Syntactic priming as a test of argument structure: A self-paced reading experiment

Isabel Oltra-Massuet, Victoria Sharpe, Kyriaki Neophytou, Alec Marantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using data from a behavioral structural priming experiment, we test two competing theoretical approaches to argument structure, which attribute different configurations to (in)transitive structures. These approaches make different claims about the relationship between unergatives and transitive structures selecting either a DP complement or a small clause complement in structurally unambiguous sentences, thus making different predictions about priming relations between them. Using statistical tools that combine a factorial 6 ×6 within subjects ANOVA, a mixed effects ANCOVA and a linear mixed effects regression model, we report syntactic priming effects in comprehension, which suggest a stronger predictive contribution of a model that supports an interpretive semantics view of syntax, whereby syntactic structures do not necessarily reflect argument/event structure in semantically unambiguous configurations. They also contribute novel experimental evidence that correlate representational complexity with language processing in the mind and brain. Our study further upholds the validity of combining quantitative methods and theoretical approaches to linguistics for advancing our knowledge of syntactic phenomena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1311
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2017

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Semantics
Reading
Analysis of Variance
Language
Brain

Keywords

  • Argument structure
  • Comprehension
  • Structural priming
  • Transitivity
  • Unergativity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Syntactic priming as a test of argument structure : A self-paced reading experiment. / Oltra-Massuet, Isabel; Sharpe, Victoria; Neophytou, Kyriaki; Marantz, Alec.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, No. AUG, 1311, 15.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oltra-Massuet, Isabel ; Sharpe, Victoria ; Neophytou, Kyriaki ; Marantz, Alec. / Syntactic priming as a test of argument structure : A self-paced reading experiment. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. AUG.
@article{17c65438e1564dd69f8be2032bd40b2d,
title = "Syntactic priming as a test of argument structure: A self-paced reading experiment",
abstract = "Using data from a behavioral structural priming experiment, we test two competing theoretical approaches to argument structure, which attribute different configurations to (in)transitive structures. These approaches make different claims about the relationship between unergatives and transitive structures selecting either a DP complement or a small clause complement in structurally unambiguous sentences, thus making different predictions about priming relations between them. Using statistical tools that combine a factorial 6 ×6 within subjects ANOVA, a mixed effects ANCOVA and a linear mixed effects regression model, we report syntactic priming effects in comprehension, which suggest a stronger predictive contribution of a model that supports an interpretive semantics view of syntax, whereby syntactic structures do not necessarily reflect argument/event structure in semantically unambiguous configurations. They also contribute novel experimental evidence that correlate representational complexity with language processing in the mind and brain. Our study further upholds the validity of combining quantitative methods and theoretical approaches to linguistics for advancing our knowledge of syntactic phenomena.",
keywords = "Argument structure, Comprehension, Structural priming, Transitivity, Unergativity",
author = "Isabel Oltra-Massuet and Victoria Sharpe and Kyriaki Neophytou and Alec Marantz",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01311",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "AUG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Syntactic priming as a test of argument structure

T2 - A self-paced reading experiment

AU - Oltra-Massuet, Isabel

AU - Sharpe, Victoria

AU - Neophytou, Kyriaki

AU - Marantz, Alec

PY - 2017/8/15

Y1 - 2017/8/15

N2 - Using data from a behavioral structural priming experiment, we test two competing theoretical approaches to argument structure, which attribute different configurations to (in)transitive structures. These approaches make different claims about the relationship between unergatives and transitive structures selecting either a DP complement or a small clause complement in structurally unambiguous sentences, thus making different predictions about priming relations between them. Using statistical tools that combine a factorial 6 ×6 within subjects ANOVA, a mixed effects ANCOVA and a linear mixed effects regression model, we report syntactic priming effects in comprehension, which suggest a stronger predictive contribution of a model that supports an interpretive semantics view of syntax, whereby syntactic structures do not necessarily reflect argument/event structure in semantically unambiguous configurations. They also contribute novel experimental evidence that correlate representational complexity with language processing in the mind and brain. Our study further upholds the validity of combining quantitative methods and theoretical approaches to linguistics for advancing our knowledge of syntactic phenomena.

AB - Using data from a behavioral structural priming experiment, we test two competing theoretical approaches to argument structure, which attribute different configurations to (in)transitive structures. These approaches make different claims about the relationship between unergatives and transitive structures selecting either a DP complement or a small clause complement in structurally unambiguous sentences, thus making different predictions about priming relations between them. Using statistical tools that combine a factorial 6 ×6 within subjects ANOVA, a mixed effects ANCOVA and a linear mixed effects regression model, we report syntactic priming effects in comprehension, which suggest a stronger predictive contribution of a model that supports an interpretive semantics view of syntax, whereby syntactic structures do not necessarily reflect argument/event structure in semantically unambiguous configurations. They also contribute novel experimental evidence that correlate representational complexity with language processing in the mind and brain. Our study further upholds the validity of combining quantitative methods and theoretical approaches to linguistics for advancing our knowledge of syntactic phenomena.

KW - Argument structure

KW - Comprehension

KW - Structural priming

KW - Transitivity

KW - Unergativity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027570673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027570673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01311

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01311

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027570673

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - AUG

M1 - 1311

ER -