Sustained and transient covert attention: A test for signal enhancement

Samuel Ling, Marisa Carrasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

How similar are sustained and transient covert attention? We know that the former is conceptually-driven and voluntary, whereas the latter is stimulus-driven and automatic. However, we do not know whether both types of attention are mediated by similar mechanisms. It has been shown that the Signal Enhancement Model can account for the effect of transient attention (Carrasco, Penpeci-Talgar, Eckstein, 2000). In this study, by using either an endogenous or exogenous precue, we investigated whether the same mechanism could mediate both sustained and transient by comparing their effects on contrast sensitivity across a range of spatial frequencies. Either an endogenous (a 150ms central pointer indicating target location followed by a 150ms ISI) or exogenous (a small circle peripherally flashed for 40ms adjacent to the target location followed by a 60ms ISI) precue was used to indicate the location of the target - a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 1-8 cpd. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task on a supra-threshold target tilted 4 to the right or left. The target appeared for 100ms at one of 8 possible locations at 4 eccentricity. To eliminate all variables that could be accounted for by an External Noise Reduction model, the target was supra-threshold and presented alone, without any distracters or masks. Contrast thresholds were obtained via an adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST). We compared the magnitude of contrast sensitivity enhancement brought about by both types of attention. According to External Noise Reduction, in the absence of any added external noise there should be no attentional effect on contrast sensitivity. However, given these conditions, we found that sustained covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect was similar to that of transient attention. These results provide evidence in support of the existence of Signal Enhancement for both types of covert attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Noise
Masks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Sustained and transient covert attention : A test for signal enhancement. / Ling, Samuel; Carrasco, Marisa.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 3, No. 9, 2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ling, Samuel ; Carrasco, Marisa. / Sustained and transient covert attention : A test for signal enhancement. In: Journal of Vision. 2003 ; Vol. 3, No. 9.
@article{76e7de8e31c84648988d2666bf0985c5,
title = "Sustained and transient covert attention: A test for signal enhancement",
abstract = "How similar are sustained and transient covert attention? We know that the former is conceptually-driven and voluntary, whereas the latter is stimulus-driven and automatic. However, we do not know whether both types of attention are mediated by similar mechanisms. It has been shown that the Signal Enhancement Model can account for the effect of transient attention (Carrasco, Penpeci-Talgar, Eckstein, 2000). In this study, by using either an endogenous or exogenous precue, we investigated whether the same mechanism could mediate both sustained and transient by comparing their effects on contrast sensitivity across a range of spatial frequencies. Either an endogenous (a 150ms central pointer indicating target location followed by a 150ms ISI) or exogenous (a small circle peripherally flashed for 40ms adjacent to the target location followed by a 60ms ISI) precue was used to indicate the location of the target - a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 1-8 cpd. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task on a supra-threshold target tilted 4 to the right or left. The target appeared for 100ms at one of 8 possible locations at 4 eccentricity. To eliminate all variables that could be accounted for by an External Noise Reduction model, the target was supra-threshold and presented alone, without any distracters or masks. Contrast thresholds were obtained via an adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST). We compared the magnitude of contrast sensitivity enhancement brought about by both types of attention. According to External Noise Reduction, in the absence of any added external noise there should be no attentional effect on contrast sensitivity. However, given these conditions, we found that sustained covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect was similar to that of transient attention. These results provide evidence in support of the existence of Signal Enhancement for both types of covert attention.",
author = "Samuel Ling and Marisa Carrasco",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1167/3.9.734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustained and transient covert attention

T2 - A test for signal enhancement

AU - Ling, Samuel

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - How similar are sustained and transient covert attention? We know that the former is conceptually-driven and voluntary, whereas the latter is stimulus-driven and automatic. However, we do not know whether both types of attention are mediated by similar mechanisms. It has been shown that the Signal Enhancement Model can account for the effect of transient attention (Carrasco, Penpeci-Talgar, Eckstein, 2000). In this study, by using either an endogenous or exogenous precue, we investigated whether the same mechanism could mediate both sustained and transient by comparing their effects on contrast sensitivity across a range of spatial frequencies. Either an endogenous (a 150ms central pointer indicating target location followed by a 150ms ISI) or exogenous (a small circle peripherally flashed for 40ms adjacent to the target location followed by a 60ms ISI) precue was used to indicate the location of the target - a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 1-8 cpd. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task on a supra-threshold target tilted 4 to the right or left. The target appeared for 100ms at one of 8 possible locations at 4 eccentricity. To eliminate all variables that could be accounted for by an External Noise Reduction model, the target was supra-threshold and presented alone, without any distracters or masks. Contrast thresholds were obtained via an adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST). We compared the magnitude of contrast sensitivity enhancement brought about by both types of attention. According to External Noise Reduction, in the absence of any added external noise there should be no attentional effect on contrast sensitivity. However, given these conditions, we found that sustained covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect was similar to that of transient attention. These results provide evidence in support of the existence of Signal Enhancement for both types of covert attention.

AB - How similar are sustained and transient covert attention? We know that the former is conceptually-driven and voluntary, whereas the latter is stimulus-driven and automatic. However, we do not know whether both types of attention are mediated by similar mechanisms. It has been shown that the Signal Enhancement Model can account for the effect of transient attention (Carrasco, Penpeci-Talgar, Eckstein, 2000). In this study, by using either an endogenous or exogenous precue, we investigated whether the same mechanism could mediate both sustained and transient by comparing their effects on contrast sensitivity across a range of spatial frequencies. Either an endogenous (a 150ms central pointer indicating target location followed by a 150ms ISI) or exogenous (a small circle peripherally flashed for 40ms adjacent to the target location followed by a 60ms ISI) precue was used to indicate the location of the target - a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 1-8 cpd. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task on a supra-threshold target tilted 4 to the right or left. The target appeared for 100ms at one of 8 possible locations at 4 eccentricity. To eliminate all variables that could be accounted for by an External Noise Reduction model, the target was supra-threshold and presented alone, without any distracters or masks. Contrast thresholds were obtained via an adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST). We compared the magnitude of contrast sensitivity enhancement brought about by both types of attention. According to External Noise Reduction, in the absence of any added external noise there should be no attentional effect on contrast sensitivity. However, given these conditions, we found that sustained covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect was similar to that of transient attention. These results provide evidence in support of the existence of Signal Enhancement for both types of covert attention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243162121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243162121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/3.9.734

DO - 10.1167/3.9.734

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4243162121

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 9

ER -