Studying status: An integrated framework

Guillermina Jasso

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper reports development of an integrated framework for studying status. The framework provides models and methods for addressing long-standing, unresolved issues, such as (1) the emergence of status, (2) distinguishing between the status of individuals and the status of characteristics, and (3) measuring and understanding the status gap between subgroups (between men and women, or between races). The framework, which covers both small groups and large societies, and both task and nontask groups, utilizes ideas and insights from several literatures to identify three types of status, linked in precise ways to two kinds of personal characteristics (quantitative and qualitative). The three types of status are mathematically specified, and initial theoretical development is presented for all three, including, for each, formulation of measures, derivation of testable implications, and analysis of how to change status and the status structure. Testable implications cover such phenomena as status differences between group members, status gaps between subgroups, overall status inequality, and status gains and losses from discrimination - all under varying conditions, including the number and intercorrelation of status-conferring personal characteristics and the proportions in the subgroups. The new status theory also identifies two mechanisms involved in the phenomenon of "internalized oppression." The framework thus opens many avenues for future work, both theoretical work, deriving more and sharper implications, and empirical work, testing the implications and using the new measures for the status of persons and the status of characteristics to assess key status phenomena in surveys and experiments.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)96-124
    Number of pages29
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume66
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    oppression
    group membership
    small group
    discrimination
    human being
    experiment
    society
    Group
    literature

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Studying status : An integrated framework. / Jasso, Guillermina.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2001, p. 96-124.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jasso, G 2001, 'Studying status: An integrated framework', American Sociological Review, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 96-124.
    Jasso, Guillermina. / Studying status : An integrated framework. In: American Sociological Review. 2001 ; Vol. 66, No. 1. pp. 96-124.
    @article{e8a9eeed9d2145daab6754f9af47a746,
    title = "Studying status: An integrated framework",
    abstract = "This paper reports development of an integrated framework for studying status. The framework provides models and methods for addressing long-standing, unresolved issues, such as (1) the emergence of status, (2) distinguishing between the status of individuals and the status of characteristics, and (3) measuring and understanding the status gap between subgroups (between men and women, or between races). The framework, which covers both small groups and large societies, and both task and nontask groups, utilizes ideas and insights from several literatures to identify three types of status, linked in precise ways to two kinds of personal characteristics (quantitative and qualitative). The three types of status are mathematically specified, and initial theoretical development is presented for all three, including, for each, formulation of measures, derivation of testable implications, and analysis of how to change status and the status structure. Testable implications cover such phenomena as status differences between group members, status gaps between subgroups, overall status inequality, and status gains and losses from discrimination - all under varying conditions, including the number and intercorrelation of status-conferring personal characteristics and the proportions in the subgroups. The new status theory also identifies two mechanisms involved in the phenomenon of {"}internalized oppression.{"} The framework thus opens many avenues for future work, both theoretical work, deriving more and sharper implications, and empirical work, testing the implications and using the new measures for the status of persons and the status of characteristics to assess key status phenomena in surveys and experiments.",
    author = "Guillermina Jasso",
    year = "2001",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "66",
    pages = "96--124",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Studying status

    T2 - An integrated framework

    AU - Jasso, Guillermina

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - This paper reports development of an integrated framework for studying status. The framework provides models and methods for addressing long-standing, unresolved issues, such as (1) the emergence of status, (2) distinguishing between the status of individuals and the status of characteristics, and (3) measuring and understanding the status gap between subgroups (between men and women, or between races). The framework, which covers both small groups and large societies, and both task and nontask groups, utilizes ideas and insights from several literatures to identify three types of status, linked in precise ways to two kinds of personal characteristics (quantitative and qualitative). The three types of status are mathematically specified, and initial theoretical development is presented for all three, including, for each, formulation of measures, derivation of testable implications, and analysis of how to change status and the status structure. Testable implications cover such phenomena as status differences between group members, status gaps between subgroups, overall status inequality, and status gains and losses from discrimination - all under varying conditions, including the number and intercorrelation of status-conferring personal characteristics and the proportions in the subgroups. The new status theory also identifies two mechanisms involved in the phenomenon of "internalized oppression." The framework thus opens many avenues for future work, both theoretical work, deriving more and sharper implications, and empirical work, testing the implications and using the new measures for the status of persons and the status of characteristics to assess key status phenomena in surveys and experiments.

    AB - This paper reports development of an integrated framework for studying status. The framework provides models and methods for addressing long-standing, unresolved issues, such as (1) the emergence of status, (2) distinguishing between the status of individuals and the status of characteristics, and (3) measuring and understanding the status gap between subgroups (between men and women, or between races). The framework, which covers both small groups and large societies, and both task and nontask groups, utilizes ideas and insights from several literatures to identify three types of status, linked in precise ways to two kinds of personal characteristics (quantitative and qualitative). The three types of status are mathematically specified, and initial theoretical development is presented for all three, including, for each, formulation of measures, derivation of testable implications, and analysis of how to change status and the status structure. Testable implications cover such phenomena as status differences between group members, status gaps between subgroups, overall status inequality, and status gains and losses from discrimination - all under varying conditions, including the number and intercorrelation of status-conferring personal characteristics and the proportions in the subgroups. The new status theory also identifies two mechanisms involved in the phenomenon of "internalized oppression." The framework thus opens many avenues for future work, both theoretical work, deriving more and sharper implications, and empirical work, testing the implications and using the new measures for the status of persons and the status of characteristics to assess key status phenomena in surveys and experiments.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035106130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035106130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0035106130

    VL - 66

    SP - 96

    EP - 124

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 1

    ER -