Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of dual acid-etched and grit-blasted/acid-etched implants in sheep

Daniel Yoo, Charles Marin, Gileade Freitas, Nick Tovar, Estevam A. Bonfante, Hellen S. Teixeira, Malvin N. Janal, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Dual acid-etching is widely used to modify dental implant topography and enhance early bone healing. This study evaluated the histomorphometric, biomechanical, and histological bone response to acid-etched (AA) in comparison with grit-blasted/acid-etched (GB) and machined control (C) implants within sites of relatively low-bone remodeling rates. Materials and Methods: Implant surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and optical interferometry (IFM). Six adult male sheep (n 6) received 72 Ti-6Al-4V implants (n 24 per surface) in both ilium (n 12 per bone bilaterally). The implants remained for 3 and 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. Biomechanical analysis consisted of torque-to-interface failure. Results: IFM analysis showed the highest average surface roughness for GB and the highest density of summits and developed surface area percentage (P < 0.01) for AA. No difference was observed in BAFO for all groups in 3 and 6 weeks. Increased BIC and torque resistance were observed for AA implants at both time points after implantation. Conclusions: Overall, improved bone-to-implant response was observed for the AA implant surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-262
Number of pages7
JournalImplant Dentistry
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 2015

Fingerprint

Sheep
Bone and Bones
Acids
Interferometry
Torque
Ilium
Dental Implants
Bone Remodeling
Electron Scanning Microscopy

Keywords

  • biomechanical
  • dental implants
  • osseointegration
  • surface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of dual acid-etched and grit-blasted/acid-etched implants in sheep. / Yoo, Daniel; Marin, Charles; Freitas, Gileade; Tovar, Nick; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Teixeira, Hellen S.; Janal, Malvin N.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Implant Dentistry, Vol. 24, No. 3, 04.06.2015, p. 256-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoo, Daniel ; Marin, Charles ; Freitas, Gileade ; Tovar, Nick ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Teixeira, Hellen S. ; Janal, Malvin N. ; Coelho, Paulo. / Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of dual acid-etched and grit-blasted/acid-etched implants in sheep. In: Implant Dentistry. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 256-262.
@article{4ea5a795f1124d38ac50266be60bb5e8,
title = "Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of dual acid-etched and grit-blasted/acid-etched implants in sheep",
abstract = "Purpose: Dual acid-etching is widely used to modify dental implant topography and enhance early bone healing. This study evaluated the histomorphometric, biomechanical, and histological bone response to acid-etched (AA) in comparison with grit-blasted/acid-etched (GB) and machined control (C) implants within sites of relatively low-bone remodeling rates. Materials and Methods: Implant surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and optical interferometry (IFM). Six adult male sheep (n 6) received 72 Ti-6Al-4V implants (n 24 per surface) in both ilium (n 12 per bone bilaterally). The implants remained for 3 and 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. Biomechanical analysis consisted of torque-to-interface failure. Results: IFM analysis showed the highest average surface roughness for GB and the highest density of summits and developed surface area percentage (P < 0.01) for AA. No difference was observed in BAFO for all groups in 3 and 6 weeks. Increased BIC and torque resistance were observed for AA implants at both time points after implantation. Conclusions: Overall, improved bone-to-implant response was observed for the AA implant surface.",
keywords = "biomechanical, dental implants, osseointegration, surface",
author = "Daniel Yoo and Charles Marin and Gileade Freitas and Nick Tovar and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Teixeira, {Hellen S.} and Janal, {Malvin N.} and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "256--262",
journal = "Implant Dentistry",
issn = "1056-6163",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of dual acid-etched and grit-blasted/acid-etched implants in sheep

AU - Yoo, Daniel

AU - Marin, Charles

AU - Freitas, Gileade

AU - Tovar, Nick

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Teixeira, Hellen S.

AU - Janal, Malvin N.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2015/6/4

Y1 - 2015/6/4

N2 - Purpose: Dual acid-etching is widely used to modify dental implant topography and enhance early bone healing. This study evaluated the histomorphometric, biomechanical, and histological bone response to acid-etched (AA) in comparison with grit-blasted/acid-etched (GB) and machined control (C) implants within sites of relatively low-bone remodeling rates. Materials and Methods: Implant surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and optical interferometry (IFM). Six adult male sheep (n 6) received 72 Ti-6Al-4V implants (n 24 per surface) in both ilium (n 12 per bone bilaterally). The implants remained for 3 and 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. Biomechanical analysis consisted of torque-to-interface failure. Results: IFM analysis showed the highest average surface roughness for GB and the highest density of summits and developed surface area percentage (P < 0.01) for AA. No difference was observed in BAFO for all groups in 3 and 6 weeks. Increased BIC and torque resistance were observed for AA implants at both time points after implantation. Conclusions: Overall, improved bone-to-implant response was observed for the AA implant surface.

AB - Purpose: Dual acid-etching is widely used to modify dental implant topography and enhance early bone healing. This study evaluated the histomorphometric, biomechanical, and histological bone response to acid-etched (AA) in comparison with grit-blasted/acid-etched (GB) and machined control (C) implants within sites of relatively low-bone remodeling rates. Materials and Methods: Implant surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and optical interferometry (IFM). Six adult male sheep (n 6) received 72 Ti-6Al-4V implants (n 24 per surface) in both ilium (n 12 per bone bilaterally). The implants remained for 3 and 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. Biomechanical analysis consisted of torque-to-interface failure. Results: IFM analysis showed the highest average surface roughness for GB and the highest density of summits and developed surface area percentage (P < 0.01) for AA. No difference was observed in BAFO for all groups in 3 and 6 weeks. Increased BIC and torque resistance were observed for AA implants at both time points after implantation. Conclusions: Overall, improved bone-to-implant response was observed for the AA implant surface.

KW - biomechanical

KW - dental implants

KW - osseointegration

KW - surface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930342670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930342670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000248

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000248

M3 - Article

C2 - 25860908

AN - SCOPUS:84930342670

VL - 24

SP - 256

EP - 262

JO - Implant Dentistry

JF - Implant Dentistry

SN - 1056-6163

IS - 3

ER -