pixels. The key is to provide users approximations to likelihood tests against the raw image pixels. We advocate three options, in order of increasing difficulty: The first is to define catalogue entries and associated uncertainties such that the catalogue contains the parameters of an approximate description of the image-level likelihood function. The second is to produce a K-catalogue sampling in {"}catalogue space{"} that samples a posterior probability distribution of catalogues given the data. The third is to expose a web service or equivalent that can compute the full image-level likelihood for any user-supplied catalogue.",
    author = "Hogg, {D. W.} and D. Lang",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1051/eas/1045059",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9782759806089",
    volume = "45",
    series = "EAS Publications Series",
    pages = "351--358",
    booktitle = "GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Telescopes don't make catalogues!

    AU - Hogg, D. W.

    AU - Lang, D.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Telescopes don't make catalogues, they make intensity measurements; any precise experiment performed with a telescope ought to involve modelling those measurements. People make catalogues, but because a catalogue requires hard decisions about calibration and detection, no catalogue can contain all of the information in the raw pixels relevant to most scientific investigations. Here we advocate making catalogue-like data outputs that permit investigators to test hypotheses with almost the power of the original image pixels. The key is to provide users approximations to likelihood tests against the raw image pixels. We advocate three options, in order of increasing difficulty: The first is to define catalogue entries and associated uncertainties such that the catalogue contains the parameters of an approximate description of the image-level likelihood function. The second is to produce a K-catalogue sampling in "catalogue space" that samples a posterior probability distribution of catalogues given the data. The third is to expose a web service or equivalent that can compute the full image-level likelihood for any user-supplied catalogue.

    AB - Telescopes don't make catalogues, they make intensity measurements; any precise experiment performed with a telescope ought to involve modelling those measurements. People make catalogues, but because a catalogue requires hard decisions about calibration and detection, no catalogue can contain all of the information in the raw pixels relevant to most scientific investigations. Here we advocate making catalogue-like data outputs that permit investigators to test hypotheses with almost the power of the original image pixels. The key is to provide users approximations to likelihood tests against the raw image pixels. We advocate three options, in order of increasing difficulty: The first is to define catalogue entries and associated uncertainties such that the catalogue contains the parameters of an approximate description of the image-level likelihood function. The second is to produce a K-catalogue sampling in "catalogue space" that samples a posterior probability distribution of catalogues given the data. The third is to expose a web service or equivalent that can compute the full image-level likelihood for any user-supplied catalogue.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956124735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956124735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1051/eas/1045059

    DO - 10.1051/eas/1045059

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9782759806089

    VL - 45

    T3 - EAS Publications Series

    SP - 351

    EP - 358

    BT - GAIA: At the Frontiers of Astrometry

    ER -