System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict

John T. Jost, Ido Liviatan, Jojanneke Van Der Toorn, Alison Ledgerwood, Anesu Mandisodza, Brian A. Nosek

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

According to system justification theory, people are motivated to defend and legitimize the social systems that affect them. In this chapter, we review 15 years of theory and empirical research demonstrating the motivational underpinnings of system justification processes. We begin by explaining why people are motivated to system justify (i.e., it serves social and psychological needs). We then describe five lines of evidence that corroborate the motivational postulate of system justification theory: (1) Individual differences in self-deception and ideological motivation are linked to system justification; (2) System threat elicits defensive responses on behalf of the system; (3) People engage in biased information-processing in favor of system-serving conclusions; (4) System justification processes exhibit properties of goal pursuit; and (5) The desire to legitimize the system inspires greater behavioral effort. We consider the implications of this motivational approach for understanding situations-including situations involving social conflict-that facilitate resistance to vs. support for social change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationJustice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions
Subtitle of host publicationTheoretical and empirical contributions
EditorsE Kals, J Maes
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Pages315-327
Number of pages13
Volume9783642190353
ISBN (Print)9783642190353, 3642190340, 9783642190346
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

Justification
Social conflict
Individual differences
Social systems
Information processing
Deception
Psychological
Threat
Empirical research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., Van Der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict. In E. Kals, & J. Maes (Eds.), Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions: Theoretical and empirical contributions (Vol. 9783642190353, pp. 315-327). New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19

System justification : A motivational process with implications for social conflict. / Jost, John T.; Liviatan, Ido; Van Der Toorn, Jojanneke; Ledgerwood, Alison; Mandisodza, Anesu; Nosek, Brian A.

Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions: Theoretical and empirical contributions. ed. / E Kals; J Maes. Vol. 9783642190353 New York : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. p. 315-327.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Jost, JT, Liviatan, I, Van Der Toorn, J, Ledgerwood, A, Mandisodza, A & Nosek, BA 2013, System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict. in E Kals & J Maes (eds), Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions: Theoretical and empirical contributions. vol. 9783642190353, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19
Jost JT, Liviatan I, Van Der Toorn J, Ledgerwood A, Mandisodza A, Nosek BA. System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict. In Kals E, Maes J, editors, Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Vol. 9783642190353. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2013. p. 315-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19
Jost, John T. ; Liviatan, Ido ; Van Der Toorn, Jojanneke ; Ledgerwood, Alison ; Mandisodza, Anesu ; Nosek, Brian A. / System justification : A motivational process with implications for social conflict. Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions: Theoretical and empirical contributions. editor / E Kals ; J Maes. Vol. 9783642190353 New York : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. pp. 315-327
@inbook{595bca98b1e1419fb1e71ec9c8eb8070,
title = "System justification: A motivational process with implications for social conflict",
abstract = "According to system justification theory, people are motivated to defend and legitimize the social systems that affect them. In this chapter, we review 15 years of theory and empirical research demonstrating the motivational underpinnings of system justification processes. We begin by explaining why people are motivated to system justify (i.e., it serves social and psychological needs). We then describe five lines of evidence that corroborate the motivational postulate of system justification theory: (1) Individual differences in self-deception and ideological motivation are linked to system justification; (2) System threat elicits defensive responses on behalf of the system; (3) People engage in biased information-processing in favor of system-serving conclusions; (4) System justification processes exhibit properties of goal pursuit; and (5) The desire to legitimize the system inspires greater behavioral effort. We consider the implications of this motivational approach for understanding situations-including situations involving social conflict-that facilitate resistance to vs. support for social change.",
author = "Jost, {John T.} and Ido Liviatan and {Van Der Toorn}, Jojanneke and Alison Ledgerwood and Anesu Mandisodza and Nosek, {Brian A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783642190353",
volume = "9783642190353",
pages = "315--327",
editor = "E Kals and J Maes",
booktitle = "Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - System justification

T2 - A motivational process with implications for social conflict

AU - Jost, John T.

AU - Liviatan, Ido

AU - Van Der Toorn, Jojanneke

AU - Ledgerwood, Alison

AU - Mandisodza, Anesu

AU - Nosek, Brian A.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - According to system justification theory, people are motivated to defend and legitimize the social systems that affect them. In this chapter, we review 15 years of theory and empirical research demonstrating the motivational underpinnings of system justification processes. We begin by explaining why people are motivated to system justify (i.e., it serves social and psychological needs). We then describe five lines of evidence that corroborate the motivational postulate of system justification theory: (1) Individual differences in self-deception and ideological motivation are linked to system justification; (2) System threat elicits defensive responses on behalf of the system; (3) People engage in biased information-processing in favor of system-serving conclusions; (4) System justification processes exhibit properties of goal pursuit; and (5) The desire to legitimize the system inspires greater behavioral effort. We consider the implications of this motivational approach for understanding situations-including situations involving social conflict-that facilitate resistance to vs. support for social change.

AB - According to system justification theory, people are motivated to defend and legitimize the social systems that affect them. In this chapter, we review 15 years of theory and empirical research demonstrating the motivational underpinnings of system justification processes. We begin by explaining why people are motivated to system justify (i.e., it serves social and psychological needs). We then describe five lines of evidence that corroborate the motivational postulate of system justification theory: (1) Individual differences in self-deception and ideological motivation are linked to system justification; (2) System threat elicits defensive responses on behalf of the system; (3) People engage in biased information-processing in favor of system-serving conclusions; (4) System justification processes exhibit properties of goal pursuit; and (5) The desire to legitimize the system inspires greater behavioral effort. We consider the implications of this motivational approach for understanding situations-including situations involving social conflict-that facilitate resistance to vs. support for social change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929553821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929553821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_19

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84883532607

SN - 9783642190353

SN - 3642190340

SN - 9783642190346

VL - 9783642190353

SP - 315

EP - 327

BT - Justice and Conflicts: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions

A2 - Kals, E

A2 - Maes, J

PB - Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

CY - New York

ER -