Technologies of truth in the anthropology of conflict

AES/APLA Presidential Address, 2013

Sally Merry, Susan Bibler Coutin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Science and technology studies can help to unveil invisible modes of power that are embedded in the ways conflicts are known, debated, and resolved. Legal forms of adjudication, reporting systems used by international commissions, and data gathering on the part of governmental and nongovernmental agencies shape how conflicts are fought out on the ground and in policy arenas. Assumptions about evidence, categorization, adjudication, and measurement privilege certain forms of suffering over others, even as they omit phenomena that defy categorization. Using two examples-a global survey of violence against women and a U.S. government initiative to defer the deportation of certain undocumented immigrants-we bring insights from science and technology studies to bear on sociolegal phenomena. In so doing, we highlight tensions between measurement and invention, visibility and invisibility, and objectivity and discretion that are intrinsic to new forms of governance. We thus examine what measurement initiates and precludes, the reactive and proactive nature of technologies, and how new practices reproduce established techniques.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-16
    Number of pages16
    JournalAmerican Ethnologist
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2014

    Fingerprint

    anthropology
    technology studies
    science studies
    legal form
    deportation
    reporting system
    objectivity
    invention
    privilege
    immigrant
    governance
    violence
    evidence

    Keywords

    • Gender violence
    • Governmentality
    • Human rights
    • Immigration
    • Knowledge production
    • Legal anthropology
    • Science and technology studies

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology

    Cite this

    Technologies of truth in the anthropology of conflict : AES/APLA Presidential Address, 2013. / Merry, Sally; Coutin, Susan Bibler.

    In: American Ethnologist, Vol. 41, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 1-16.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Merry, Sally ; Coutin, Susan Bibler. / Technologies of truth in the anthropology of conflict : AES/APLA Presidential Address, 2013. In: American Ethnologist. 2014 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 1-16.
    @article{a0fa3f2adaa94909b6f77129d311c3dd,
    title = "Technologies of truth in the anthropology of conflict: AES/APLA Presidential Address, 2013",
    abstract = "Science and technology studies can help to unveil invisible modes of power that are embedded in the ways conflicts are known, debated, and resolved. Legal forms of adjudication, reporting systems used by international commissions, and data gathering on the part of governmental and nongovernmental agencies shape how conflicts are fought out on the ground and in policy arenas. Assumptions about evidence, categorization, adjudication, and measurement privilege certain forms of suffering over others, even as they omit phenomena that defy categorization. Using two examples-a global survey of violence against women and a U.S. government initiative to defer the deportation of certain undocumented immigrants-we bring insights from science and technology studies to bear on sociolegal phenomena. In so doing, we highlight tensions between measurement and invention, visibility and invisibility, and objectivity and discretion that are intrinsic to new forms of governance. We thus examine what measurement initiates and precludes, the reactive and proactive nature of technologies, and how new practices reproduce established techniques.",
    keywords = "Gender violence, Governmentality, Human rights, Immigration, Knowledge production, Legal anthropology, Science and technology studies",
    author = "Sally Merry and Coutin, {Susan Bibler}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1111/amet.12055",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "1--16",
    journal = "American Ethnologist",
    issn = "0094-0496",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Technologies of truth in the anthropology of conflict

    T2 - AES/APLA Presidential Address, 2013

    AU - Merry, Sally

    AU - Coutin, Susan Bibler

    PY - 2014/2

    Y1 - 2014/2

    N2 - Science and technology studies can help to unveil invisible modes of power that are embedded in the ways conflicts are known, debated, and resolved. Legal forms of adjudication, reporting systems used by international commissions, and data gathering on the part of governmental and nongovernmental agencies shape how conflicts are fought out on the ground and in policy arenas. Assumptions about evidence, categorization, adjudication, and measurement privilege certain forms of suffering over others, even as they omit phenomena that defy categorization. Using two examples-a global survey of violence against women and a U.S. government initiative to defer the deportation of certain undocumented immigrants-we bring insights from science and technology studies to bear on sociolegal phenomena. In so doing, we highlight tensions between measurement and invention, visibility and invisibility, and objectivity and discretion that are intrinsic to new forms of governance. We thus examine what measurement initiates and precludes, the reactive and proactive nature of technologies, and how new practices reproduce established techniques.

    AB - Science and technology studies can help to unveil invisible modes of power that are embedded in the ways conflicts are known, debated, and resolved. Legal forms of adjudication, reporting systems used by international commissions, and data gathering on the part of governmental and nongovernmental agencies shape how conflicts are fought out on the ground and in policy arenas. Assumptions about evidence, categorization, adjudication, and measurement privilege certain forms of suffering over others, even as they omit phenomena that defy categorization. Using two examples-a global survey of violence against women and a U.S. government initiative to defer the deportation of certain undocumented immigrants-we bring insights from science and technology studies to bear on sociolegal phenomena. In so doing, we highlight tensions between measurement and invention, visibility and invisibility, and objectivity and discretion that are intrinsic to new forms of governance. We thus examine what measurement initiates and precludes, the reactive and proactive nature of technologies, and how new practices reproduce established techniques.

    KW - Gender violence

    KW - Governmentality

    KW - Human rights

    KW - Immigration

    KW - Knowledge production

    KW - Legal anthropology

    KW - Science and technology studies

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894100237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894100237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/amet.12055

    DO - 10.1111/amet.12055

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 1

    EP - 16

    JO - American Ethnologist

    JF - American Ethnologist

    SN - 0094-0496

    IS - 1

    ER -