Surgeon's and nurses' use of E-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients

Sarah H. Kagan, Sean Clarke, Mary Beth Happ

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background. "Telephone tag" for questions about postoperative symptoms and other concerns often engenders dissatisfaction. E-mail use may improve communication between patients and clinicians. This study aimed to describe surgeons' and nurses' use of E-mail with patients and their caregivers after head and neck cancer surgery. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of head and neck nurses and surgeons. Results. Ninety-six percent of surgeon and 87% of nurse respondents used E-mail, but only 40% and 25%, respectively, used it with patients. More than 50% of both clinician groups that used E-mail with patients have done so for 2 to 5 years and began this practice at the request of patients. Surgeons not using E-mail with patients were twice as likely as nurses to cite privacy and liability issues, as well as time management and miscommunication concerns. Conclusions. Some clinicians use E-mail with patients, most often by patient request. Medicolegal and clinical ramifications require further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-113
Number of pages6
JournalHead and Neck
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Nurses
Communication
Supervisory Nursing
Time Management
Surgeons
Privacy
Telephone
Caregivers
Neck
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Communication
  • E-mail
  • Head and neck surgery
  • Nurse
  • Surgeon
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Surgeon's and nurses' use of E-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients. / Kagan, Sarah H.; Clarke, Sean; Happ, Mary Beth.

In: Head and Neck, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 108-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kagan, Sarah H. ; Clarke, Sean ; Happ, Mary Beth. / Surgeon's and nurses' use of E-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients. In: Head and Neck. 2005 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 108-113.
@article{6fa1f9673dd24a4fbf3cdb3e6079bd36,
title = "Surgeon's and nurses' use of E-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients",
abstract = "Background. {"}Telephone tag{"} for questions about postoperative symptoms and other concerns often engenders dissatisfaction. E-mail use may improve communication between patients and clinicians. This study aimed to describe surgeons' and nurses' use of E-mail with patients and their caregivers after head and neck cancer surgery. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of head and neck nurses and surgeons. Results. Ninety-six percent of surgeon and 87{\%} of nurse respondents used E-mail, but only 40{\%} and 25{\%}, respectively, used it with patients. More than 50{\%} of both clinician groups that used E-mail with patients have done so for 2 to 5 years and began this practice at the request of patients. Surgeons not using E-mail with patients were twice as likely as nurses to cite privacy and liability issues, as well as time management and miscommunication concerns. Conclusions. Some clinicians use E-mail with patients, most often by patient request. Medicolegal and clinical ramifications require further study.",
keywords = "Communication, E-mail, Head and neck surgery, Nurse, Surgeon, Survey",
author = "Kagan, {Sarah H.} and Sean Clarke and Happ, {Mary Beth}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hed.20119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "108--113",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeon's and nurses' use of E-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients

AU - Kagan, Sarah H.

AU - Clarke, Sean

AU - Happ, Mary Beth

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Background. "Telephone tag" for questions about postoperative symptoms and other concerns often engenders dissatisfaction. E-mail use may improve communication between patients and clinicians. This study aimed to describe surgeons' and nurses' use of E-mail with patients and their caregivers after head and neck cancer surgery. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of head and neck nurses and surgeons. Results. Ninety-six percent of surgeon and 87% of nurse respondents used E-mail, but only 40% and 25%, respectively, used it with patients. More than 50% of both clinician groups that used E-mail with patients have done so for 2 to 5 years and began this practice at the request of patients. Surgeons not using E-mail with patients were twice as likely as nurses to cite privacy and liability issues, as well as time management and miscommunication concerns. Conclusions. Some clinicians use E-mail with patients, most often by patient request. Medicolegal and clinical ramifications require further study.

AB - Background. "Telephone tag" for questions about postoperative symptoms and other concerns often engenders dissatisfaction. E-mail use may improve communication between patients and clinicians. This study aimed to describe surgeons' and nurses' use of E-mail with patients and their caregivers after head and neck cancer surgery. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of head and neck nurses and surgeons. Results. Ninety-six percent of surgeon and 87% of nurse respondents used E-mail, but only 40% and 25%, respectively, used it with patients. More than 50% of both clinician groups that used E-mail with patients have done so for 2 to 5 years and began this practice at the request of patients. Surgeons not using E-mail with patients were twice as likely as nurses to cite privacy and liability issues, as well as time management and miscommunication concerns. Conclusions. Some clinicians use E-mail with patients, most often by patient request. Medicolegal and clinical ramifications require further study.

KW - Communication

KW - E-mail

KW - Head and neck surgery

KW - Nurse

KW - Surgeon

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13244255564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13244255564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hed.20119

DO - 10.1002/hed.20119

M3 - Review article

VL - 27

SP - 108

EP - 113

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

IS - 2

ER -