Taking Race Off the Table: Agenda Setting and Support for Color-Blind Public Policy

Rosalind M. Chow, Eric D. Knowles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Whites are theorized to support color-blind policies as an act of racial agenda setting—an attempt to defend the existing hierarchy by excluding race from public and institutional discourse. The present analysis leverages work distinguishing between two forms of social dominance orientation (SDO): passive opposition to equality (SDO-E) and active desire for dominance (SDO-D). We hypothesized that agenda setting, as a subtle hierarchy-maintenance strategy, would be uniquely tied to high levels of SDO-E. When made to believe that the hierarchy was under threat, Whites high in SDO-E increased their endorsement of color-blind policy (Study 1), particularly when the racial hierarchy was framed as ingroup advantage (Study 2), and became less willing to include race as a topic in a hypothetical presidential debate (Study 3). Across studies, Whites high in SDO-D showed no affinity for agenda setting as a hierarchy-maintenance strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-39
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Social Dominance
Public Policy
Color
Maintenance

Keywords

  • agenda setting
  • color-blind policy
  • hierarchy maintenance
  • social dominance orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Taking Race Off the Table : Agenda Setting and Support for Color-Blind Public Policy. / Chow, Rosalind M.; Knowles, Eric D.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 25-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0e1caba95bd4f76be630fa48908f636,
title = "Taking Race Off the Table: Agenda Setting and Support for Color-Blind Public Policy",
abstract = "Whites are theorized to support color-blind policies as an act of racial agenda setting—an attempt to defend the existing hierarchy by excluding race from public and institutional discourse. The present analysis leverages work distinguishing between two forms of social dominance orientation (SDO): passive opposition to equality (SDO-E) and active desire for dominance (SDO-D). We hypothesized that agenda setting, as a subtle hierarchy-maintenance strategy, would be uniquely tied to high levels of SDO-E. When made to believe that the hierarchy was under threat, Whites high in SDO-E increased their endorsement of color-blind policy (Study 1), particularly when the racial hierarchy was framed as ingroup advantage (Study 2), and became less willing to include race as a topic in a hypothetical presidential debate (Study 3). Across studies, Whites high in SDO-D showed no affinity for agenda setting as a hierarchy-maintenance strategy.",
keywords = "agenda setting, color-blind policy, hierarchy maintenance, social dominance orientation",
author = "Chow, {Rosalind M.} and Knowles, {Eric D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167215611637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "25--39",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Race Off the Table

T2 - Agenda Setting and Support for Color-Blind Public Policy

AU - Chow, Rosalind M.

AU - Knowles, Eric D.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Whites are theorized to support color-blind policies as an act of racial agenda setting—an attempt to defend the existing hierarchy by excluding race from public and institutional discourse. The present analysis leverages work distinguishing between two forms of social dominance orientation (SDO): passive opposition to equality (SDO-E) and active desire for dominance (SDO-D). We hypothesized that agenda setting, as a subtle hierarchy-maintenance strategy, would be uniquely tied to high levels of SDO-E. When made to believe that the hierarchy was under threat, Whites high in SDO-E increased their endorsement of color-blind policy (Study 1), particularly when the racial hierarchy was framed as ingroup advantage (Study 2), and became less willing to include race as a topic in a hypothetical presidential debate (Study 3). Across studies, Whites high in SDO-D showed no affinity for agenda setting as a hierarchy-maintenance strategy.

AB - Whites are theorized to support color-blind policies as an act of racial agenda setting—an attempt to defend the existing hierarchy by excluding race from public and institutional discourse. The present analysis leverages work distinguishing between two forms of social dominance orientation (SDO): passive opposition to equality (SDO-E) and active desire for dominance (SDO-D). We hypothesized that agenda setting, as a subtle hierarchy-maintenance strategy, would be uniquely tied to high levels of SDO-E. When made to believe that the hierarchy was under threat, Whites high in SDO-E increased their endorsement of color-blind policy (Study 1), particularly when the racial hierarchy was framed as ingroup advantage (Study 2), and became less willing to include race as a topic in a hypothetical presidential debate (Study 3). Across studies, Whites high in SDO-D showed no affinity for agenda setting as a hierarchy-maintenance strategy.

KW - agenda setting

KW - color-blind policy

KW - hierarchy maintenance

KW - social dominance orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948694429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948694429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167215611637

DO - 10.1177/0146167215611637

M3 - Article

C2 - 26481450

AN - SCOPUS:84948694429

VL - 42

SP - 25

EP - 39

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 1

ER -