Summed and weighted summary scores for the medsger disease severity scale compared with the physician's global assessment of disease severity in systemic sclerosis

Daphna Harel, Marie Hudson, Alexandra Iliescu, Murray Baron, Russell Steele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To develop a weighted summary score for the Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS) and to compare its measurement properties with those of a summed DSS score and a physician's global assessment (PGA) of severity score in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. Data from 875 patients with SSc enrolled in a multisite observational research cohort were extracted from a central database. Item response theory was used to estimate weights for the DSS weighted score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and convergent, discriminative, and predictive validity of the 3 summary measures in relation to patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and mortality were compared. Results. Mean PGA was 2.69 (SD 2.16, range 0-10), mean DSS summed score was 8.60 (SD 4.02, range 0-36), and mean DSS weighted score was 8.11 (SD 4.05, range 0-36). ICC were similar for all 3 measures [PGA 6.9%, 95% credible intervals (CrI) 2.1-16.2; DSS summed score 2.5%, 95% CrI 0.4-6.7; DSS weighted score 2.0%, 95% CrI 0.1-5.6]. Convergent and discriminative validity of the 3 measures for PRO were largely similar. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age and sex, the 3 measures had similar predictive ability for mortality (adjusted R2 13.9% for PGA, 12.3% for DSS summed score, and 10.7% DSS weighted score). Conclusion. The 3 summary scores appear valid and perform similarly. However, there were some concerns with the weights computed for individual DSS scales, with unexpected low weights attributed to lung, heart, and kidney, leading the PGA to be the preferred measure at this time. Further work refining the DSS could improve the measurement properties of the DSS summary scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1510-1518
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Systemic Scleroderma
Physicians
Weights and Measures
Mortality
Proportional Hazards Models
Databases

Keywords

  • Disease severity scleroderma
  • Disease severity score
  • Outcome assessment
  • Systemic sclerosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Summed and weighted summary scores for the medsger disease severity scale compared with the physician's global assessment of disease severity in systemic sclerosis. / Harel, Daphna; Hudson, Marie; Iliescu, Alexandra; Baron, Murray; Steele, Russell.

In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 43, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1510-1518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3b72e9fd6ad41ffbba15aa383a35f5c,
title = "Summed and weighted summary scores for the medsger disease severity scale compared with the physician's global assessment of disease severity in systemic sclerosis",
abstract = "Objective. To develop a weighted summary score for the Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS) and to compare its measurement properties with those of a summed DSS score and a physician's global assessment (PGA) of severity score in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. Data from 875 patients with SSc enrolled in a multisite observational research cohort were extracted from a central database. Item response theory was used to estimate weights for the DSS weighted score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and convergent, discriminative, and predictive validity of the 3 summary measures in relation to patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and mortality were compared. Results. Mean PGA was 2.69 (SD 2.16, range 0-10), mean DSS summed score was 8.60 (SD 4.02, range 0-36), and mean DSS weighted score was 8.11 (SD 4.05, range 0-36). ICC were similar for all 3 measures [PGA 6.9{\%}, 95{\%} credible intervals (CrI) 2.1-16.2; DSS summed score 2.5{\%}, 95{\%} CrI 0.4-6.7; DSS weighted score 2.0{\%}, 95{\%} CrI 0.1-5.6]. Convergent and discriminative validity of the 3 measures for PRO were largely similar. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age and sex, the 3 measures had similar predictive ability for mortality (adjusted R2 13.9{\%} for PGA, 12.3{\%} for DSS summed score, and 10.7{\%} DSS weighted score). Conclusion. The 3 summary scores appear valid and perform similarly. However, there were some concerns with the weights computed for individual DSS scales, with unexpected low weights attributed to lung, heart, and kidney, leading the PGA to be the preferred measure at this time. Further work refining the DSS could improve the measurement properties of the DSS summary scores.",
keywords = "Disease severity scleroderma, Disease severity score, Outcome assessment, Systemic sclerosis",
author = "Daphna Harel and Marie Hudson and Alexandra Iliescu and Murray Baron and Russell Steele",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3899/jrheum.151440",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1510--1518",
journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Summed and weighted summary scores for the medsger disease severity scale compared with the physician's global assessment of disease severity in systemic sclerosis

AU - Harel, Daphna

AU - Hudson, Marie

AU - Iliescu, Alexandra

AU - Baron, Murray

AU - Steele, Russell

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Objective. To develop a weighted summary score for the Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS) and to compare its measurement properties with those of a summed DSS score and a physician's global assessment (PGA) of severity score in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. Data from 875 patients with SSc enrolled in a multisite observational research cohort were extracted from a central database. Item response theory was used to estimate weights for the DSS weighted score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and convergent, discriminative, and predictive validity of the 3 summary measures in relation to patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and mortality were compared. Results. Mean PGA was 2.69 (SD 2.16, range 0-10), mean DSS summed score was 8.60 (SD 4.02, range 0-36), and mean DSS weighted score was 8.11 (SD 4.05, range 0-36). ICC were similar for all 3 measures [PGA 6.9%, 95% credible intervals (CrI) 2.1-16.2; DSS summed score 2.5%, 95% CrI 0.4-6.7; DSS weighted score 2.0%, 95% CrI 0.1-5.6]. Convergent and discriminative validity of the 3 measures for PRO were largely similar. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age and sex, the 3 measures had similar predictive ability for mortality (adjusted R2 13.9% for PGA, 12.3% for DSS summed score, and 10.7% DSS weighted score). Conclusion. The 3 summary scores appear valid and perform similarly. However, there were some concerns with the weights computed for individual DSS scales, with unexpected low weights attributed to lung, heart, and kidney, leading the PGA to be the preferred measure at this time. Further work refining the DSS could improve the measurement properties of the DSS summary scores.

AB - Objective. To develop a weighted summary score for the Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS) and to compare its measurement properties with those of a summed DSS score and a physician's global assessment (PGA) of severity score in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. Data from 875 patients with SSc enrolled in a multisite observational research cohort were extracted from a central database. Item response theory was used to estimate weights for the DSS weighted score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and convergent, discriminative, and predictive validity of the 3 summary measures in relation to patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and mortality were compared. Results. Mean PGA was 2.69 (SD 2.16, range 0-10), mean DSS summed score was 8.60 (SD 4.02, range 0-36), and mean DSS weighted score was 8.11 (SD 4.05, range 0-36). ICC were similar for all 3 measures [PGA 6.9%, 95% credible intervals (CrI) 2.1-16.2; DSS summed score 2.5%, 95% CrI 0.4-6.7; DSS weighted score 2.0%, 95% CrI 0.1-5.6]. Convergent and discriminative validity of the 3 measures for PRO were largely similar. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age and sex, the 3 measures had similar predictive ability for mortality (adjusted R2 13.9% for PGA, 12.3% for DSS summed score, and 10.7% DSS weighted score). Conclusion. The 3 summary scores appear valid and perform similarly. However, there were some concerns with the weights computed for individual DSS scales, with unexpected low weights attributed to lung, heart, and kidney, leading the PGA to be the preferred measure at this time. Further work refining the DSS could improve the measurement properties of the DSS summary scores.

KW - Disease severity scleroderma

KW - Disease severity score

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Systemic sclerosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982797274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982797274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.151440

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.151440

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1510

EP - 1518

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 8

ER -