Systematic errors in weak lensing: Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing

Rachel Mandelbaum, Christopher M. Hirata, Uroš Seljak, Jacek Guzik, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Cullen Blake, Michael R. Blanton, Robert Lupton, Jonathan Brinkmann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Weak lensing is emerging as a powerful observational tool to constrain cosmological models, but is at present limited by an incomplete understanding of many sources of systematic error. Many of these errors are multiplicative and depend on the population of background galaxies. We show how the commonly cited geometric test, which is rather insensitive to cosmology, can be used as a ratio test of systematics in the lensing signal at the 1 per cent level. We apply this test to the galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which at present is the sample with the highest weak lensing signal-to-noise ratio and has the additional advantage of spectroscopic redshifts for lenses. This allows one to perform meaningful geometric tests of systematics for different subsamples of galaxies at different mean redshifts, such as brighter galaxies, fainter galaxies and high-redshift luminous red galaxies, both with and without photometric redshift estimates. We use overlapping objects between SDSS and the DEEP2 and 2df-Sloan LRG and Quasar (2SLAQ) spectroscopic surveys to establish accurate calibration of photometric redshifts and to determine the redshift distributions for SDSS. We use these redshift results to compute the projected surface density contrast Δ ∑ around 259609 spectroscopic galaxies in the SDSS; by measuring Δ ∑ with different source samples we establish consistency of the results at the 10 per cent level (1σ). We also use the ratio test to constrain shear calibration biases and other systematics in the SDSS survey data to determine the overall galaxy-galaxy weak lensing signal calibration uncertainty. We find no evidence of any inconsistency among many subsamples of the data.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1287-1322
    Number of pages36
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume361
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 21 2005

    Fingerprint

    systematic errors
    galaxies
    calibration
    cosmology
    signal-to-noise ratio
    test
    quasars
    emerging
    signal to noise ratios
    lenses
    shear
    estimates

    Keywords

    • Galaxies: distances and redshifts
    • Galaxies: halos
    • Gravitational lensing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Space and Planetary Science

    Cite this

    Mandelbaum, R., Hirata, C. M., Seljak, U., Guzik, J., Padmanabhan, N., Blake, C., ... Brinkmann, J. (2005). Systematic errors in weak lensing: Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 361(4), 1287-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x

    Systematic errors in weak lensing : Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. / Mandelbaum, Rachel; Hirata, Christopher M.; Seljak, Uroš; Guzik, Jacek; Padmanabhan, Nikhil; Blake, Cullen; Blanton, Michael R.; Lupton, Robert; Brinkmann, Jonathan.

    In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 361, No. 4, 21.08.2005, p. 1287-1322.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mandelbaum, R, Hirata, CM, Seljak, U, Guzik, J, Padmanabhan, N, Blake, C, Blanton, MR, Lupton, R & Brinkmann, J 2005, 'Systematic errors in weak lensing: Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 361, no. 4, pp. 1287-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x
    Mandelbaum, Rachel ; Hirata, Christopher M. ; Seljak, Uroš ; Guzik, Jacek ; Padmanabhan, Nikhil ; Blake, Cullen ; Blanton, Michael R. ; Lupton, Robert ; Brinkmann, Jonathan. / Systematic errors in weak lensing : Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2005 ; Vol. 361, No. 4. pp. 1287-1322.
    @article{35afee42c8d94618ac30145797dcd3ac,
    title = "Systematic errors in weak lensing: Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing",
    abstract = "Weak lensing is emerging as a powerful observational tool to constrain cosmological models, but is at present limited by an incomplete understanding of many sources of systematic error. Many of these errors are multiplicative and depend on the population of background galaxies. We show how the commonly cited geometric test, which is rather insensitive to cosmology, can be used as a ratio test of systematics in the lensing signal at the 1 per cent level. We apply this test to the galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which at present is the sample with the highest weak lensing signal-to-noise ratio and has the additional advantage of spectroscopic redshifts for lenses. This allows one to perform meaningful geometric tests of systematics for different subsamples of galaxies at different mean redshifts, such as brighter galaxies, fainter galaxies and high-redshift luminous red galaxies, both with and without photometric redshift estimates. We use overlapping objects between SDSS and the DEEP2 and 2df-Sloan LRG and Quasar (2SLAQ) spectroscopic surveys to establish accurate calibration of photometric redshifts and to determine the redshift distributions for SDSS. We use these redshift results to compute the projected surface density contrast Δ ∑ around 259609 spectroscopic galaxies in the SDSS; by measuring Δ ∑ with different source samples we establish consistency of the results at the 10 per cent level (1σ). We also use the ratio test to constrain shear calibration biases and other systematics in the SDSS survey data to determine the overall galaxy-galaxy weak lensing signal calibration uncertainty. We find no evidence of any inconsistency among many subsamples of the data.",
    keywords = "Galaxies: distances and redshifts, Galaxies: halos, Gravitational lensing",
    author = "Rachel Mandelbaum and Hirata, {Christopher M.} and Uroš Seljak and Jacek Guzik and Nikhil Padmanabhan and Cullen Blake and Blanton, {Michael R.} and Robert Lupton and Jonathan Brinkmann",
    year = "2005",
    month = "8",
    day = "21",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "361",
    pages = "1287--1322",
    journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
    issn = "0035-8711",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Systematic errors in weak lensing

    T2 - Application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing

    AU - Mandelbaum, Rachel

    AU - Hirata, Christopher M.

    AU - Seljak, Uroš

    AU - Guzik, Jacek

    AU - Padmanabhan, Nikhil

    AU - Blake, Cullen

    AU - Blanton, Michael R.

    AU - Lupton, Robert

    AU - Brinkmann, Jonathan

    PY - 2005/8/21

    Y1 - 2005/8/21

    N2 - Weak lensing is emerging as a powerful observational tool to constrain cosmological models, but is at present limited by an incomplete understanding of many sources of systematic error. Many of these errors are multiplicative and depend on the population of background galaxies. We show how the commonly cited geometric test, which is rather insensitive to cosmology, can be used as a ratio test of systematics in the lensing signal at the 1 per cent level. We apply this test to the galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which at present is the sample with the highest weak lensing signal-to-noise ratio and has the additional advantage of spectroscopic redshifts for lenses. This allows one to perform meaningful geometric tests of systematics for different subsamples of galaxies at different mean redshifts, such as brighter galaxies, fainter galaxies and high-redshift luminous red galaxies, both with and without photometric redshift estimates. We use overlapping objects between SDSS and the DEEP2 and 2df-Sloan LRG and Quasar (2SLAQ) spectroscopic surveys to establish accurate calibration of photometric redshifts and to determine the redshift distributions for SDSS. We use these redshift results to compute the projected surface density contrast Δ ∑ around 259609 spectroscopic galaxies in the SDSS; by measuring Δ ∑ with different source samples we establish consistency of the results at the 10 per cent level (1σ). We also use the ratio test to constrain shear calibration biases and other systematics in the SDSS survey data to determine the overall galaxy-galaxy weak lensing signal calibration uncertainty. We find no evidence of any inconsistency among many subsamples of the data.

    AB - Weak lensing is emerging as a powerful observational tool to constrain cosmological models, but is at present limited by an incomplete understanding of many sources of systematic error. Many of these errors are multiplicative and depend on the population of background galaxies. We show how the commonly cited geometric test, which is rather insensitive to cosmology, can be used as a ratio test of systematics in the lensing signal at the 1 per cent level. We apply this test to the galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which at present is the sample with the highest weak lensing signal-to-noise ratio and has the additional advantage of spectroscopic redshifts for lenses. This allows one to perform meaningful geometric tests of systematics for different subsamples of galaxies at different mean redshifts, such as brighter galaxies, fainter galaxies and high-redshift luminous red galaxies, both with and without photometric redshift estimates. We use overlapping objects between SDSS and the DEEP2 and 2df-Sloan LRG and Quasar (2SLAQ) spectroscopic surveys to establish accurate calibration of photometric redshifts and to determine the redshift distributions for SDSS. We use these redshift results to compute the projected surface density contrast Δ ∑ around 259609 spectroscopic galaxies in the SDSS; by measuring Δ ∑ with different source samples we establish consistency of the results at the 10 per cent level (1σ). We also use the ratio test to constrain shear calibration biases and other systematics in the SDSS survey data to determine the overall galaxy-galaxy weak lensing signal calibration uncertainty. We find no evidence of any inconsistency among many subsamples of the data.

    KW - Galaxies: distances and redshifts

    KW - Galaxies: halos

    KW - Gravitational lensing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944522295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944522295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09282.x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:23944522295

    VL - 361

    SP - 1287

    EP - 1322

    JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    SN - 0035-8711

    IS - 4

    ER -