Tactical coalition voting and information in the laboratory

Brian McCuen, Rebecca B. Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Tactical coalition voting (TCV) is a balancing strategy where voters choose to vote for their second preferred party in order to influence the policy direction of the government coalition formed. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the extent voters in a PR system engage in TCV. We find significant evidence that voters in the laboratory, even those not experienced with PR systems, choose strategically to affect post election coalitions using a balancing strategy, although the percentage of voters who do so is much less than that predicted by the theory. We also find that although voters who are less informed are less likely to use a balancing strategy, strategic motivations are still a factor in their behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-328
Number of pages13
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

voting
coalition
voter
election
evidence

Keywords

  • Experiments
  • Government coalition formation
  • Laboratory experiments
  • Strategic voting
  • Tactical coalition voting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Tactical coalition voting and information in the laboratory. / McCuen, Brian; Morton, Rebecca B.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 316-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78a1818adabe49a99ae505e8c3bac34d,
title = "Tactical coalition voting and information in the laboratory",
abstract = "Tactical coalition voting (TCV) is a balancing strategy where voters choose to vote for their second preferred party in order to influence the policy direction of the government coalition formed. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the extent voters in a PR system engage in TCV. We find significant evidence that voters in the laboratory, even those not experienced with PR systems, choose strategically to affect post election coalitions using a balancing strategy, although the percentage of voters who do so is much less than that predicted by the theory. We also find that although voters who are less informed are less likely to use a balancing strategy, strategic motivations are still a factor in their behavior.",
keywords = "Experiments, Government coalition formation, Laboratory experiments, Strategic voting, Tactical coalition voting",
author = "Brian McCuen and Morton, {Rebecca B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "316--328",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tactical coalition voting and information in the laboratory

AU - McCuen, Brian

AU - Morton, Rebecca B.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Tactical coalition voting (TCV) is a balancing strategy where voters choose to vote for their second preferred party in order to influence the policy direction of the government coalition formed. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the extent voters in a PR system engage in TCV. We find significant evidence that voters in the laboratory, even those not experienced with PR systems, choose strategically to affect post election coalitions using a balancing strategy, although the percentage of voters who do so is much less than that predicted by the theory. We also find that although voters who are less informed are less likely to use a balancing strategy, strategic motivations are still a factor in their behavior.

AB - Tactical coalition voting (TCV) is a balancing strategy where voters choose to vote for their second preferred party in order to influence the policy direction of the government coalition formed. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the extent voters in a PR system engage in TCV. We find significant evidence that voters in the laboratory, even those not experienced with PR systems, choose strategically to affect post election coalitions using a balancing strategy, although the percentage of voters who do so is much less than that predicted by the theory. We also find that although voters who are less informed are less likely to use a balancing strategy, strategic motivations are still a factor in their behavior.

KW - Experiments

KW - Government coalition formation

KW - Laboratory experiments

KW - Strategic voting

KW - Tactical coalition voting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954628130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954628130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954628130

VL - 29

SP - 316

EP - 328

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

IS - 3

ER -