Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.

P. A. Aharon, S. Eisig, George Cisneros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test and compare the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue profile predictions generated from two computer software programs. The presurgical and postsurgical cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients were digitized onto each computer program. A customized analysis was created to determine the amount of surgical movement, as well as to compare the actual postsurgical soft tissue profile with the computer-generated prediction. The results demonstrated that, on the average, the predictions were not significantly different from the actual postsurgical profile changes. While each program generated statistically similar prediction results, marked variability was noted. There was no significant difference found in the prediction errors between patients who had one-jaw surgery and those who had two-jaw surgery. This study found that a linear relationship existed between the surgical movement and the prediction error. In general, the greater the magnitude of the surgical movement, the larger the prediction error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-78
Number of pages14
JournalThe International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Computer Systems
Orthognathic Surgery
Software
Cephalometry

Cite this

Surgical prediction reliability : a comparison of two computer software systems. / Aharon, P. A.; Eisig, S.; Cisneros, George.

In: The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1997, p. 65-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5db3a95870524b7da23c2b6d01b3479f,
title = "Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to test and compare the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue profile predictions generated from two computer software programs. The presurgical and postsurgical cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients were digitized onto each computer program. A customized analysis was created to determine the amount of surgical movement, as well as to compare the actual postsurgical soft tissue profile with the computer-generated prediction. The results demonstrated that, on the average, the predictions were not significantly different from the actual postsurgical profile changes. While each program generated statistically similar prediction results, marked variability was noted. There was no significant difference found in the prediction errors between patients who had one-jaw surgery and those who had two-jaw surgery. This study found that a linear relationship existed between the surgical movement and the prediction error. In general, the greater the magnitude of the surgical movement, the larger the prediction error.",
author = "Aharon, {P. A.} and S. Eisig and George Cisneros",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "65--78",
journal = "The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery",
issn = "0742-1931",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical prediction reliability

T2 - a comparison of two computer software systems.

AU - Aharon, P. A.

AU - Eisig, S.

AU - Cisneros, George

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The purpose of this study was to test and compare the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue profile predictions generated from two computer software programs. The presurgical and postsurgical cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients were digitized onto each computer program. A customized analysis was created to determine the amount of surgical movement, as well as to compare the actual postsurgical soft tissue profile with the computer-generated prediction. The results demonstrated that, on the average, the predictions were not significantly different from the actual postsurgical profile changes. While each program generated statistically similar prediction results, marked variability was noted. There was no significant difference found in the prediction errors between patients who had one-jaw surgery and those who had two-jaw surgery. This study found that a linear relationship existed between the surgical movement and the prediction error. In general, the greater the magnitude of the surgical movement, the larger the prediction error.

AB - The purpose of this study was to test and compare the accuracy and reliability of soft tissue profile predictions generated from two computer software programs. The presurgical and postsurgical cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients were digitized onto each computer program. A customized analysis was created to determine the amount of surgical movement, as well as to compare the actual postsurgical soft tissue profile with the computer-generated prediction. The results demonstrated that, on the average, the predictions were not significantly different from the actual postsurgical profile changes. While each program generated statistically similar prediction results, marked variability was noted. There was no significant difference found in the prediction errors between patients who had one-jaw surgery and those who had two-jaw surgery. This study found that a linear relationship existed between the surgical movement and the prediction error. In general, the greater the magnitude of the surgical movement, the larger the prediction error.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031299230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031299230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9456619

AN - SCOPUS:0031299230

VL - 12

SP - 65

EP - 78

JO - The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery

JF - The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery

SN - 0742-1931

IS - 1

ER -