Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units

Camillia Matuk, Marcia C. Linn, Bat Sheva Eylon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Teachers’ involvement in curriculum design is essential for sustaining the relevance of technology-enhanced learning materials. Customizing—making small adjustments to tailor given materials to particular situations and settings—is one design activity in which busy teachers can feasibly engage. Research indicates that customizations based in evidence from student work lead to improved learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine the customizations of four middle and high school teachers during their enactments of web-based inquiry science units. We examine how specific technology features afforded their customizations by providing tools for making adaptations and by making student work available as evidence for those adaptations. Cases built from classroom video and field note observations, interviews, and teachers’ curriculum artifacts, revealed three kinds of customizations: (a) devising timely instructional interventions to provide individualized guidance; (b) planning activities and adjusting milestones to align with students’ progress; (c) modifying existing materials to better integrate content into overall curriculum plans; and (d) incorporating scaffolds to better address students’ needs. We also identified three technology features that supported teachers’ customizations: (1) a system that logs student work for teachers’ inspection; (2) tools for conducting dynamic, formative assessment; and (3) an authoring environment that supports the re-design of units at multiple levels of granularity. We end by suggesting design principles for curriculum materials that support teachers’ customizations, as well as future directions for technology that would enhance teachers’ participation as designers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-257
Number of pages29
JournalInstructional Science
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Students
Technology
teacher
evidence
student
curriculum
Learning
Social Adjustment
Artifacts
Interviews
learning
artifact
Research
video
classroom
planning
participation
interview
science

Keywords

  • Curriculum customization
  • Middle school science inquiry
  • Teachers-as-designers
  • Technology-enhanced curriculum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. / Matuk, Camillia; Linn, Marcia C.; Eylon, Bat Sheva.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2015, p. 229-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3314190201d44cdb86a4e73156bb4d82,
title = "Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units",
abstract = "Teachers’ involvement in curriculum design is essential for sustaining the relevance of technology-enhanced learning materials. Customizing—making small adjustments to tailor given materials to particular situations and settings—is one design activity in which busy teachers can feasibly engage. Research indicates that customizations based in evidence from student work lead to improved learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine the customizations of four middle and high school teachers during their enactments of web-based inquiry science units. We examine how specific technology features afforded their customizations by providing tools for making adaptations and by making student work available as evidence for those adaptations. Cases built from classroom video and field note observations, interviews, and teachers’ curriculum artifacts, revealed three kinds of customizations: (a) devising timely instructional interventions to provide individualized guidance; (b) planning activities and adjusting milestones to align with students’ progress; (c) modifying existing materials to better integrate content into overall curriculum plans; and (d) incorporating scaffolds to better address students’ needs. We also identified three technology features that supported teachers’ customizations: (1) a system that logs student work for teachers’ inspection; (2) tools for conducting dynamic, formative assessment; and (3) an authoring environment that supports the re-design of units at multiple levels of granularity. We end by suggesting design principles for curriculum materials that support teachers’ customizations, as well as future directions for technology that would enhance teachers’ participation as designers.",
keywords = "Curriculum customization, Middle school science inquiry, Teachers-as-designers, Technology-enhanced curriculum",
author = "Camillia Matuk and Linn, {Marcia C.} and Eylon, {Bat Sheva}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "229--257",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units

AU - Matuk, Camillia

AU - Linn, Marcia C.

AU - Eylon, Bat Sheva

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Teachers’ involvement in curriculum design is essential for sustaining the relevance of technology-enhanced learning materials. Customizing—making small adjustments to tailor given materials to particular situations and settings—is one design activity in which busy teachers can feasibly engage. Research indicates that customizations based in evidence from student work lead to improved learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine the customizations of four middle and high school teachers during their enactments of web-based inquiry science units. We examine how specific technology features afforded their customizations by providing tools for making adaptations and by making student work available as evidence for those adaptations. Cases built from classroom video and field note observations, interviews, and teachers’ curriculum artifacts, revealed three kinds of customizations: (a) devising timely instructional interventions to provide individualized guidance; (b) planning activities and adjusting milestones to align with students’ progress; (c) modifying existing materials to better integrate content into overall curriculum plans; and (d) incorporating scaffolds to better address students’ needs. We also identified three technology features that supported teachers’ customizations: (1) a system that logs student work for teachers’ inspection; (2) tools for conducting dynamic, formative assessment; and (3) an authoring environment that supports the re-design of units at multiple levels of granularity. We end by suggesting design principles for curriculum materials that support teachers’ customizations, as well as future directions for technology that would enhance teachers’ participation as designers.

AB - Teachers’ involvement in curriculum design is essential for sustaining the relevance of technology-enhanced learning materials. Customizing—making small adjustments to tailor given materials to particular situations and settings—is one design activity in which busy teachers can feasibly engage. Research indicates that customizations based in evidence from student work lead to improved learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine the customizations of four middle and high school teachers during their enactments of web-based inquiry science units. We examine how specific technology features afforded their customizations by providing tools for making adaptations and by making student work available as evidence for those adaptations. Cases built from classroom video and field note observations, interviews, and teachers’ curriculum artifacts, revealed three kinds of customizations: (a) devising timely instructional interventions to provide individualized guidance; (b) planning activities and adjusting milestones to align with students’ progress; (c) modifying existing materials to better integrate content into overall curriculum plans; and (d) incorporating scaffolds to better address students’ needs. We also identified three technology features that supported teachers’ customizations: (1) a system that logs student work for teachers’ inspection; (2) tools for conducting dynamic, formative assessment; and (3) an authoring environment that supports the re-design of units at multiple levels of granularity. We end by suggesting design principles for curriculum materials that support teachers’ customizations, as well as future directions for technology that would enhance teachers’ participation as designers.

KW - Curriculum customization

KW - Middle school science inquiry

KW - Teachers-as-designers

KW - Technology-enhanced curriculum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925513633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925513633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1

DO - 10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 229

EP - 257

JO - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 2

ER -