Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms

The emergence of boundary-spanning practices

Natalia Levina, Anne-Laure Fayard

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Crowdsourcing for innovation is gaining critical momentum, with an increasing number of organizations engaging with digital platforms. While collecting ideas from a broad set of participants is now easier than ever, combining and deploying them in innovative ways is becoming increasingly difficult. As a result, organizations are faced with challenges in productively integrating ideas generated by the crowd. Organizations seeking to learn about and combine new perspectives have traditionally turned to consulting companies to tap into external expertise. In this chapter, we compare how consulting companies approach the problem of translating and integrating across a diversity of expertise with how external innovation is addressed in innovation-focused crowdsourcing platforms. We examine the nature of boundaries that arise in both types of endeavors and draw on boundary-spanning theories to develop an understanding of the differences between traditional ways of integrating diverse ideas compared with digitally mediated approaches.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationCreating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages204-235
    Number of pages32
    ISBN (Electronic)9780198816225
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    Innovation
    Open innovation
    Boundary spanning
    Expertise
    Consulting
    Momentum

    Keywords

    • Boundary spanning
    • Consulting
    • Crowdsourcing
    • Digital platforms
    • Idea integration
    • Innovation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
    • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

    Cite this

    Levina, N., & Fayard, A-L. (2018). Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms: The emergence of boundary-spanning practices. In Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing (pp. 204-235). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009

    Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms : The emergence of boundary-spanning practices. / Levina, Natalia; Fayard, Anne-Laure.

    Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 204-235.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Levina, N & Fayard, A-L 2018, Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms: The emergence of boundary-spanning practices. in Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. Oxford University Press, pp. 204-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009
    Levina N, Fayard A-L. Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms: The emergence of boundary-spanning practices. In Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. Oxford University Press. 2018. p. 204-235 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009
    Levina, Natalia ; Fayard, Anne-Laure. / Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms : The emergence of boundary-spanning practices. Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. Oxford University Press, 2018. pp. 204-235
    @inbook{5065f88ffba54069a845485269304ce6,
    title = "Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms: The emergence of boundary-spanning practices",
    abstract = "Crowdsourcing for innovation is gaining critical momentum, with an increasing number of organizations engaging with digital platforms. While collecting ideas from a broad set of participants is now easier than ever, combining and deploying them in innovative ways is becoming increasingly difficult. As a result, organizations are faced with challenges in productively integrating ideas generated by the crowd. Organizations seeking to learn about and combine new perspectives have traditionally turned to consulting companies to tap into external expertise. In this chapter, we compare how consulting companies approach the problem of translating and integrating across a diversity of expertise with how external innovation is addressed in innovation-focused crowdsourcing platforms. We examine the nature of boundaries that arise in both types of endeavors and draw on boundary-spanning theories to develop an understanding of the differences between traditional ways of integrating diverse ideas compared with digitally mediated approaches.",
    keywords = "Boundary spanning, Consulting, Crowdsourcing, Digital platforms, Idea integration, Innovation",
    author = "Natalia Levina and Anne-Laure Fayard",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "204--235",
    booktitle = "Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Tapping into diversity through open innovation platforms

    T2 - The emergence of boundary-spanning practices

    AU - Levina, Natalia

    AU - Fayard, Anne-Laure

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - Crowdsourcing for innovation is gaining critical momentum, with an increasing number of organizations engaging with digital platforms. While collecting ideas from a broad set of participants is now easier than ever, combining and deploying them in innovative ways is becoming increasingly difficult. As a result, organizations are faced with challenges in productively integrating ideas generated by the crowd. Organizations seeking to learn about and combine new perspectives have traditionally turned to consulting companies to tap into external expertise. In this chapter, we compare how consulting companies approach the problem of translating and integrating across a diversity of expertise with how external innovation is addressed in innovation-focused crowdsourcing platforms. We examine the nature of boundaries that arise in both types of endeavors and draw on boundary-spanning theories to develop an understanding of the differences between traditional ways of integrating diverse ideas compared with digitally mediated approaches.

    AB - Crowdsourcing for innovation is gaining critical momentum, with an increasing number of organizations engaging with digital platforms. While collecting ideas from a broad set of participants is now easier than ever, combining and deploying them in innovative ways is becoming increasingly difficult. As a result, organizations are faced with challenges in productively integrating ideas generated by the crowd. Organizations seeking to learn about and combine new perspectives have traditionally turned to consulting companies to tap into external expertise. In this chapter, we compare how consulting companies approach the problem of translating and integrating across a diversity of expertise with how external innovation is addressed in innovation-focused crowdsourcing platforms. We examine the nature of boundaries that arise in both types of endeavors and draw on boundary-spanning theories to develop an understanding of the differences between traditional ways of integrating diverse ideas compared with digitally mediated approaches.

    KW - Boundary spanning

    KW - Consulting

    KW - Crowdsourcing

    KW - Digital platforms

    KW - Idea integration

    KW - Innovation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051614873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051614873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009

    DO - 10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0009

    M3 - Chapter

    SP - 204

    EP - 235

    BT - Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing

    PB - Oxford University Press

    ER -