Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism?

Morris N. Eagle, David L. Wolitzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper considers the issue of systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies raised by Hoffman (2009). A rebuttal of Hoffman's arguments is offered, followed by an argument that each method addresses itself to different questions and that posing them in opposition is not fruitful. Finally, criteria and requirements of the case study method are proposed that, if met, would enhance its evidential value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-818
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Empirical Research
Clinical Studies
Antagonism
Evidentials
Rebuttal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies : A valid antagonism? / Eagle, Morris N.; Wolitzky, David L.

In: Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 59, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 791-818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b26a617f4c3c460ea758626872424162,
title = "Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism?",
abstract = "This paper considers the issue of systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies raised by Hoffman (2009). A rebuttal of Hoffman's arguments is offered, followed by an argument that each method addresses itself to different questions and that posing them in opposition is not fruitful. Finally, criteria and requirements of the case study method are proposed that, if met, would enhance its evidential value.",
author = "Eagle, {Morris N.} and Wolitzky, {David L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0003065111416652",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "791--818",
journal = "Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association",
issn = "0003-0651",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies

T2 - A valid antagonism?

AU - Eagle, Morris N.

AU - Wolitzky, David L.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - This paper considers the issue of systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies raised by Hoffman (2009). A rebuttal of Hoffman's arguments is offered, followed by an argument that each method addresses itself to different questions and that posing them in opposition is not fruitful. Finally, criteria and requirements of the case study method are proposed that, if met, would enhance its evidential value.

AB - This paper considers the issue of systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies raised by Hoffman (2009). A rebuttal of Hoffman's arguments is offered, followed by an argument that each method addresses itself to different questions and that posing them in opposition is not fruitful. Finally, criteria and requirements of the case study method are proposed that, if met, would enhance its evidential value.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053047182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053047182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003065111416652

DO - 10.1177/0003065111416652

M3 - Article

C2 - 21836152

AN - SCOPUS:80053047182

VL - 59

SP - 791

EP - 818

JO - Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

JF - Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

SN - 0003-0651

IS - 4

ER -