System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina

Jaime Napier, Anesu N. Mandisodza, Susan Andersen, John Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examine people's reactions to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, most of whom are minorities living in poverty, and we do so in terms of system justification theory. We propose that the social system was indirectly threatened for the public when inadequate relief efforts exposed governmental shortcomings, called into questio the legitimacy of agency leadership, and highlighted racial inequality in America. In response to such system threats, both victims and observers (e.g., the general public, commentators, policy makers) are known to engage in various forms of system justification, including direct defense of the status quo, victim blaming, stereotyping, and internalization of inequality. These processes can reduce emotional distress and restore perceived legitimacy to the system, but they may have a number of troubling consequences for the storm victims in their efforts to return to normalcy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-73
Number of pages17
JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

hurricane
leadership
poverty
legitimacy
relief
internalization
system theory
social system
public policy
minority
threat
public
defence
systems theory
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. / Napier, Jaime; Mandisodza, Anesu N.; Andersen, Susan; Jost, John.

In: Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 12.2006, p. 57-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{039188c4b05448b5a20f8cb5e298354c,
title = "System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina",
abstract = "We examine people's reactions to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, most of whom are minorities living in poverty, and we do so in terms of system justification theory. We propose that the social system was indirectly threatened for the public when inadequate relief efforts exposed governmental shortcomings, called into questio the legitimacy of agency leadership, and highlighted racial inequality in America. In response to such system threats, both victims and observers (e.g., the general public, commentators, policy makers) are known to engage in various forms of system justification, including direct defense of the status quo, victim blaming, stereotyping, and internalization of inequality. These processes can reduce emotional distress and restore perceived legitimacy to the system, but they may have a number of troubling consequences for the storm victims in their efforts to return to normalcy.",
author = "Jaime Napier and Mandisodza, {Anesu N.} and Susan Andersen and John Jost",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00102.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "57--73",
journal = "Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy",
issn = "1529-7489",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina

AU - Napier, Jaime

AU - Mandisodza, Anesu N.

AU - Andersen, Susan

AU - Jost, John

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - We examine people's reactions to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, most of whom are minorities living in poverty, and we do so in terms of system justification theory. We propose that the social system was indirectly threatened for the public when inadequate relief efforts exposed governmental shortcomings, called into questio the legitimacy of agency leadership, and highlighted racial inequality in America. In response to such system threats, both victims and observers (e.g., the general public, commentators, policy makers) are known to engage in various forms of system justification, including direct defense of the status quo, victim blaming, stereotyping, and internalization of inequality. These processes can reduce emotional distress and restore perceived legitimacy to the system, but they may have a number of troubling consequences for the storm victims in their efforts to return to normalcy.

AB - We examine people's reactions to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, most of whom are minorities living in poverty, and we do so in terms of system justification theory. We propose that the social system was indirectly threatened for the public when inadequate relief efforts exposed governmental shortcomings, called into questio the legitimacy of agency leadership, and highlighted racial inequality in America. In response to such system threats, both victims and observers (e.g., the general public, commentators, policy makers) are known to engage in various forms of system justification, including direct defense of the status quo, victim blaming, stereotyping, and internalization of inequality. These processes can reduce emotional distress and restore perceived legitimacy to the system, but they may have a number of troubling consequences for the storm victims in their efforts to return to normalcy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247208411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247208411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00102.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00102.x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 57

EP - 73

JO - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

JF - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

SN - 1529-7489

IS - 1

ER -