Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls

Miriam J.J. de Kleijn, Melissa M. Farmer, Marika Booth, Aneesa Motala, Alexandria Smith, Scott Sherman, Willem J.J. Assendelft, Paul Shekelle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. Results: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I 2=75 %). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. Conclusions: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 2015

Fingerprint

Smoking
Mass Media
Databases
Social Sciences
PubMed
Tobacco
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Cigarette smoking
  • Girls
  • Prevention
  • Schools
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

de Kleijn, M. J. J., Farmer, M. M., Booth, M., Motala, A., Smith, A., Sherman, S., ... Shekelle, P. (2015). Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), [109]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7

Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls. / de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.; Farmer, Melissa M.; Booth, Marika; Motala, Aneesa; Smith, Alexandria; Sherman, Scott; Assendelft, Willem J.J.; Shekelle, Paul.

In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 4, No. 1, 109, 14.08.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

de Kleijn, MJJ, Farmer, MM, Booth, M, Motala, A, Smith, A, Sherman, S, Assendelft, WJJ & Shekelle, P 2015, 'Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls', Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, no. 1, 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7
de Kleijn, Miriam J.J. ; Farmer, Melissa M. ; Booth, Marika ; Motala, Aneesa ; Smith, Alexandria ; Sherman, Scott ; Assendelft, Willem J.J. ; Shekelle, Paul. / Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls. In: Systematic Reviews. 2015 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{89fd200d2ddb4af086b83f38685add00,
title = "Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. Results: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 {\%} confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I 2=75 {\%}). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. Conclusions: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs.",
keywords = "Cigarette smoking, Girls, Prevention, Schools, Systematic review",
author = "{de Kleijn}, {Miriam J.J.} and Farmer, {Melissa M.} and Marika Booth and Aneesa Motala and Alexandria Smith and Scott Sherman and Assendelft, {Willem J.J.} and Paul Shekelle",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls

AU - de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.

AU - Farmer, Melissa M.

AU - Booth, Marika

AU - Motala, Aneesa

AU - Smith, Alexandria

AU - Sherman, Scott

AU - Assendelft, Willem J.J.

AU - Shekelle, Paul

PY - 2015/8/14

Y1 - 2015/8/14

N2 - Background: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. Results: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I 2=75 %). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. Conclusions: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs.

AB - Background: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. Results: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I 2=75 %). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. Conclusions: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs.

KW - Cigarette smoking

KW - Girls

KW - Prevention

KW - Schools

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939131066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939131066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7

DO - 10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 1

M1 - 109

ER -