Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy

Colin Jerolmack, Shamus Khan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article examines the methodological implications of the fact that what people say is often a poor predictor of what they do. We argue that many interview and survey researchers routinely conflate self-reports with behavior and assume a consistency between attitudes and action. We call this erroneous inference of situated behavior from verbal accounts the attitudinal fallacy. Though interviewing and ethnography are often lumped together as "qualitative methods," by juxtaposing studies of "culture in action" based on verbal accounts with ethnographic investigations, we show that the latter routinely attempts to explain the "attitude-behavior problem" while the former regularly ignores it. Because meaning and action are collectively negotiated and context-dependent, we contend that self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are of limited value in explaining what people actually do because they are overly individualistic and abstracted from lived experience.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)178-209
    Number of pages32
    JournalSociological Methods and Research
    Volume43
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    ethnography
    qualitative method
    interview
    experience

    Keywords

    • attitudinal fallacy
    • culture
    • ethnography
    • interaction
    • methods

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Talk Is Cheap : Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy. / Jerolmack, Colin; Khan, Shamus.

    In: Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2014, p. 178-209.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jerolmack, Colin ; Khan, Shamus. / Talk Is Cheap : Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy. In: Sociological Methods and Research. 2014 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 178-209.
    @article{dafa9fb84e1c462f842e7a8d44bd0e72,
    title = "Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy",
    abstract = "This article examines the methodological implications of the fact that what people say is often a poor predictor of what they do. We argue that many interview and survey researchers routinely conflate self-reports with behavior and assume a consistency between attitudes and action. We call this erroneous inference of situated behavior from verbal accounts the attitudinal fallacy. Though interviewing and ethnography are often lumped together as {"}qualitative methods,{"} by juxtaposing studies of {"}culture in action{"} based on verbal accounts with ethnographic investigations, we show that the latter routinely attempts to explain the {"}attitude-behavior problem{"} while the former regularly ignores it. Because meaning and action are collectively negotiated and context-dependent, we contend that self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are of limited value in explaining what people actually do because they are overly individualistic and abstracted from lived experience.",
    keywords = "attitudinal fallacy, culture, ethnography, interaction, methods",
    author = "Colin Jerolmack and Shamus Khan",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1177/0049124114523396",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "178--209",
    journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
    issn = "0049-1241",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Talk Is Cheap

    T2 - Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy

    AU - Jerolmack, Colin

    AU - Khan, Shamus

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This article examines the methodological implications of the fact that what people say is often a poor predictor of what they do. We argue that many interview and survey researchers routinely conflate self-reports with behavior and assume a consistency between attitudes and action. We call this erroneous inference of situated behavior from verbal accounts the attitudinal fallacy. Though interviewing and ethnography are often lumped together as "qualitative methods," by juxtaposing studies of "culture in action" based on verbal accounts with ethnographic investigations, we show that the latter routinely attempts to explain the "attitude-behavior problem" while the former regularly ignores it. Because meaning and action are collectively negotiated and context-dependent, we contend that self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are of limited value in explaining what people actually do because they are overly individualistic and abstracted from lived experience.

    AB - This article examines the methodological implications of the fact that what people say is often a poor predictor of what they do. We argue that many interview and survey researchers routinely conflate self-reports with behavior and assume a consistency between attitudes and action. We call this erroneous inference of situated behavior from verbal accounts the attitudinal fallacy. Though interviewing and ethnography are often lumped together as "qualitative methods," by juxtaposing studies of "culture in action" based on verbal accounts with ethnographic investigations, we show that the latter routinely attempts to explain the "attitude-behavior problem" while the former regularly ignores it. Because meaning and action are collectively negotiated and context-dependent, we contend that self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are of limited value in explaining what people actually do because they are overly individualistic and abstracted from lived experience.

    KW - attitudinal fallacy

    KW - culture

    KW - ethnography

    KW - interaction

    KW - methods

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899743201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899743201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0049124114523396

    DO - 10.1177/0049124114523396

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84899743201

    VL - 43

    SP - 178

    EP - 209

    JO - Sociological Methods and Research

    JF - Sociological Methods and Research

    SN - 0049-1241

    IS - 2

    ER -