Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks? ( USA).

W. J. Baumol, E. N. Wolff

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Abstract

    Energy-production subsidies are, paradoxically, shown to be likely to increase US dependence on imported oil. Standard studies of net energy yields are shown to be seriously biased upward for two reasons: 1) many omit indirect energy inputs, which, this input-output calculation shows, probably causes large errors; 2) they all omit the energy opportunity costs of nonenergy inputs (e.g., the fuel substituted elsewhere for the labor used to produce energy). Proves that, absent externalities, any fuel-output subsidy which causes an otherwise unprofitable expansion must yield an incremental fuel output smaller than the increment in energy input plus the energy opportunity costs of other inputs. -Authors

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationInput-output analysis
    EditorsHeinz D. Kurz, Christian Lager
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Number of pages23
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Energy sources
    Subsidies
    Energy
    Opportunity cost
    Production subsidy
    Incremental
    Externalities
    Labor
    Oil

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Baumol, W. J., & Wolff, E. N. (2017). Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks? ( USA). In H. D. Kurz, & C. Lager (Eds.), Input-output analysis Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1086/261012

    Subsidies to new energy sources : do they add to energy stocks? ( USA). / Baumol, W. J.; Wolff, E. N.

    Input-output analysis. ed. / Heinz D. Kurz; Christian Lager. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2017.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    Baumol, WJ & Wolff, EN 2017, Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks? ( USA). in HD Kurz & C Lager (eds), Input-output analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1086/261012
    Baumol WJ, Wolff EN. Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks? ( USA). In Kurz HD, Lager C, editors, Input-output analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1086/261012
    Baumol, W. J. ; Wolff, E. N. / Subsidies to new energy sources : do they add to energy stocks? ( USA). Input-output analysis. editor / Heinz D. Kurz ; Christian Lager. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2017.
    @inbook{454113ba5d5341189700ba1bc81c22d0,
    title = "Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks? ( USA).",
    abstract = "Energy-production subsidies are, paradoxically, shown to be likely to increase US dependence on imported oil. Standard studies of net energy yields are shown to be seriously biased upward for two reasons: 1) many omit indirect energy inputs, which, this input-output calculation shows, probably causes large errors; 2) they all omit the energy opportunity costs of nonenergy inputs (e.g., the fuel substituted elsewhere for the labor used to produce energy). Proves that, absent externalities, any fuel-output subsidy which causes an otherwise unprofitable expansion must yield an incremental fuel output smaller than the increment in energy input plus the energy opportunity costs of other inputs. -Authors",
    author = "Baumol, {W. J.} and Wolff, {E. N.}",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1086/261012",
    language = "English (US)",
    editor = "Kurz, {Heinz D. } and Lager, {Christian }",
    booktitle = "Input-output analysis",
    publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Subsidies to new energy sources

    T2 - do they add to energy stocks? ( USA).

    AU - Baumol, W. J.

    AU - Wolff, E. N.

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Energy-production subsidies are, paradoxically, shown to be likely to increase US dependence on imported oil. Standard studies of net energy yields are shown to be seriously biased upward for two reasons: 1) many omit indirect energy inputs, which, this input-output calculation shows, probably causes large errors; 2) they all omit the energy opportunity costs of nonenergy inputs (e.g., the fuel substituted elsewhere for the labor used to produce energy). Proves that, absent externalities, any fuel-output subsidy which causes an otherwise unprofitable expansion must yield an incremental fuel output smaller than the increment in energy input plus the energy opportunity costs of other inputs. -Authors

    AB - Energy-production subsidies are, paradoxically, shown to be likely to increase US dependence on imported oil. Standard studies of net energy yields are shown to be seriously biased upward for two reasons: 1) many omit indirect energy inputs, which, this input-output calculation shows, probably causes large errors; 2) they all omit the energy opportunity costs of nonenergy inputs (e.g., the fuel substituted elsewhere for the labor used to produce energy). Proves that, absent externalities, any fuel-output subsidy which causes an otherwise unprofitable expansion must yield an incremental fuel output smaller than the increment in energy input plus the energy opportunity costs of other inputs. -Authors

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019678695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019678695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/261012

    DO - 10.1086/261012

    M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

    BT - Input-output analysis

    A2 - Kurz, Heinz D.

    A2 - Lager, Christian

    PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    ER -