Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning

Lewis Bott, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Subtyping occurs when atypical examples are excluded from consideration in judging a category. In three experiments, we investigated whether subtyping can influence category learning. In each experiment, participants learned about a category where most, but not all, of the exemplars corresponded to a theme. The category structure included a subtyping dimension, which had one value for theme-congruent exemplars and another for exception exemplars. On the basis of work by Hayes, Foster, and Gadd (2003) and studies on social stereotyping, we hypothesized that this subtyping dimension would enable the participants to discount the exception exemplars, thereby facilitating category learning. Contrary to expectations, we did not find a subtyping effect with traditional category-learning procedures. By introducing the theme prior to learning, however, we observed increased effects on typicality ratings (Experiment 1) and facilitated learning of the category (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 provided direct evidence that introducing the theme prior to learning enhanced the subtyping effect and provided support for a knowledge-gating explanation of subtyping. We conclude that subtyping effects are strongest on already-learned concepts and that subtyping is unlikely to aid in the learning of new concepts, except in particular circumstances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-443
Number of pages12
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume35
Issue number3
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Learning
Stereotyping
Category Learning
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. / Bott, Lewis; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 35, No. 3, 04.2007, p. 432-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bott, L & Murphy, G 2007, 'Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning', Memory & Cognition, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 432-443.
Bott, Lewis ; Murphy, Gregory. / Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. In: Memory & Cognition. 2007 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 432-443.
@article{fbeb9ccd5b2b493c93304a79ab39253e,
title = "Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning",
abstract = "Subtyping occurs when atypical examples are excluded from consideration in judging a category. In three experiments, we investigated whether subtyping can influence category learning. In each experiment, participants learned about a category where most, but not all, of the exemplars corresponded to a theme. The category structure included a subtyping dimension, which had one value for theme-congruent exemplars and another for exception exemplars. On the basis of work by Hayes, Foster, and Gadd (2003) and studies on social stereotyping, we hypothesized that this subtyping dimension would enable the participants to discount the exception exemplars, thereby facilitating category learning. Contrary to expectations, we did not find a subtyping effect with traditional category-learning procedures. By introducing the theme prior to learning, however, we observed increased effects on typicality ratings (Experiment 1) and facilitated learning of the category (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 provided direct evidence that introducing the theme prior to learning enhanced the subtyping effect and provided support for a knowledge-gating explanation of subtyping. We conclude that subtyping effects are strongest on already-learned concepts and that subtyping is unlikely to aid in the learning of new concepts, except in particular circumstances.",
author = "Lewis Bott and Gregory Murphy",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "432--443",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning

AU - Bott, Lewis

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Subtyping occurs when atypical examples are excluded from consideration in judging a category. In three experiments, we investigated whether subtyping can influence category learning. In each experiment, participants learned about a category where most, but not all, of the exemplars corresponded to a theme. The category structure included a subtyping dimension, which had one value for theme-congruent exemplars and another for exception exemplars. On the basis of work by Hayes, Foster, and Gadd (2003) and studies on social stereotyping, we hypothesized that this subtyping dimension would enable the participants to discount the exception exemplars, thereby facilitating category learning. Contrary to expectations, we did not find a subtyping effect with traditional category-learning procedures. By introducing the theme prior to learning, however, we observed increased effects on typicality ratings (Experiment 1) and facilitated learning of the category (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 provided direct evidence that introducing the theme prior to learning enhanced the subtyping effect and provided support for a knowledge-gating explanation of subtyping. We conclude that subtyping effects are strongest on already-learned concepts and that subtyping is unlikely to aid in the learning of new concepts, except in particular circumstances.

AB - Subtyping occurs when atypical examples are excluded from consideration in judging a category. In three experiments, we investigated whether subtyping can influence category learning. In each experiment, participants learned about a category where most, but not all, of the exemplars corresponded to a theme. The category structure included a subtyping dimension, which had one value for theme-congruent exemplars and another for exception exemplars. On the basis of work by Hayes, Foster, and Gadd (2003) and studies on social stereotyping, we hypothesized that this subtyping dimension would enable the participants to discount the exception exemplars, thereby facilitating category learning. Contrary to expectations, we did not find a subtyping effect with traditional category-learning procedures. By introducing the theme prior to learning, however, we observed increased effects on typicality ratings (Experiment 1) and facilitated learning of the category (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 provided direct evidence that introducing the theme prior to learning enhanced the subtyping effect and provided support for a knowledge-gating explanation of subtyping. We conclude that subtyping effects are strongest on already-learned concepts and that subtyping is unlikely to aid in the learning of new concepts, except in particular circumstances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447332833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447332833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17671607

AN - SCOPUS:34447332833

VL - 35

SP - 432

EP - 443

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 3

ER -