Task demand not so damning: Improved techniques that mitigate demand in studies that support top-down effects

Emily Balcetis, Shana Cole

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) techniques to combat task demand by manipulating expectations and offering alternative cover stories are fundamentally flawed because they introduce new forms of demand. We review five superior techniques to mitigate demand used in confirmatory studies of top-down effects. We encourage researchers to apply the same standards when evaluating evidence on both sides of the debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e230
JournalThe Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Task demand not so damning : Improved techniques that mitigate demand in studies that support top-down effects. / Balcetis, Emily; Cole, Shana.

In: The Behavioral and brain sciences, Vol. 39, 01.01.2016, p. e230.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d6eaf410bf55481f83555cf776fb655a,
title = "Task demand not so damning: Improved techniques that mitigate demand in studies that support top-down effects",
abstract = "Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) techniques to combat task demand by manipulating expectations and offering alternative cover stories are fundamentally flawed because they introduce new forms of demand. We review five superior techniques to mitigate demand used in confirmatory studies of top-down effects. We encourage researchers to apply the same standards when evaluating evidence on both sides of the debate.",
author = "Emily Balcetis and Shana Cole",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15002538",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "e230",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task demand not so damning

T2 - Improved techniques that mitigate demand in studies that support top-down effects

AU - Balcetis, Emily

AU - Cole, Shana

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) techniques to combat task demand by manipulating expectations and offering alternative cover stories are fundamentally flawed because they introduce new forms of demand. We review five superior techniques to mitigate demand used in confirmatory studies of top-down effects. We encourage researchers to apply the same standards when evaluating evidence on both sides of the debate.

AB - Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) techniques to combat task demand by manipulating expectations and offering alternative cover stories are fundamentally flawed because they introduce new forms of demand. We review five superior techniques to mitigate demand used in confirmatory studies of top-down effects. We encourage researchers to apply the same standards when evaluating evidence on both sides of the debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054391592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054391592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15002538

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15002538

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28355847

AN - SCOPUS:85054391592

VL - 39

SP - e230

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -