Substitution and pooling in crowding

Jeremy Freeman, Ramakrishna Chakravarthi, Denis Pelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unless we fixate directly on it, it is hard to see an object among other objects. This breakdown in object recognition, called crowding, severely limits peripheral vision. The effect is more severe when objects are more similar. When observers mistake the identity of a target among flanker objects, they often report a flanker. Many have taken these flanker reports as evidence of internal substitution of the target by a flanker. Here, we ask observers to identify a target letter presented in between one similar and one dissimilar flanker letter. Simple substitution takes in only one letter, which is often the target but, by unwitting mistake, is sometimes a flanker. The opposite of substitution is pooling, which takes in more than one letter. Having taken only one letter, the substitution process knows only its identity, not its similarity to the target. Thus, it must report similar and dissimilar flankers equally often. Contrary to this prediction, the similar flanker is reported much more often than the dissimilar flanker, showing that rampant flanker substitution cannot account for most flanker reports. Mixture modeling shows that simple substitution can account for, at most, about half the trials. Pooling and nonpooling (simple substitution) together include all possible models of crowding. When observers are asked to identify a crowded object, at least half of their reports are pooled, based on a combination of information from target and flankers, rather than being based on a single letter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-396
Number of pages18
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Crowding
substitution
Substitution
Letters
evidence
Observer

Keywords

  • Crowding
  • Mixture modeling
  • Pooling
  • Substitution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Substitution and pooling in crowding. / Freeman, Jeremy; Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna; Pelli, Denis.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 74, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 379-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freeman, Jeremy ; Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna ; Pelli, Denis. / Substitution and pooling in crowding. In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2012 ; Vol. 74, No. 2. pp. 379-396.
@article{5c0d8db129fd4a4ca127f068217c565f,
title = "Substitution and pooling in crowding",
abstract = "Unless we fixate directly on it, it is hard to see an object among other objects. This breakdown in object recognition, called crowding, severely limits peripheral vision. The effect is more severe when objects are more similar. When observers mistake the identity of a target among flanker objects, they often report a flanker. Many have taken these flanker reports as evidence of internal substitution of the target by a flanker. Here, we ask observers to identify a target letter presented in between one similar and one dissimilar flanker letter. Simple substitution takes in only one letter, which is often the target but, by unwitting mistake, is sometimes a flanker. The opposite of substitution is pooling, which takes in more than one letter. Having taken only one letter, the substitution process knows only its identity, not its similarity to the target. Thus, it must report similar and dissimilar flankers equally often. Contrary to this prediction, the similar flanker is reported much more often than the dissimilar flanker, showing that rampant flanker substitution cannot account for most flanker reports. Mixture modeling shows that simple substitution can account for, at most, about half the trials. Pooling and nonpooling (simple substitution) together include all possible models of crowding. When observers are asked to identify a crowded object, at least half of their reports are pooled, based on a combination of information from target and flankers, rather than being based on a single letter.",
keywords = "Crowding, Mixture modeling, Pooling, Substitution",
author = "Jeremy Freeman and Ramakrishna Chakravarthi and Denis Pelli",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "379--396",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substitution and pooling in crowding

AU - Freeman, Jeremy

AU - Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna

AU - Pelli, Denis

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Unless we fixate directly on it, it is hard to see an object among other objects. This breakdown in object recognition, called crowding, severely limits peripheral vision. The effect is more severe when objects are more similar. When observers mistake the identity of a target among flanker objects, they often report a flanker. Many have taken these flanker reports as evidence of internal substitution of the target by a flanker. Here, we ask observers to identify a target letter presented in between one similar and one dissimilar flanker letter. Simple substitution takes in only one letter, which is often the target but, by unwitting mistake, is sometimes a flanker. The opposite of substitution is pooling, which takes in more than one letter. Having taken only one letter, the substitution process knows only its identity, not its similarity to the target. Thus, it must report similar and dissimilar flankers equally often. Contrary to this prediction, the similar flanker is reported much more often than the dissimilar flanker, showing that rampant flanker substitution cannot account for most flanker reports. Mixture modeling shows that simple substitution can account for, at most, about half the trials. Pooling and nonpooling (simple substitution) together include all possible models of crowding. When observers are asked to identify a crowded object, at least half of their reports are pooled, based on a combination of information from target and flankers, rather than being based on a single letter.

AB - Unless we fixate directly on it, it is hard to see an object among other objects. This breakdown in object recognition, called crowding, severely limits peripheral vision. The effect is more severe when objects are more similar. When observers mistake the identity of a target among flanker objects, they often report a flanker. Many have taken these flanker reports as evidence of internal substitution of the target by a flanker. Here, we ask observers to identify a target letter presented in between one similar and one dissimilar flanker letter. Simple substitution takes in only one letter, which is often the target but, by unwitting mistake, is sometimes a flanker. The opposite of substitution is pooling, which takes in more than one letter. Having taken only one letter, the substitution process knows only its identity, not its similarity to the target. Thus, it must report similar and dissimilar flankers equally often. Contrary to this prediction, the similar flanker is reported much more often than the dissimilar flanker, showing that rampant flanker substitution cannot account for most flanker reports. Mixture modeling shows that simple substitution can account for, at most, about half the trials. Pooling and nonpooling (simple substitution) together include all possible models of crowding. When observers are asked to identify a crowded object, at least half of their reports are pooled, based on a combination of information from target and flankers, rather than being based on a single letter.

KW - Crowding

KW - Mixture modeling

KW - Pooling

KW - Substitution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857564580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857564580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0

DO - 10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 379

EP - 396

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 2

ER -